{"title":"中国新疆古代儿童头骨随年龄增长的尺寸变化","authors":"Haijun Li, Jing Zhou, Yujie Zhao, Feng Chen, Hailong Zhang, Chang Fu, Bo Wang, Xiaoyong Xiao","doi":"10.1353/hub.2017.a925562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many scholars have conducted research on the growth patterns of children’s skulls in terms of skull\nsize, head circumference, cranial cavity volume, and so forth. This study compared and analyzed 20\nskull measurement indexes of different ages from skulls of 38 children (aged 2–15 years) and 87 adult\nfemales (20–40 years) at the Zaghunluq cemetery in Xinjiang, China, to determine how the size of ancient\nchildren’s skulls changed with age. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences between\nthe six age groups (2, 3–5, 6–8, 9–11, 12–15 years, and adults [20–40 years]) in terms of metrical cranial\ntraits, cranial area, and cranial cavity volume. Results indicate that the skull kept growing from ages 3–5,\n12–15, and adults, implying that the skull sizes of ancient children in Xinjiang continued to increase with\nage. In addition, the study revealed that children aged 12–15 had skulls that were significantly smaller\nthan those of adults. This finding showed that the skulls of ancient children in Xinjiang were not fully\ndeveloped at the age of 15. Notably, differences existed between age groups in both developmental traits\nof the cranium and the rates at which the skull changed.","PeriodicalId":13053,"journal":{"name":"Human Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dimensional Changes in the Skulls of Ancient Children with\\nAge in Xinjiang, China\",\"authors\":\"Haijun Li, Jing Zhou, Yujie Zhao, Feng Chen, Hailong Zhang, Chang Fu, Bo Wang, Xiaoyong Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hub.2017.a925562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many scholars have conducted research on the growth patterns of children’s skulls in terms of skull\\nsize, head circumference, cranial cavity volume, and so forth. This study compared and analyzed 20\\nskull measurement indexes of different ages from skulls of 38 children (aged 2–15 years) and 87 adult\\nfemales (20–40 years) at the Zaghunluq cemetery in Xinjiang, China, to determine how the size of ancient\\nchildren’s skulls changed with age. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences between\\nthe six age groups (2, 3–5, 6–8, 9–11, 12–15 years, and adults [20–40 years]) in terms of metrical cranial\\ntraits, cranial area, and cranial cavity volume. Results indicate that the skull kept growing from ages 3–5,\\n12–15, and adults, implying that the skull sizes of ancient children in Xinjiang continued to increase with\\nage. In addition, the study revealed that children aged 12–15 had skulls that were significantly smaller\\nthan those of adults. This finding showed that the skulls of ancient children in Xinjiang were not fully\\ndeveloped at the age of 15. Notably, differences existed between age groups in both developmental traits\\nof the cranium and the rates at which the skull changed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hub.2017.a925562\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hub.2017.a925562","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dimensional Changes in the Skulls of Ancient Children with
Age in Xinjiang, China
Many scholars have conducted research on the growth patterns of children’s skulls in terms of skull
size, head circumference, cranial cavity volume, and so forth. This study compared and analyzed 20
skull measurement indexes of different ages from skulls of 38 children (aged 2–15 years) and 87 adult
females (20–40 years) at the Zaghunluq cemetery in Xinjiang, China, to determine how the size of ancient
children’s skulls changed with age. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences between
the six age groups (2, 3–5, 6–8, 9–11, 12–15 years, and adults [20–40 years]) in terms of metrical cranial
traits, cranial area, and cranial cavity volume. Results indicate that the skull kept growing from ages 3–5,
12–15, and adults, implying that the skull sizes of ancient children in Xinjiang continued to increase with
age. In addition, the study revealed that children aged 12–15 had skulls that were significantly smaller
than those of adults. This finding showed that the skulls of ancient children in Xinjiang were not fully
developed at the age of 15. Notably, differences existed between age groups in both developmental traits
of the cranium and the rates at which the skull changed.
期刊介绍:
Human Biology publishes original scientific articles, brief communications, letters to the editor, and review articles on the general topic of biological anthropology. Our main focus is understanding human biological variation and human evolution through a broad range of approaches.
We encourage investigators to submit any study on human biological diversity presented from an evolutionary or adaptive perspective. Priority will be given to interdisciplinary studies that seek to better explain the interaction between cultural processes and biological processes in our evolution. Methodological papers are also encouraged. Any computational approach intended to summarize cultural variation is encouraged. Studies that are essentially descriptive or concern only a limited geographic area are acceptable only when they have a wider relevance to understanding human biological variation.
Manuscripts may cover any of the following disciplines, once the anthropological focus is apparent: human population genetics, evolutionary and genetic demography, quantitative genetics, evolutionary biology, ancient DNA studies, biological diversity interpreted in terms of adaptation (biometry, physical anthropology), and interdisciplinary research linking biological and cultural diversity (inferred from linguistic variability, ethnological diversity, archaeological evidence, etc.).