胃食管腺癌患者身体成分与存活率之间的关系:一种自动深度学习方法

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1200/CCI.23.00231
M. Jung, T. Diallo, Tobias Scheef, Marco Reisert, Alexander Rau, Maximilan F Russe, Fabian Bamberg, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, M. Quante, Jakob Weiss
{"title":"胃食管腺癌患者身体成分与存活率之间的关系:一种自动深度学习方法","authors":"M. Jung, T. Diallo, Tobias Scheef, Marco Reisert, Alexander Rau, Maximilan F Russe, Fabian Bamberg, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, M. Quante, Jakob Weiss","doi":"10.1200/CCI.23.00231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nBody composition (BC) may play a role in outcome prognostication in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEAC). Artificial intelligence provides new possibilities to opportunistically quantify BC from computed tomography (CT) scans. We developed a deep learning (DL) model for fully automatic BC quantification on routine staging CTs and determined its prognostic role in a clinical cohort of patients with GEAC.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nWe developed and tested a DL model to quantify BC measures defined as subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and skeletal muscle on routine CT and investigated their prognostic value in a cohort of patients with GEAC using baseline, 3-6-month, and 6-12-month postoperative CTs. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Cox regression assessed the association between (1) BC at baseline and mortality and (2) the decrease in BC between baseline and follow-up scans and mortality/DFS.\n\n\nRESULTS\nModel performance was high with Dice coefficients ≥0.94 ± 0.06. Among 299 patients with GEAC (age 63.0 ± 10.7 years; 19.4% female), 140 deaths (47%) occurred over a median follow-up of 31.3 months. At baseline, no BC measure was associated with DFS. Only a substantial decrease in VAT >70% after a 6- to 12-month follow-up was associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99 [95% CI, 1.18 to 3.34]; P = .009) and DFS (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.01 to 2.95]; P = .045) independent of age, sex, BMI, Union for International Cancer Control stage, histologic grading, resection status, neoadjuvant therapy, and time between surgery and follow-up CT.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nDL enables opportunistic estimation of BC from routine staging CT to quantify prognostic information. In patients with GEAC, only a substantial decrease of VAT 6-12 months postsurgery was an independent predictor for DFS beyond traditional risk factors, which may help to identify individuals at high risk who go otherwise unnoticed.","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Body Composition and Survival in Patients With Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: An Automated Deep Learning Approach.\",\"authors\":\"M. Jung, T. Diallo, Tobias Scheef, Marco Reisert, Alexander Rau, Maximilan F Russe, Fabian Bamberg, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, M. Quante, Jakob Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/CCI.23.00231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\nBody composition (BC) may play a role in outcome prognostication in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEAC). Artificial intelligence provides new possibilities to opportunistically quantify BC from computed tomography (CT) scans. We developed a deep learning (DL) model for fully automatic BC quantification on routine staging CTs and determined its prognostic role in a clinical cohort of patients with GEAC.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\nWe developed and tested a DL model to quantify BC measures defined as subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and skeletal muscle on routine CT and investigated their prognostic value in a cohort of patients with GEAC using baseline, 3-6-month, and 6-12-month postoperative CTs. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Cox regression assessed the association between (1) BC at baseline and mortality and (2) the decrease in BC between baseline and follow-up scans and mortality/DFS.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nModel performance was high with Dice coefficients ≥0.94 ± 0.06. Among 299 patients with GEAC (age 63.0 ± 10.7 years; 19.4% female), 140 deaths (47%) occurred over a median follow-up of 31.3 months. At baseline, no BC measure was associated with DFS. Only a substantial decrease in VAT >70% after a 6- to 12-month follow-up was associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99 [95% CI, 1.18 to 3.34]; P = .009) and DFS (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.01 to 2.95]; P = .045) independent of age, sex, BMI, Union for International Cancer Control stage, histologic grading, resection status, neoadjuvant therapy, and time between surgery and follow-up CT.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nDL enables opportunistic estimation of BC from routine staging CT to quantify prognostic information. In patients with GEAC, only a substantial decrease of VAT 6-12 months postsurgery was an independent predictor for DFS beyond traditional risk factors, which may help to identify individuals at high risk who go otherwise unnoticed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的身体成分(BC)可能会对胃食管腺癌(GEAC)患者的预后结果产生影响。人工智能为从计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描中适时量化BC提供了新的可能性。我们开发并测试了一种深度学习(DL)模型,用于在常规分期 CT 上全自动量化 BC,并利用基线、3-6 个月和术后 6-12 个月的 CT 在 GEAC 患者队列中确定其预后作用。主要结果是全因死亡率,次要结果是无病生存期(DFS)。Cox回归评估了(1)基线BC与死亡率之间的关系;(2)基线与随访扫描之间BC的下降与死亡率/DFS之间的关系。在 299 名 GEAC 患者(年龄为 63.0 ± 10.7 岁;19.4% 为女性)中,有 140 人(47%)在中位 31.3 个月的随访期间死亡。基线时,没有任何BC指标与DFS相关。只有在随访 6 至 12 个月后 VAT 大幅下降 >70% 才与死亡率(危险比 [HR],1.99 [95% CI,1.18 至 3.34];P = .009)和 DFS(HR,1.73 [95% CI,1.01 至 2.95];P = .结论DL能根据常规分期CT对BC进行机会性估计,量化预后信息。在GEAC患者中,只有术后6-12个月VAT的大幅下降才是超越传统风险因素的DFS独立预测因素,这可能有助于识别那些未被注意的高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association Between Body Composition and Survival in Patients With Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: An Automated Deep Learning Approach.
PURPOSE Body composition (BC) may play a role in outcome prognostication in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEAC). Artificial intelligence provides new possibilities to opportunistically quantify BC from computed tomography (CT) scans. We developed a deep learning (DL) model for fully automatic BC quantification on routine staging CTs and determined its prognostic role in a clinical cohort of patients with GEAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We developed and tested a DL model to quantify BC measures defined as subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and skeletal muscle on routine CT and investigated their prognostic value in a cohort of patients with GEAC using baseline, 3-6-month, and 6-12-month postoperative CTs. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Cox regression assessed the association between (1) BC at baseline and mortality and (2) the decrease in BC between baseline and follow-up scans and mortality/DFS. RESULTS Model performance was high with Dice coefficients ≥0.94 ± 0.06. Among 299 patients with GEAC (age 63.0 ± 10.7 years; 19.4% female), 140 deaths (47%) occurred over a median follow-up of 31.3 months. At baseline, no BC measure was associated with DFS. Only a substantial decrease in VAT >70% after a 6- to 12-month follow-up was associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99 [95% CI, 1.18 to 3.34]; P = .009) and DFS (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.01 to 2.95]; P = .045) independent of age, sex, BMI, Union for International Cancer Control stage, histologic grading, resection status, neoadjuvant therapy, and time between surgery and follow-up CT. CONCLUSION DL enables opportunistic estimation of BC from routine staging CT to quantify prognostic information. In patients with GEAC, only a substantial decrease of VAT 6-12 months postsurgery was an independent predictor for DFS beyond traditional risk factors, which may help to identify individuals at high risk who go otherwise unnoticed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
期刊最新文献
Increasing Power in Phase III Oncology Trials With Multivariable Regression: An Empirical Assessment of 535 Primary End Point Analyses. Validation of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clinical Insights Using a Generalized Oncology Natural Language Processing Model. Interinstitutional Approach to Advancing Geospatial Technologies for US Cancer Centers. Classification and Regression Trees to Predict for Survival for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab. Cureit: An End-to-End Pipeline for Implementing Mixture Cure Models With an Application to Liposarcoma Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1