下腔静脉滤器:概念回顾和现行指南摘要。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Vascular pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1016/j.vph.2024.107375
Luca Visconti , Alessandro Celi , Laura Carrozzi , Camilla Tinelli , Laura Crocetti , Francesco Daviddi , Raffaele De Caterina , Rosalinda Madonna , Roberta Pancani
{"title":"下腔静脉滤器:概念回顾和现行指南摘要。","authors":"Luca Visconti ,&nbsp;Alessandro Celi ,&nbsp;Laura Carrozzi ,&nbsp;Camilla Tinelli ,&nbsp;Laura Crocetti ,&nbsp;Francesco Daviddi ,&nbsp;Raffaele De Caterina ,&nbsp;Rosalinda Madonna ,&nbsp;Roberta Pancani","doi":"10.1016/j.vph.2024.107375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Anticoagulation is the first-line approach in the prevention and treatment of pulmonary embolism. In some instances, however, anticoagulation fails, or cannot be administered due to a high risk of bleeding. Inferior vena cava filters are metal alloy devices that mechanically trap emboli from the deep leg veins halting their transit to the pulmonary circulation, thus providing a mechanical alternative to anticoagulation in such conditions. The Greenfield filter was developed in 1973 and was later perfected to a model that could be inserted percutaneously. Since then, this model has been the reference standard. The current class I indication for this device includes absolute contraindication to anticoagulants in the presence of acute thromboembolism and recurrent thromboembolism despite adequate therapy. Additional indications have been more recently proposed, due to the development of removable filters and of progressively less invasive techniques.</p><p>Although the use of inferior vena cava filters has solid theoretical advantages, clinical efficacy and adverse event profile are still unclear. This review analyzes the most important studies related to such devices, open issues, and current guideline recommendations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23949,"journal":{"name":"Vascular pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1537189124001010/pdfft?md5=5af3f298e6e417f91a52189892af40fc&pid=1-s2.0-S1537189124001010-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inferior vena cava filters: Concept review and summary of current guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Luca Visconti ,&nbsp;Alessandro Celi ,&nbsp;Laura Carrozzi ,&nbsp;Camilla Tinelli ,&nbsp;Laura Crocetti ,&nbsp;Francesco Daviddi ,&nbsp;Raffaele De Caterina ,&nbsp;Rosalinda Madonna ,&nbsp;Roberta Pancani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vph.2024.107375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Anticoagulation is the first-line approach in the prevention and treatment of pulmonary embolism. In some instances, however, anticoagulation fails, or cannot be administered due to a high risk of bleeding. Inferior vena cava filters are metal alloy devices that mechanically trap emboli from the deep leg veins halting their transit to the pulmonary circulation, thus providing a mechanical alternative to anticoagulation in such conditions. The Greenfield filter was developed in 1973 and was later perfected to a model that could be inserted percutaneously. Since then, this model has been the reference standard. The current class I indication for this device includes absolute contraindication to anticoagulants in the presence of acute thromboembolism and recurrent thromboembolism despite adequate therapy. Additional indications have been more recently proposed, due to the development of removable filters and of progressively less invasive techniques.</p><p>Although the use of inferior vena cava filters has solid theoretical advantages, clinical efficacy and adverse event profile are still unclear. This review analyzes the most important studies related to such devices, open issues, and current guideline recommendations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1537189124001010/pdfft?md5=5af3f298e6e417f91a52189892af40fc&pid=1-s2.0-S1537189124001010-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1537189124001010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1537189124001010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗凝是预防和治疗肺栓塞的一线方法。但在某些情况下,抗凝治疗会失败,或因出血风险高而无法实施。下腔静脉过滤器是一种金属合金装置,可机械性地捕获来自腿部深静脉的栓子,阻止其进入肺循环,从而在这种情况下提供一种抗凝治疗的机械替代方法。格林菲尔德过滤器开发于 1973 年,后来改进为可经皮插入的型号。从那时起,这种型号一直是参考标准。该设备目前的 I 类适应症包括急性血栓栓塞和接受适当治疗后仍复发血栓栓塞的绝对抗凝禁忌症。虽然下腔静脉滤器的使用具有坚实的理论基础,但其临床疗效和不良反应仍不明确。本综述分析了与此类设备相关的最重要研究、未决问题以及当前的指南建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inferior vena cava filters: Concept review and summary of current guidelines

Anticoagulation is the first-line approach in the prevention and treatment of pulmonary embolism. In some instances, however, anticoagulation fails, or cannot be administered due to a high risk of bleeding. Inferior vena cava filters are metal alloy devices that mechanically trap emboli from the deep leg veins halting their transit to the pulmonary circulation, thus providing a mechanical alternative to anticoagulation in such conditions. The Greenfield filter was developed in 1973 and was later perfected to a model that could be inserted percutaneously. Since then, this model has been the reference standard. The current class I indication for this device includes absolute contraindication to anticoagulants in the presence of acute thromboembolism and recurrent thromboembolism despite adequate therapy. Additional indications have been more recently proposed, due to the development of removable filters and of progressively less invasive techniques.

Although the use of inferior vena cava filters has solid theoretical advantages, clinical efficacy and adverse event profile are still unclear. This review analyzes the most important studies related to such devices, open issues, and current guideline recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular pharmacology
Vascular pharmacology 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Vascular Pharmacology publishes papers, which contains results of all aspects of biology and pharmacology of the vascular system. Papers are encouraged in basic, translational and clinical aspects of Vascular Biology and Pharmacology, utilizing approaches ranging from molecular biology to integrative physiology. All papers are in English. The Journal publishes review articles which include vascular aspects of thrombosis, inflammation, cell signalling, atherosclerosis, and lipid metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Gaps in evidence in the treatment of prevalent patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension at intermediate risk: An expert consensus Editorial Board Contents continued Graphical abstract TOC Graphical abstract TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1