产妇教育程度对出生体重不足的影响:比较视角

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Ssm-Population Health Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101674
Lidia Panico , Alice Goisis , Melissa Martinson
{"title":"产妇教育程度对出生体重不足的影响:比较视角","authors":"Lidia Panico ,&nbsp;Alice Goisis ,&nbsp;Melissa Martinson","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Longstanding research has shown strong inequalities in low birthweight by household income. However, most such research has focused on Anglophone countries, while evidence emerging from other developed countries suggest a stronger role of education rather than incomes in creating inequalities at birth. This paper compares gradients in low birthweight by maternal education, as well as explores underlying mechanisms contributing to these gradients, in France, the United States, and the United Kingdom.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Analyses are based on harmonized data from large, nationally-representative samples from France, UK and US. We use regression models and decomposition methods to explore the relative role of several possible mechanisms in producing birthweight inequalities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Inequalities in low birth weight across maternal education groups were relatively similar in the United States, the United Kingdom and France. However, the individual-level mechanisms producing such inequalities varied substantially across the three countries, with income being most important in the US, pregnancy smoking being most evident in France, and the UK occupying an intermediate position. Differences in the mechanisms producing birth health inequalities mirror differences in the policy environment in the three countries.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While inequalities in health appear from the earliest moments in many countries, our results suggest research on birth health inequalities, and therefore policies, is not easily generalizable across national contexts, and call for more scholarship in uncovering the “whys” of health inequalities in a variety of contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47780,"journal":{"name":"Ssm-Population Health","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101674"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000752/pdfft?md5=6a39efad0600f98582f60ddd9bfb79e5&pid=1-s2.0-S2352827324000752-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gradients in low birthweight by maternal education: A comparative perspective\",\"authors\":\"Lidia Panico ,&nbsp;Alice Goisis ,&nbsp;Melissa Martinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Longstanding research has shown strong inequalities in low birthweight by household income. However, most such research has focused on Anglophone countries, while evidence emerging from other developed countries suggest a stronger role of education rather than incomes in creating inequalities at birth. This paper compares gradients in low birthweight by maternal education, as well as explores underlying mechanisms contributing to these gradients, in France, the United States, and the United Kingdom.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Analyses are based on harmonized data from large, nationally-representative samples from France, UK and US. We use regression models and decomposition methods to explore the relative role of several possible mechanisms in producing birthweight inequalities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Inequalities in low birth weight across maternal education groups were relatively similar in the United States, the United Kingdom and France. However, the individual-level mechanisms producing such inequalities varied substantially across the three countries, with income being most important in the US, pregnancy smoking being most evident in France, and the UK occupying an intermediate position. Differences in the mechanisms producing birth health inequalities mirror differences in the policy environment in the three countries.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While inequalities in health appear from the earliest moments in many countries, our results suggest research on birth health inequalities, and therefore policies, is not easily generalizable across national contexts, and call for more scholarship in uncovering the “whys” of health inequalities in a variety of contexts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ssm-Population Health\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000752/pdfft?md5=6a39efad0600f98582f60ddd9bfb79e5&pid=1-s2.0-S2352827324000752-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ssm-Population Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000752\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ssm-Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000752","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景长期以来的研究表明,出生体重不足与家庭收入密切相关。然而,大多数此类研究都集中在英语国家,而其他发达国家的证据表明,在造成出生不平等方面,教育的作用比收入的作用更大。本文比较了法国、美国和英国产妇受教育程度在低出生体重方面的梯度,并探讨了造成这些梯度的潜在机制。方法分析基于法国、英国和美国具有全国代表性的大型样本的统一数据。我们使用回归模型和分解方法探讨了几种可能的机制在造成出生体重不平等中的相对作用。结果在美国、英国和法国,不同母亲教育程度群体的低出生体重不平等现象相对相似。然而,产生这种不平等的个人层面机制在这三个国家之间存在很大差异,美国的收入最为重要,法国的妊娠吸烟最为明显,而英国则处于中间位置。尽管许多国家从一开始就出现了健康不平等,但我们的研究结果表明,有关出生健康不平等的研究以及相应的政策并不容易在不同国家的背景下推广,因此需要更多的研究来揭示不同背景下健康不平等的 "原因"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gradients in low birthweight by maternal education: A comparative perspective

Background

Longstanding research has shown strong inequalities in low birthweight by household income. However, most such research has focused on Anglophone countries, while evidence emerging from other developed countries suggest a stronger role of education rather than incomes in creating inequalities at birth. This paper compares gradients in low birthweight by maternal education, as well as explores underlying mechanisms contributing to these gradients, in France, the United States, and the United Kingdom.

Methods

Analyses are based on harmonized data from large, nationally-representative samples from France, UK and US. We use regression models and decomposition methods to explore the relative role of several possible mechanisms in producing birthweight inequalities.

Results

Inequalities in low birth weight across maternal education groups were relatively similar in the United States, the United Kingdom and France. However, the individual-level mechanisms producing such inequalities varied substantially across the three countries, with income being most important in the US, pregnancy smoking being most evident in France, and the UK occupying an intermediate position. Differences in the mechanisms producing birth health inequalities mirror differences in the policy environment in the three countries.

Conclusion

While inequalities in health appear from the earliest moments in many countries, our results suggest research on birth health inequalities, and therefore policies, is not easily generalizable across national contexts, and call for more scholarship in uncovering the “whys” of health inequalities in a variety of contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ssm-Population Health
Ssm-Population Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
298
审稿时长
101 days
期刊介绍: SSM - Population Health. The new online only, open access, peer reviewed journal in all areas relating Social Science research to population health. SSM - Population Health shares the same Editors-in Chief and general approach to manuscripts as its sister journal, Social Science & Medicine. The journal takes a broad approach to the field especially welcoming interdisciplinary papers from across the Social Sciences and allied areas. SSM - Population Health offers an alternative outlet for work which might not be considered, or is classed as ''out of scope'' elsewhere, and prioritizes fast peer review and publication to the benefit of authors and readers. The journal welcomes all types of paper from traditional primary research articles, replication studies, short communications, methodological studies, instrument validation, opinion pieces, literature reviews, etc. SSM - Population Health also offers the opportunity to publish special issues or sections to reflect current interest and research in topical or developing areas. The journal fully supports authors wanting to present their research in an innovative fashion though the use of multimedia formats.
期刊最新文献
Spatial accessibility to gun violence exposure on walkable routes to and from school Associations of objective and subjective relative deprivation with health, happiness, and life satisfaction Against the grain: International migrants, the children of migrants and national life expectancy in Sweden, 1990–2019 Cross national patterns in educational inequalities in functional limitations among middle aged and older adults at two time points Barriers to child vaccination: The role of international sanctions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1