Waqas Anjum, Abdul Rehman, Ayesha Saleem, Muhammad Ayyub Anjum, Shahbaz Hussain, Mubashar Abrar
{"title":"腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的腰四肌阻滞:单中心研究","authors":"Waqas Anjum, Abdul Rehman, Ayesha Saleem, Muhammad Ayyub Anjum, Shahbaz Hussain, Mubashar Abrar","doi":"10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.04.7996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of QL block in patients undergoing laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair. Study Design: Randomized Clinical Trial. Setting: Kalsoom International Hospital, Islamabad. Period: Dec 2022 to June 2023. Methods: In this, all patients between the ages of 18 and 70 who were scheduled for laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair to repair a one-sided inguinal hernia and did not have any complications related to the hernia. In one group, the patients received general anesthesia and in the other group, the patients were given sedation along with a technique called QL block. Age, gender, pain score on VAS at 1 hours, 6 hour and 12 hours after procedure was noted. Comparison of pain according to the VAS by type of anesthesia was done between the two groups and independent sample t-test was applied to see the statistical significant. Results: The patients' mean age was 43 + 9.09 years. Around 70% of the patients were males, while 30% were females, indicating a male predominance. The study's outcome was the mean pain score after 1 hour, 6 hours, and 12 hours. The two techniques of anesthesia utilized in the two groups were compared in terms of pain. The mean VAS at 1 hour after the initiation of anesthesia was not significantly different between the two groups, but it was statistically significant at 6 and 12 hours (p value of 0.001). Conclusion: QL block is a safe and effective alternative for patients undergoing TEP inguinal repair because to the observed reduction in early postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, and cheaper anesthetic and hospital costs. Although our research showed that pain was significantly reduced for up to 12 hours after the operation, more information is needed before we can confidently endorse it for widespread use.","PeriodicalId":22991,"journal":{"name":"The professional medical journal","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quadratus lumborum block in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A single center study.\",\"authors\":\"Waqas Anjum, Abdul Rehman, Ayesha Saleem, Muhammad Ayyub Anjum, Shahbaz Hussain, Mubashar Abrar\",\"doi\":\"10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.04.7996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of QL block in patients undergoing laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair. Study Design: Randomized Clinical Trial. Setting: Kalsoom International Hospital, Islamabad. Period: Dec 2022 to June 2023. Methods: In this, all patients between the ages of 18 and 70 who were scheduled for laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair to repair a one-sided inguinal hernia and did not have any complications related to the hernia. In one group, the patients received general anesthesia and in the other group, the patients were given sedation along with a technique called QL block. Age, gender, pain score on VAS at 1 hours, 6 hour and 12 hours after procedure was noted. Comparison of pain according to the VAS by type of anesthesia was done between the two groups and independent sample t-test was applied to see the statistical significant. Results: The patients' mean age was 43 + 9.09 years. Around 70% of the patients were males, while 30% were females, indicating a male predominance. The study's outcome was the mean pain score after 1 hour, 6 hours, and 12 hours. The two techniques of anesthesia utilized in the two groups were compared in terms of pain. The mean VAS at 1 hour after the initiation of anesthesia was not significantly different between the two groups, but it was statistically significant at 6 and 12 hours (p value of 0.001). Conclusion: QL block is a safe and effective alternative for patients undergoing TEP inguinal repair because to the observed reduction in early postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, and cheaper anesthetic and hospital costs. Although our research showed that pain was significantly reduced for up to 12 hours after the operation, more information is needed before we can confidently endorse it for widespread use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The professional medical journal\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The professional medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.04.7996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The professional medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.04.7996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估 QL 阻滞对腹腔镜 TEP 腹股沟疝修补术患者的疗效:评估 QL 阻滞对腹腔镜 TEP 腹股沟疝修补术患者的疗效。研究设计:随机临床试验。地点: 伊斯兰堡卡尔索姆国际医院伊斯兰堡卡尔索姆国际医院。时间: 2022年12月至2023年6月2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 6 月。方法:随机所有年龄在 18 岁至 70 岁之间、计划接受腹腔镜 TEP 腹股沟疝修补术以修补单侧腹股沟疝且无任何相关并发症的患者。其中一组患者接受了全身麻醉,另一组患者在镇静的同时接受了一种名为 QL 阻滞的技术。记录了患者的年龄、性别、术后 1 小时、6 小时和 12 小时的 VAS 疼痛评分。根据麻醉类型的 VAS 对两组患者的疼痛情况进行比较,并应用独立样本 t 检验来确定其统计学意义。结果患者的平均年龄为 43 + 9.09 岁。约 70% 的患者为男性,30% 为女性,表明男性占主导地位。研究结果为 1 小时、6 小时和 12 小时后的平均疼痛评分。两组患者采用的两种麻醉技术在疼痛方面进行了比较。麻醉开始后 1 小时的平均 VAS 在两组之间没有明显差异,但在 6 小时和 12 小时后有统计学意义(P 值为 0.001)。结论QL阻滞对接受 TEP 腹股沟修补术的患者来说是一种安全有效的替代方法,因为观察到术后早期疼痛减轻,住院时间缩短,麻醉和住院费用降低。虽然我们的研究表明,术后 12 小时内疼痛明显减轻,但我们还需要获得更多信息,才能放心地将其广泛应用。
Quadratus lumborum block in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A single center study.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of QL block in patients undergoing laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair. Study Design: Randomized Clinical Trial. Setting: Kalsoom International Hospital, Islamabad. Period: Dec 2022 to June 2023. Methods: In this, all patients between the ages of 18 and 70 who were scheduled for laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair to repair a one-sided inguinal hernia and did not have any complications related to the hernia. In one group, the patients received general anesthesia and in the other group, the patients were given sedation along with a technique called QL block. Age, gender, pain score on VAS at 1 hours, 6 hour and 12 hours after procedure was noted. Comparison of pain according to the VAS by type of anesthesia was done between the two groups and independent sample t-test was applied to see the statistical significant. Results: The patients' mean age was 43 + 9.09 years. Around 70% of the patients were males, while 30% were females, indicating a male predominance. The study's outcome was the mean pain score after 1 hour, 6 hours, and 12 hours. The two techniques of anesthesia utilized in the two groups were compared in terms of pain. The mean VAS at 1 hour after the initiation of anesthesia was not significantly different between the two groups, but it was statistically significant at 6 and 12 hours (p value of 0.001). Conclusion: QL block is a safe and effective alternative for patients undergoing TEP inguinal repair because to the observed reduction in early postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, and cheaper anesthetic and hospital costs. Although our research showed that pain was significantly reduced for up to 12 hours after the operation, more information is needed before we can confidently endorse it for widespread use.