Debi Bhattacharya , Kumud Kantilal , Jacqueline Martin-Kerry , Vanessa Millar , Allan Clark , David Wright , Katherine Murphy , David Turner , Sion Scott
{"title":"开发一套核心结果,用于评估针对初级保健中长期用药的成人的用药依从性干预措施。","authors":"Debi Bhattacharya , Kumud Kantilal , Jacqueline Martin-Kerry , Vanessa Millar , Allan Clark , David Wright , Katherine Murphy , David Turner , Sion Scott","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Approximately half of people prescribed medications do not take them as prescribed. There is a significant unmet need regarding the barriers to medication adherence not being addressed in primary care. There is no agreement on which outcomes should be measured and reported in trials of medication adherence interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop a core outcome set (COS) for trials of medication adherence interventions in primary care for adults prescribed medications for long-term health conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A list of potentially relevant outcomes from the literature was developed. Using a two-round Delphi survey of stakeholder groups representing patients and their carers; primary care staff; and academic researchers with an interest in medication adherence; each outcome was scored in terms of importance for determining the effectiveness of medication adherence interventions in primary care. This was followed by two consensus workshops, where importance, as well as feasibility and acceptability of measurement, were considered in order to finalise the COS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred and fifty people took part in Delphi Round 1 and 101 took part in Round 2. Eight people attended the workshops (four attendees per workshop). Seven outcomes were identified as most important, feasible and acceptable to collect in medication adherence trials: Health-related quality of life, number of doses taken, persistence with medicines, starting (initiating) a medicine, relevance of the medication adherence intervention for an individual, mortality, and adverse medicine events.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This COS represents the minimum outcomes that should be collected and reported in all medication adherence trials undertaken in primary care. When developing and finalizing the COS, feasibility and acceptability of collection of outcomes has been considered. In addition to the COS, medication adherence trials can choose to include outcomes to suit their specific context such as the health condition associated with their medication adherence intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":"20 7","pages":"Pages 625-632"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124001165/pdfft?md5=6253919c4c63b531117c717eb6925d25&pid=1-s2.0-S1551741124001165-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a core outcome set for evaluating medication adherence interventions for adults prescribed long-term medication in primary care\",\"authors\":\"Debi Bhattacharya , Kumud Kantilal , Jacqueline Martin-Kerry , Vanessa Millar , Allan Clark , David Wright , Katherine Murphy , David Turner , Sion Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Approximately half of people prescribed medications do not take them as prescribed. There is a significant unmet need regarding the barriers to medication adherence not being addressed in primary care. There is no agreement on which outcomes should be measured and reported in trials of medication adherence interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop a core outcome set (COS) for trials of medication adherence interventions in primary care for adults prescribed medications for long-term health conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A list of potentially relevant outcomes from the literature was developed. Using a two-round Delphi survey of stakeholder groups representing patients and their carers; primary care staff; and academic researchers with an interest in medication adherence; each outcome was scored in terms of importance for determining the effectiveness of medication adherence interventions in primary care. This was followed by two consensus workshops, where importance, as well as feasibility and acceptability of measurement, were considered in order to finalise the COS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred and fifty people took part in Delphi Round 1 and 101 took part in Round 2. Eight people attended the workshops (four attendees per workshop). Seven outcomes were identified as most important, feasible and acceptable to collect in medication adherence trials: Health-related quality of life, number of doses taken, persistence with medicines, starting (initiating) a medicine, relevance of the medication adherence intervention for an individual, mortality, and adverse medicine events.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This COS represents the minimum outcomes that should be collected and reported in all medication adherence trials undertaken in primary care. When developing and finalizing the COS, feasibility and acceptability of collection of outcomes has been considered. In addition to the COS, medication adherence trials can choose to include outcomes to suit their specific context such as the health condition associated with their medication adherence intervention.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 625-632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124001165/pdfft?md5=6253919c4c63b531117c717eb6925d25&pid=1-s2.0-S1551741124001165-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124001165\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124001165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景约有一半的处方药使用者没有遵医嘱服药。基层医疗机构没有解决影响坚持用药的障碍,因此存在大量未满足的需求。方法从文献中整理出一份潜在相关结果的清单。通过对代表患者及其护理者、初级医疗人员和对用药依从性感兴趣的学术研究人员的利益相关者群体进行两轮德尔菲调查,对每项结果在确定初级医疗中用药依从性干预有效性方面的重要性进行评分。随后召开了两次共识研讨会,对重要性以及测量的可行性和可接受性进行了审议,以最终确定 COS。8 人参加了研讨会(每个研讨会 4 人)。有七项结果被认为是在用药依从性试验中最重要、最可行和最容易接受的:结论本 COS 代表了在基层医疗机构开展的所有用药依从性试验中应收集和报告的最低结果。在制定和最终确定 COS 时,我们考虑了收集结果的可行性和可接受性。除 COS 外,用药依从性试验还可根据其具体情况(如与用药依从性干预措施相关的健康状况)选择纳入相应的结果。
Developing a core outcome set for evaluating medication adherence interventions for adults prescribed long-term medication in primary care
Background
Approximately half of people prescribed medications do not take them as prescribed. There is a significant unmet need regarding the barriers to medication adherence not being addressed in primary care. There is no agreement on which outcomes should be measured and reported in trials of medication adherence interventions.
Objective
To develop a core outcome set (COS) for trials of medication adherence interventions in primary care for adults prescribed medications for long-term health conditions.
Methods
A list of potentially relevant outcomes from the literature was developed. Using a two-round Delphi survey of stakeholder groups representing patients and their carers; primary care staff; and academic researchers with an interest in medication adherence; each outcome was scored in terms of importance for determining the effectiveness of medication adherence interventions in primary care. This was followed by two consensus workshops, where importance, as well as feasibility and acceptability of measurement, were considered in order to finalise the COS.
Results
One hundred and fifty people took part in Delphi Round 1 and 101 took part in Round 2. Eight people attended the workshops (four attendees per workshop). Seven outcomes were identified as most important, feasible and acceptable to collect in medication adherence trials: Health-related quality of life, number of doses taken, persistence with medicines, starting (initiating) a medicine, relevance of the medication adherence intervention for an individual, mortality, and adverse medicine events.
Conclusions
This COS represents the minimum outcomes that should be collected and reported in all medication adherence trials undertaken in primary care. When developing and finalizing the COS, feasibility and acceptability of collection of outcomes has been considered. In addition to the COS, medication adherence trials can choose to include outcomes to suit their specific context such as the health condition associated with their medication adherence intervention.
期刊介绍:
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.