111 评估患者对临床空间中 LGBTQIA2+ 患者舒适度的影响(EPIC)

G. Lee, Bashar Shihabuddin, C. Shihabuddin
{"title":"111 评估患者对临床空间中 LGBTQIA2+ 患者舒适度的影响(EPIC)","authors":"G. Lee, Bashar Shihabuddin, C. Shihabuddin","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objective of this project was to evaluate the factors that contribute to LGBTQIA2+ patient comfortability. This information was then used to understand how best to create a comfortable space for LGBTQIA2+ patients. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This survey was focused on underinsured and uninsured patients seen at the Rainbow Clinic - a free student-run LGBTQIA2+ clinic. Surveys were distributed by undergraduate volunteers on tablets as a qualtrics survey. Surveys collected demographic information in addition to 5 questions that assessed patient comfortability. These questions included evaluating the patient’s comfort with sharing information with the provider and the patient’s comfort of coming into clinical spaces. These surveys were distributed before and after clinic appointments to capture any changes in comfortability that could have occurred as a result of the appointment. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Up to May of 2023, 49 patients were seen in Rainbow Clinic. 33 patients filled out the intake survey and 31 patients filled out the check-out survey resulting in a 67% and 63% response rate respectively. Questions were asked on a likert scale (1-5) from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree. Questions evaluating patient comfort in sharing information with their provider yielded an average score that was statistically significant, suggesting patients felt comfortable at the Rainbow Clinic. Additionally, patients indicated that the LGBTQIA2+ specific labeling of the Rainbow Clinic made them significantly more comfortable coming into the clinic. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This project suggests that patient comfortability can be improved by training and intentional LGBTQIA2+ labeling. Considering the hesitancy of this community towards healthcare, improving comfortability not only benefits clinical care and outcomes but can also bolster the body of research on this community.","PeriodicalId":508693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"36 6","pages":"32 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"111 Evaluating Patient Influences on Comfortability for LGBTQIA2+ Patients in Clinical Spaces (EPIC)\",\"authors\":\"G. Lee, Bashar Shihabuddin, C. Shihabuddin\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cts.2024.109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objective of this project was to evaluate the factors that contribute to LGBTQIA2+ patient comfortability. This information was then used to understand how best to create a comfortable space for LGBTQIA2+ patients. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This survey was focused on underinsured and uninsured patients seen at the Rainbow Clinic - a free student-run LGBTQIA2+ clinic. Surveys were distributed by undergraduate volunteers on tablets as a qualtrics survey. Surveys collected demographic information in addition to 5 questions that assessed patient comfortability. These questions included evaluating the patient’s comfort with sharing information with the provider and the patient’s comfort of coming into clinical spaces. These surveys were distributed before and after clinic appointments to capture any changes in comfortability that could have occurred as a result of the appointment. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Up to May of 2023, 49 patients were seen in Rainbow Clinic. 33 patients filled out the intake survey and 31 patients filled out the check-out survey resulting in a 67% and 63% response rate respectively. Questions were asked on a likert scale (1-5) from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree. Questions evaluating patient comfort in sharing information with their provider yielded an average score that was statistically significant, suggesting patients felt comfortable at the Rainbow Clinic. Additionally, patients indicated that the LGBTQIA2+ specific labeling of the Rainbow Clinic made them significantly more comfortable coming into the clinic. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This project suggests that patient comfortability can be improved by training and intentional LGBTQIA2+ labeling. Considering the hesitancy of this community towards healthcare, improving comfortability not only benefits clinical care and outcomes but can also bolster the body of research on this community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"36 6\",\"pages\":\"32 - 32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/目标:本项目旨在评估导致 LGBTQIA2+ 患者舒适度的因素。然后利用这些信息了解如何最好地为 LGBTQIA2+ 患者创造舒适的就医环境。方法/研究对象:本调查主要针对在彩虹诊所(一家由学生运营的免费 LGBTQIA2+ 诊所)就诊的保险不足和无保险的患者。调查表由本科生志愿者在平板电脑上以 qualtrics 调查表的形式分发。调查除收集人口统计学信息外,还收集了 5 个评估患者舒适度的问题。这些问题包括评估患者与医疗服务提供者分享信息的舒适度以及患者进入临床空间的舒适度。这些调查问卷在门诊预约前后发放,以了解预约可能导致的舒适度变化。结果/预期结果:截至 2023 年 5 月,共有 49 名患者在彩虹诊所就诊。33 名患者填写了入院调查表,31 名患者填写了出院调查表,回复率分别为 67% 和 63%。调查问题采用从 "非常不同意 "到 "非常同意 "的李克特量表(1-5)。在评估患者是否愿意与医疗服务提供者分享信息的问题上,平均得分具有统计学意义,这表明患者在彩虹诊所感到舒适。此外,患者还表示,彩虹门诊的 LGBTQIA2+ 专属标签让他们在就诊时倍感舒适。讨论/意义:该项目表明,可以通过培训和有意识的 LGBTQIA2+ 标签来提高患者的舒适度。考虑到该群体对医疗保健的犹豫不决,提高舒适度不仅有利于临床护理和结果,还能加强对该群体的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
111 Evaluating Patient Influences on Comfortability for LGBTQIA2+ Patients in Clinical Spaces (EPIC)
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objective of this project was to evaluate the factors that contribute to LGBTQIA2+ patient comfortability. This information was then used to understand how best to create a comfortable space for LGBTQIA2+ patients. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This survey was focused on underinsured and uninsured patients seen at the Rainbow Clinic - a free student-run LGBTQIA2+ clinic. Surveys were distributed by undergraduate volunteers on tablets as a qualtrics survey. Surveys collected demographic information in addition to 5 questions that assessed patient comfortability. These questions included evaluating the patient’s comfort with sharing information with the provider and the patient’s comfort of coming into clinical spaces. These surveys were distributed before and after clinic appointments to capture any changes in comfortability that could have occurred as a result of the appointment. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Up to May of 2023, 49 patients were seen in Rainbow Clinic. 33 patients filled out the intake survey and 31 patients filled out the check-out survey resulting in a 67% and 63% response rate respectively. Questions were asked on a likert scale (1-5) from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree. Questions evaluating patient comfort in sharing information with their provider yielded an average score that was statistically significant, suggesting patients felt comfortable at the Rainbow Clinic. Additionally, patients indicated that the LGBTQIA2+ specific labeling of the Rainbow Clinic made them significantly more comfortable coming into the clinic. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This project suggests that patient comfortability can be improved by training and intentional LGBTQIA2+ labeling. Considering the hesitancy of this community towards healthcare, improving comfortability not only benefits clinical care and outcomes but can also bolster the body of research on this community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in self-confidence in professional, personal and scientific skills by gender during physician scientist training at the University of Pittsburgh Developing a Bayesian Workshop for Full-time Staff Statisticians Inpatient Screening for Social Determinants of Health: A Quality Improvement Initiative The Epidemiology of Errors in Data Capture, Management, and Analysis: A Scoping Review of Retracted Articles and Retraction Notices in Clinical and Translational Research Interactive Visualization Tool to Understand and Monitor Health Disparities in Diabetes Care and Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1