与 ANCA 阳性相关的间质性肺病:与具有自身免疫特征的间质性肺炎不同的疾病谱

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiratory Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101111
Wenyan Zhu , Chunsheng Zhou , Xin Sun , Peijun Xue , Zongru Li , Weihong Zhang , Jiuliang Zhao , Ting Zhang , Min Peng , Juhong Shi , Chen Wang
{"title":"与 ANCA 阳性相关的间质性肺病:与具有自身免疫特征的间质性肺炎不同的疾病谱","authors":"Wenyan Zhu ,&nbsp;Chunsheng Zhou ,&nbsp;Xin Sun ,&nbsp;Peijun Xue ,&nbsp;Zongru Li ,&nbsp;Weihong Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiuliang Zhao ,&nbsp;Ting Zhang ,&nbsp;Min Peng ,&nbsp;Juhong Shi ,&nbsp;Chen Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) is a type of autoantibodies associated with vasculitis. ANCA positivity is commonly observed in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. 7%-10% of ANCA-positive ILD patients don't present any symptoms of systemic vasculitis and are termed ANCA-positive idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (ANCA-IIP). Some researchers propose that ANCA-IIP should be categorized as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF), although the official ATS/ERS statements exclude ANCA-IIP from this classification. Whether ANCA-IIP should be categorized into the entity of IPAF is still debatable.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients diagnosed with ANCA-IIP and those with IPAF were analyzed in a retrospective study of ILD. The clinical outcomes were determined through pulmonary function tests (PFTs) after a one-year follow-up, as well as assessing all-cause mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>27 patients with ANCA-IIP and 143 patients with IPAF were analyzed from a cohort of 995 patients with ILD. Patients in the ANCA-IIP group had an older age and a high proportion of males compared to those in the IPAF group. PFT results at baseline were similar between the two groups, except for a better FEV1% in the ANCA-IIP group. Glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy improved pulmonary function in patients with IPAF, but it continued to deteriorate after one year of treatment in the ANCA-IIP group. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in the ANCA-IIP group than in the IPAF group (22.2% vs. 6.3%, <em>P</em> = 0.017).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The responses to glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy differ between the ANCA-IIP and IPAF groups, leading to divergent prognoses. Therefore, it is inappropriate to classify ANCA-IIP as part of IPAF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48479,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interstitial lung diseases associated with ANCA positivity: A different disease spectrum from interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features\",\"authors\":\"Wenyan Zhu ,&nbsp;Chunsheng Zhou ,&nbsp;Xin Sun ,&nbsp;Peijun Xue ,&nbsp;Zongru Li ,&nbsp;Weihong Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiuliang Zhao ,&nbsp;Ting Zhang ,&nbsp;Min Peng ,&nbsp;Juhong Shi ,&nbsp;Chen Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) is a type of autoantibodies associated with vasculitis. ANCA positivity is commonly observed in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. 7%-10% of ANCA-positive ILD patients don't present any symptoms of systemic vasculitis and are termed ANCA-positive idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (ANCA-IIP). Some researchers propose that ANCA-IIP should be categorized as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF), although the official ATS/ERS statements exclude ANCA-IIP from this classification. Whether ANCA-IIP should be categorized into the entity of IPAF is still debatable.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients diagnosed with ANCA-IIP and those with IPAF were analyzed in a retrospective study of ILD. The clinical outcomes were determined through pulmonary function tests (PFTs) after a one-year follow-up, as well as assessing all-cause mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>27 patients with ANCA-IIP and 143 patients with IPAF were analyzed from a cohort of 995 patients with ILD. Patients in the ANCA-IIP group had an older age and a high proportion of males compared to those in the IPAF group. PFT results at baseline were similar between the two groups, except for a better FEV1% in the ANCA-IIP group. Glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy improved pulmonary function in patients with IPAF, but it continued to deteriorate after one year of treatment in the ANCA-IIP group. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in the ANCA-IIP group than in the IPAF group (22.2% vs. 6.3%, <em>P</em> = 0.017).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The responses to glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy differ between the ANCA-IIP and IPAF groups, leading to divergent prognoses. Therefore, it is inappropriate to classify ANCA-IIP as part of IPAF.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Medicine and Research\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Medicine and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590041224000278\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590041224000278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)是一种与血管炎相关的自身抗体。ANCA阳性常见于间质性肺病(ILD)患者。7%-10%的ANCA阳性ILD患者没有任何全身性血管炎的症状,被称为ANCA阳性特发性间质性肺炎(ANCA-IIP)。一些研究人员建议将 ANCA-IIP 归类为具有自身免疫特征的间质性肺炎(IPAF),尽管 ATS/ERS 的官方声明将 ANCA-IIP 排除在这一分类之外。在一项关于 ILD 的回顾性研究中,对确诊为 ANCA-IIP 和 IPAF 的患者进行了分析。结果分析了995名ILD患者中的27名ANCA-IIP患者和143名IPAF患者。与IPAF组患者相比,ANCA-IIP组患者年龄较大,男性比例较高。除了ANCA-IIP组患者的FEV1%更高外,两组患者基线时的PFT结果相似。糖皮质激素和免疫抑制剂治疗改善了IPAF患者的肺功能,但ANCA-IIP组患者的肺功能在治疗一年后继续恶化。此外,ANCA-IIP 组的全因死亡率明显高于 IPAF 组(22.2% vs. 6.3%,P = 0.017)。因此,将 ANCA-IIP 归为 IPAF 的一部分是不恰当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interstitial lung diseases associated with ANCA positivity: A different disease spectrum from interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features

Background

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) is a type of autoantibodies associated with vasculitis. ANCA positivity is commonly observed in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. 7%-10% of ANCA-positive ILD patients don't present any symptoms of systemic vasculitis and are termed ANCA-positive idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (ANCA-IIP). Some researchers propose that ANCA-IIP should be categorized as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF), although the official ATS/ERS statements exclude ANCA-IIP from this classification. Whether ANCA-IIP should be categorized into the entity of IPAF is still debatable.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with ANCA-IIP and those with IPAF were analyzed in a retrospective study of ILD. The clinical outcomes were determined through pulmonary function tests (PFTs) after a one-year follow-up, as well as assessing all-cause mortality.

Results

27 patients with ANCA-IIP and 143 patients with IPAF were analyzed from a cohort of 995 patients with ILD. Patients in the ANCA-IIP group had an older age and a high proportion of males compared to those in the IPAF group. PFT results at baseline were similar between the two groups, except for a better FEV1% in the ANCA-IIP group. Glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy improved pulmonary function in patients with IPAF, but it continued to deteriorate after one year of treatment in the ANCA-IIP group. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in the ANCA-IIP group than in the IPAF group (22.2% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.017).

Conclusion

The responses to glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy differ between the ANCA-IIP and IPAF groups, leading to divergent prognoses. Therefore, it is inappropriate to classify ANCA-IIP as part of IPAF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory Medicine and Research
Respiratory Medicine and Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of convalescent plasma for the treatment of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients: A multicenter French study. Prognosis of incidental lung cancer in lung transplant candidates. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD) with inflammatory component (EvER-ILD2): A multicentre double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Pleural ultrasound for pneumothorax diagnosis after computerised tomography-guided biopsy Physical activity and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A prospective cohort study in UK Biobank and Mendelian randomization analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1