挪威的小细胞肺癌:各卫生保健区的治疗模式和生存趋势

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical lung cancer Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.002
Yngvar Nilssen , Odd Terje Brustugun , Lars Fjellbirkeland , Bjørn Henning Grønberg , Per Magnus Haram , Nina Helbekkmo , Åslaug Helland , Sissel Gyrid Freim Wahl , Marianne Aanerud , Steinar Solberg
{"title":"挪威的小细胞肺癌:各卫生保健区的治疗模式和生存趋势","authors":"Yngvar Nilssen ,&nbsp;Odd Terje Brustugun ,&nbsp;Lars Fjellbirkeland ,&nbsp;Bjørn Henning Grønberg ,&nbsp;Per Magnus Haram ,&nbsp;Nina Helbekkmo ,&nbsp;Åslaug Helland ,&nbsp;Sissel Gyrid Freim Wahl ,&nbsp;Marianne Aanerud ,&nbsp;Steinar Solberg","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/Background</h3><p>There has been a marked survival improvement for patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. We describe the national trends in characteristics and survival, and geographical differences in diagnostic workup, treatment, and survival for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Patients registered with SCLC at the Cancer Registry of Norway in 2002 to 2022 were included. Trends in overall survival were estimated for all SCLC patients, patients with limited stage SCLC, patients undergoing surgery, and by health region. Adjusting for case-mix, a multivariable Cox regression was performed examining the association between health region and death.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 8374 patients. The stage distribution remained unchanged during the study period. The 5-year overall survival increased from 7.7% to 22.8% for patients with limited stage. The use of multidisciplinary team meetings varied from 62.5% to 85.7%, and the use of positron emission tomography-computer tomography varied from 70.4% to 86.2% between the health regions. Treatment patterns differed markedly between the health regions, with the proportion dying without any registered treatment ranging from 1.2% to 10.9%. For limited stage patients in 2018 to 2022, the median overall survival ranged from 16.5 to 25.5 months across health regions, and the 5-year overall survival ranged from 18.7% to 28.7% (<em>P</em> = .019).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The survival for patients with SCLC remains poor. The use of diagnostic procedures, treatment modalities, and survival differed between regions, warranting investigations to further explore the reasons.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424000469/pdfft?md5=4ee53d36e5d86b95a9831a336a40e19c&pid=1-s2.0-S1525730424000469-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Small Cell Lung Cancer in Norway: Patterns of Care by Health Region and Survival Trends\",\"authors\":\"Yngvar Nilssen ,&nbsp;Odd Terje Brustugun ,&nbsp;Lars Fjellbirkeland ,&nbsp;Bjørn Henning Grønberg ,&nbsp;Per Magnus Haram ,&nbsp;Nina Helbekkmo ,&nbsp;Åslaug Helland ,&nbsp;Sissel Gyrid Freim Wahl ,&nbsp;Marianne Aanerud ,&nbsp;Steinar Solberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction/Background</h3><p>There has been a marked survival improvement for patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. We describe the national trends in characteristics and survival, and geographical differences in diagnostic workup, treatment, and survival for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Patients registered with SCLC at the Cancer Registry of Norway in 2002 to 2022 were included. Trends in overall survival were estimated for all SCLC patients, patients with limited stage SCLC, patients undergoing surgery, and by health region. Adjusting for case-mix, a multivariable Cox regression was performed examining the association between health region and death.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 8374 patients. The stage distribution remained unchanged during the study period. The 5-year overall survival increased from 7.7% to 22.8% for patients with limited stage. The use of multidisciplinary team meetings varied from 62.5% to 85.7%, and the use of positron emission tomography-computer tomography varied from 70.4% to 86.2% between the health regions. Treatment patterns differed markedly between the health regions, with the proportion dying without any registered treatment ranging from 1.2% to 10.9%. For limited stage patients in 2018 to 2022, the median overall survival ranged from 16.5 to 25.5 months across health regions, and the 5-year overall survival ranged from 18.7% to 28.7% (<em>P</em> = .019).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The survival for patients with SCLC remains poor. The use of diagnostic procedures, treatment modalities, and survival differed between regions, warranting investigations to further explore the reasons.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424000469/pdfft?md5=4ee53d36e5d86b95a9831a336a40e19c&pid=1-s2.0-S1525730424000469-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424000469\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424000469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言/背景非小细胞肺癌患者的生存率明显提高。我们描述了全国小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者的特征和生存趋势,以及诊断工作、治疗和生存方面的地域差异。对所有SCLC患者、有限分期的SCLC患者、接受手术的患者以及不同医疗地区的总生存率趋势进行了估算。在对病例组合进行调整后,进行了多变量考克斯回归,以检验卫生地区与死亡之间的关系。在研究期间,分期分布保持不变。分期有限的患者的5年总生存率从7.7%上升到22.8%。多学科小组会议的使用率从62.5%到85.7%不等,正电子发射计算机断层扫描的使用率从70.4%到86.2%不等。各卫生区的治疗模式差异明显,未经任何登记治疗而死亡的比例从1.2%到10.9%不等。对于2018至2022年的局限期患者,各卫生区的中位总生存期从16.5个月到25.5个月不等,5年总生存期从18.7%到28.7%不等(P = .019).结论SCLC患者的生存率仍然很低。不同地区在诊断程序的使用、治疗方式和存活率方面存在差异,需要进行调查以进一步探究原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Small Cell Lung Cancer in Norway: Patterns of Care by Health Region and Survival Trends

Introduction/Background

There has been a marked survival improvement for patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. We describe the national trends in characteristics and survival, and geographical differences in diagnostic workup, treatment, and survival for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Materials and Methods

Patients registered with SCLC at the Cancer Registry of Norway in 2002 to 2022 were included. Trends in overall survival were estimated for all SCLC patients, patients with limited stage SCLC, patients undergoing surgery, and by health region. Adjusting for case-mix, a multivariable Cox regression was performed examining the association between health region and death.

Results

The study included 8374 patients. The stage distribution remained unchanged during the study period. The 5-year overall survival increased from 7.7% to 22.8% for patients with limited stage. The use of multidisciplinary team meetings varied from 62.5% to 85.7%, and the use of positron emission tomography-computer tomography varied from 70.4% to 86.2% between the health regions. Treatment patterns differed markedly between the health regions, with the proportion dying without any registered treatment ranging from 1.2% to 10.9%. For limited stage patients in 2018 to 2022, the median overall survival ranged from 16.5 to 25.5 months across health regions, and the 5-year overall survival ranged from 18.7% to 28.7% (P = .019).

Conclusion

The survival for patients with SCLC remains poor. The use of diagnostic procedures, treatment modalities, and survival differed between regions, warranting investigations to further explore the reasons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
A Phase I Open-Label Study of Cediranib Plus Etoposide and Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Identification and Treatment of Lung Cancer Oncogenic Drivers in a Diverse Safety Net Setting Understanding the Social Risk Factors That Avert Equitable Lung Cancer Care Response to Editor: Commentary on “Influence of Tumor Cavitation on Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Anti-PD1 or PD-L1 Inhibitors in Advanced Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma” Letter to the Editor in Response to “Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening in a Centralized Academic Program”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1