局部硅凝胶和聚氨酯敷料对疤痕演变的影响。

{"title":"局部硅凝胶和聚氨酯敷料对疤痕演变的影响。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcle.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the effectiveness and safety of a topical silicone gel<span><span> (BE + Gel reductor y reparador de cicatrices) and a polyurethane dressing (BE + Apósito reductor y reparador de cicatrices) on the evolution of scars of patients who were previously recruited in the emergency care unit while seeking </span>wound care.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A single center, stratified observational, open label study was performed in the emergency care unit of Donostia Universitary Hospital (recruitment) and in the Biodonostia Health Research Institute (intervention). Scars located in unexposed body areas with the dressing, and scars located in exposed areas with either the gel or the dressing. Investigators assessed interventions at day 1 and on weeks 4, 8 and 12. Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and a photographical assessment were used to determine the scars evolution, and the subjective perception of the scar was evaluated by means of a questionnaire administered to the patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients whose scars were treated with the silicone gel<span> had an average initial VSS score of 5.4 ± 2.08. This value was reduced to 0.86 ± 1.17 after 90 days of treatment. Patients treated with the polyurethane dressing had an average initial VSS score of 5.8 ± 2.29. After 90 days of treatment, this average score was reduced to 0.33 ± 0.66. Positive evolution of scars was also supported by photographs and by a patient questionnaire.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both treatments appear to be safe and effective, objectively, and subjectively, in the context of scar evolution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72917,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a topical silicone gel and a polyurethane dressing on the evolution of scars\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfcle.2024.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the effectiveness and safety of a topical silicone gel<span><span> (BE + Gel reductor y reparador de cicatrices) and a polyurethane dressing (BE + Apósito reductor y reparador de cicatrices) on the evolution of scars of patients who were previously recruited in the emergency care unit while seeking </span>wound care.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A single center, stratified observational, open label study was performed in the emergency care unit of Donostia Universitary Hospital (recruitment) and in the Biodonostia Health Research Institute (intervention). Scars located in unexposed body areas with the dressing, and scars located in exposed areas with either the gel or the dressing. Investigators assessed interventions at day 1 and on weeks 4, 8 and 12. Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and a photographical assessment were used to determine the scars evolution, and the subjective perception of the scar was evaluated by means of a questionnaire administered to the patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients whose scars were treated with the silicone gel<span> had an average initial VSS score of 5.4 ± 2.08. This value was reduced to 0.86 ± 1.17 after 90 days of treatment. Patients treated with the polyurethane dressing had an average initial VSS score of 5.8 ± 2.29. After 90 days of treatment, this average score was reduced to 0.33 ± 0.66. Positive evolution of scars was also supported by photographs and by a patient questionnaire.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both treatments appear to be safe and effective, objectively, and subjectively, in the context of scar evolution.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445147924000365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445147924000365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评估外用硅凝胶(BE + Gel reductor y reparador de cicatrices)和聚氨酯敷料(BE + Apósito reductor y reparador de cicatrices)对曾在急诊科就诊并寻求伤口护理的患者疤痕演变的有效性和安全性。方法 在多诺斯蒂亚大学医院急诊科(招募)和 Biodonostia 健康研究所(干预)进行了一项单中心、分层观察、开放标签研究。未暴露部位的疤痕使用敷料,暴露部位的疤痕使用凝胶或敷料。研究人员在第 1 天、第 4 周、第 8 周和第 12 周对干预措施进行评估。研究人员使用温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)和照片评估来确定疤痕的演变情况,并通过向患者发放调查问卷的方式评估他们对疤痕的主观感受。治疗 90 天后,该值降至 0.86 ± 1.17。使用聚氨酯敷料治疗的患者初始 VSS 平均得分为 5.8 ± 2.29。治疗 90 天后,平均得分降至 0.33 ± 0.66。结论从疤痕演变的客观和主观角度来看,两种治疗方法似乎都是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of a topical silicone gel and a polyurethane dressing on the evolution of scars

Objective

To assess the effectiveness and safety of a topical silicone gel (BE + Gel reductor y reparador de cicatrices) and a polyurethane dressing (BE + Apósito reductor y reparador de cicatrices) on the evolution of scars of patients who were previously recruited in the emergency care unit while seeking wound care.

Method

A single center, stratified observational, open label study was performed in the emergency care unit of Donostia Universitary Hospital (recruitment) and in the Biodonostia Health Research Institute (intervention). Scars located in unexposed body areas with the dressing, and scars located in exposed areas with either the gel or the dressing. Investigators assessed interventions at day 1 and on weeks 4, 8 and 12. Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and a photographical assessment were used to determine the scars evolution, and the subjective perception of the scar was evaluated by means of a questionnaire administered to the patients.

Results

Patients whose scars were treated with the silicone gel had an average initial VSS score of 5.4 ± 2.08. This value was reduced to 0.86 ± 1.17 after 90 days of treatment. Patients treated with the polyurethane dressing had an average initial VSS score of 5.8 ± 2.29. After 90 days of treatment, this average score was reduced to 0.33 ± 0.66. Positive evolution of scars was also supported by photographs and by a patient questionnaire.

Conclusions

Both treatments appear to be safe and effective, objectively, and subjectively, in the context of scar evolution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaching the attention to the wish to hustle death. Team reflections. Venipuncture in pediatric emergency department by using koala attachment distraction method: Randomized clinical trial. Patient Satisfaction with Nursing Triage Care in Hospital Emergency Departments: Scoping Review. Professional experience and case management as predictors of nursing good practices directed to the primary caregiver. Impact of nurse-patient interaction levels on nurses' humanistic practice: A cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1