伊朗延期献血者的回返率。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Clinique et Biologique Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1016/j.tracli.2024.04.002
{"title":"伊朗延期献血者的回返率。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tracli.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objectives</h3><p>The process of selecting blood donors is crucial for keeping the health of donors and ensuring the safety of the blood supply. However, it may create unpleasant feeling in those who are deferred. In this study, we aim to explore the return rates of Iranian deferred donors in comparison with eligible donors.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The study included all whole blood donors referred between March 2017 and March 2018, who experienced temporary deferral for any reason. Donors who successfully donated blood during this period were also part of the study. Participants were followed up until their next donation attempt, spanning 4.8 years after initial inclusion. Then odds of return and median return time for both deferred and eligible donors were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 993,824 volunteers, 733,153 (73.77%) were eligible and 192,332 (19.35%) temporary deferred. The return rate in the eligible and deferred donors was 74.77% vs. 51.77%, respectively (OR:2.78; 99%CI: 2.71–2.81). Odds of return among deferred regular (OR = 7.02, 99%CI:6.64–7.42), men (OR: 2.57, 99%CI:2.45–2.69), and over 45 years (OR: 1.15, 99% CI: 1.09–1.20), was higher than first-time, women, and younger donors. The median return time for eligible and deferred donors was 315 (99%CI: 313–316) and 1,467(99%CI: 1,412–1,524) days, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study revealed the negative effect of deferral on the return rate, that led to a 23% reduction in the return of deferred donors. Avoiding unnecessary deferral through adherence to the standard operating procedure of donor selection and effective counselling which clarifies the purpose of deferral and encourages them to return after the deferral period ends are recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23262,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The return rate of deferred blood donors in Iran\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tracli.2024.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Objectives</h3><p>The process of selecting blood donors is crucial for keeping the health of donors and ensuring the safety of the blood supply. However, it may create unpleasant feeling in those who are deferred. In this study, we aim to explore the return rates of Iranian deferred donors in comparison with eligible donors.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The study included all whole blood donors referred between March 2017 and March 2018, who experienced temporary deferral for any reason. Donors who successfully donated blood during this period were also part of the study. Participants were followed up until their next donation attempt, spanning 4.8 years after initial inclusion. Then odds of return and median return time for both deferred and eligible donors were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 993,824 volunteers, 733,153 (73.77%) were eligible and 192,332 (19.35%) temporary deferred. The return rate in the eligible and deferred donors was 74.77% vs. 51.77%, respectively (OR:2.78; 99%CI: 2.71–2.81). Odds of return among deferred regular (OR = 7.02, 99%CI:6.64–7.42), men (OR: 2.57, 99%CI:2.45–2.69), and over 45 years (OR: 1.15, 99% CI: 1.09–1.20), was higher than first-time, women, and younger donors. The median return time for eligible and deferred donors was 315 (99%CI: 313–316) and 1,467(99%CI: 1,412–1,524) days, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study revealed the negative effect of deferral on the return rate, that led to a 23% reduction in the return of deferred donors. Avoiding unnecessary deferral through adherence to the standard operating procedure of donor selection and effective counselling which clarifies the purpose of deferral and encourages them to return after the deferral period ends are recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246782024000569\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246782024000569","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的挑选献血者的过程对于保持献血者的健康和确保血液供应的安全至关重要。然而,这可能会给被推迟献血者带来不愉快的感觉。在这项研究中,我们旨在探讨伊朗延期献血者与合格献血者的回归率对比情况。材料和方法这项研究包括 2017 年 3 月至 2018 年 3 月期间转诊的所有全血献血者,他们因任何原因经历了临时延期。在此期间成功献血的献血者也是研究的一部分。研究人员对参与者进行了随访,直到他们下一次尝试献血,时间跨度为首次纳入后的 4.8 年。结果在 993,824 名志愿者中,733,153 人(73.77%)符合献血条件,192,332 人(19.35%)暂时推迟献血。合格捐献者和延期捐献者的回归率分别为 74.77% 和 51.77%(OR:2.78;99%CI:2.71-2.81)。与首次捐献者、女性捐献者和年轻捐献者相比,延期定期捐献者(OR = 7.02,99%CI:6.64-7.42)、男性捐献者(OR:2.57,99%CI:2.45-2.69)和 45 岁以上捐献者(OR:1.15,99%CI:1.09-1.20)的返还几率更高。符合条件的捐献者和延期捐献者的返回时间中位数分别为 315 天(99%CI:313-316)和 1467 天(99%CI:1412-1524)。建议通过遵守选择捐献者的标准操作程序和有效的咨询来避免不必要的延期捐献,明确延期捐献的目的并鼓励他们在延期期结束后返回。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The return rate of deferred blood donors in Iran

Background and Objectives

The process of selecting blood donors is crucial for keeping the health of donors and ensuring the safety of the blood supply. However, it may create unpleasant feeling in those who are deferred. In this study, we aim to explore the return rates of Iranian deferred donors in comparison with eligible donors.

Materials and methods

The study included all whole blood donors referred between March 2017 and March 2018, who experienced temporary deferral for any reason. Donors who successfully donated blood during this period were also part of the study. Participants were followed up until their next donation attempt, spanning 4.8 years after initial inclusion. Then odds of return and median return time for both deferred and eligible donors were calculated.

Results

From 993,824 volunteers, 733,153 (73.77%) were eligible and 192,332 (19.35%) temporary deferred. The return rate in the eligible and deferred donors was 74.77% vs. 51.77%, respectively (OR:2.78; 99%CI: 2.71–2.81). Odds of return among deferred regular (OR = 7.02, 99%CI:6.64–7.42), men (OR: 2.57, 99%CI:2.45–2.69), and over 45 years (OR: 1.15, 99% CI: 1.09–1.20), was higher than first-time, women, and younger donors. The median return time for eligible and deferred donors was 315 (99%CI: 313–316) and 1,467(99%CI: 1,412–1,524) days, respectively.

Conclusion

This study revealed the negative effect of deferral on the return rate, that led to a 23% reduction in the return of deferred donors. Avoiding unnecessary deferral through adherence to the standard operating procedure of donor selection and effective counselling which clarifies the purpose of deferral and encourages them to return after the deferral period ends are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, the official journal of the French Society of Blood Transfusion (SFTS): - an aid to training, at a European level - the only French journal indexed in the hematology and immunology sections of Current Contents Transfusion Clinique et Biologique spans fundamental research and everyday practice, with articles coming from both sides. Articles, reviews, case reports, letters to the editor and editorials are published in 4 editions a year, in French or in English, covering all scientific and medical aspects of transfusion: immunology, hematology, infectious diseases, genetics, molecular biology, etc. And finally, a convivial cross-disciplinary section on training and information offers practical updates. Readership: "Transfusers" are many and various: anesthetists, biologists, hematologists, and blood-bank, ICU and mobile emergency specialists...
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Personalized autologous stem cell harvesting improves patient collection outcomes Icepack-Induced transient vasospasm leading to acrocyanosis in an Indian blood donor: A rare occurrence Paths to improve voluntary blood donation in mixed public/private blood donation systems such as in Lebanon?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1