"变革与民主的传递工具":探索数字参与中的关怀与规模

Benai Pham
{"title":"\"变革与民主的传递工具\":探索数字参与中的关怀与规模","authors":"Benai Pham","doi":"10.1016/j.diggeo.2024.100089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Special Issue defines ‘housing disruptors’ as the emerging ideologies, practices, and logics capable of changing the housing system. In this paper, I argue digital engagement technologies were a housing disruptor for combining an <em>ethic of care</em> and <em>technological scale</em> in order to reimagine planning democracy and ultimately the delivery of equitable housing. First, I outline the care ethics of digital engagement and connect it to a lineage of planning theory that values deliberative participation and agonistic urban politics. I then interrogate the meaning of scale in digital engagement and how it contributes to urban democracy and justice issues. However, the structural limitations that practitioners faced in practice put into question how possible it was to apply a scale logic from the technological and business world, which sought to streamline and grow, to a planning system (that is complex) and solutions to the housing crisis (even more complex). My concluding remarks suggest that digital engagement was symbolic for the changing value principles in planning, as one that was committed to a fairer and more equitable planning system; but how successful it was (or has been) able to provide an alternative planning structure remains uncertain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100377,"journal":{"name":"Digital Geography and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100089"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378324000114/pdfft?md5=d8bee0a2ecb09e0f08a66ef9a29a9b9d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666378324000114-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“A delivery vehicle for change and democracy”: Exploring care and scale in digital engagement\",\"authors\":\"Benai Pham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.diggeo.2024.100089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Special Issue defines ‘housing disruptors’ as the emerging ideologies, practices, and logics capable of changing the housing system. In this paper, I argue digital engagement technologies were a housing disruptor for combining an <em>ethic of care</em> and <em>technological scale</em> in order to reimagine planning democracy and ultimately the delivery of equitable housing. First, I outline the care ethics of digital engagement and connect it to a lineage of planning theory that values deliberative participation and agonistic urban politics. I then interrogate the meaning of scale in digital engagement and how it contributes to urban democracy and justice issues. However, the structural limitations that practitioners faced in practice put into question how possible it was to apply a scale logic from the technological and business world, which sought to streamline and grow, to a planning system (that is complex) and solutions to the housing crisis (even more complex). My concluding remarks suggest that digital engagement was symbolic for the changing value principles in planning, as one that was committed to a fairer and more equitable planning system; but how successful it was (or has been) able to provide an alternative planning structure remains uncertain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Geography and Society\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378324000114/pdfft?md5=d8bee0a2ecb09e0f08a66ef9a29a9b9d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666378324000114-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Geography and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378324000114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Geography and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378324000114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特刊将 "住房破坏者 "定义为能够改变住房系统的新兴意识形态、实践和逻辑。在本文中,我认为数字参与技术是一种住房颠覆者,它将关爱伦理与技术规模相结合,从而重新构想规划民主,并最终实现公平住房。首先,我概述了数字参与的关怀伦理,并将其与重视审议参与和激动式城市政治的规划理论相联系。然后,我探讨了数字参与中规模的意义,以及它如何促进城市民主和正义问题。然而,实践者在实践中面临的结构性限制让人质疑,将技术和商业世界的规模逻辑应用于规划系统(非常复杂)和住房危机解决方案(更加复杂)的可能性有多大。最后,我想说的是,数字参与对于规划价值原则的改变具有象征意义,因为它致力于建立一个更公平、更公正的规划系统;但它在提供另一种规划结构方面有多成功(或已经取得了多大的成功),目前仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“A delivery vehicle for change and democracy”: Exploring care and scale in digital engagement

The Special Issue defines ‘housing disruptors’ as the emerging ideologies, practices, and logics capable of changing the housing system. In this paper, I argue digital engagement technologies were a housing disruptor for combining an ethic of care and technological scale in order to reimagine planning democracy and ultimately the delivery of equitable housing. First, I outline the care ethics of digital engagement and connect it to a lineage of planning theory that values deliberative participation and agonistic urban politics. I then interrogate the meaning of scale in digital engagement and how it contributes to urban democracy and justice issues. However, the structural limitations that practitioners faced in practice put into question how possible it was to apply a scale logic from the technological and business world, which sought to streamline and grow, to a planning system (that is complex) and solutions to the housing crisis (even more complex). My concluding remarks suggest that digital engagement was symbolic for the changing value principles in planning, as one that was committed to a fairer and more equitable planning system; but how successful it was (or has been) able to provide an alternative planning structure remains uncertain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Broker bureaucracies: The subsidiary offices of the digitalizing state (Retail) platform legitimation through municipal partnerships? Characterizing climate change sentiments in Alaska on social media Counter-mapping platformization. Rethinking the spatial differentiation of platform control, labor relations and restaurant virtualization in proprietary markets for food-delivery Synthetic geospatial data and fake geography: A case study on the implications of AI-derived data in a data-intensive society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1