医疗服务提供者对多样性的接触导致腰椎和颈椎融合术结果的社会经济差异

Q1 Medicine World Neurosurgery: X Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100382
Gavin Touponse , Karen Malacon , Guan Li , Ezra Yoseph , Summer Han , Corinna Zygourakis
{"title":"医疗服务提供者对多样性的接触导致腰椎和颈椎融合术结果的社会经济差异","authors":"Gavin Touponse ,&nbsp;Karen Malacon ,&nbsp;Guan Li ,&nbsp;Ezra Yoseph ,&nbsp;Summer Han ,&nbsp;Corinna Zygourakis","doi":"10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies report patient race, income, and education influence spinal fusion outcomes; fewer studies, however, examine the influence of provider factors such as exposure to diversity or cultural sensitivity.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine how providers’ experience with diverse patient populations affects spinal fusion outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective review of 39,680 patients undergoing lumbar and cervical fusions, 2003–2021, in Clinformatics® Data Mart national database. We used the provider patient racial diversity index (pRDI)—a published metric of physician exposure to diverse patients—to divide patients into groups based their provider's category (I, II, III) where patients treated by category III providers had surgeons with the most diverse patient populations. Multivariate regression models on propensity score-matched cohorts examined the association between patient SES and provider category on post-operative outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Black patients had decreased discharge home (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54–0.83) compared to white patients. Patients treated by category III providers had increased length of stay (Coeff. 0.62; 95% CI 0.43–0.81), charge (Coeff. 36800; 95% CI 29,200–44,400), and decreased discharge home (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.83–0.97) compared to patients treated by category I providers. Asian patients treated by category II providers had decreased readmission (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14–0.96), and Black patients treated by category III providers had increased discharge home (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.1–1.9) compared to those treated by category I providers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While our study found two specific instances of improved spine surgery outcomes for minority patients treated by providers serving diverse patient populations, we present mixed findings overall. This study serves as the foundation for future research to better understand how provider pRDI affects outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37134,"journal":{"name":"World Neurosurgery: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724001133/pdfft?md5=6355aca110735b46bba9179b3ebd02c9&pid=1-s2.0-S2590139724001133-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provider's exposure to diversity contributes to socioeconomic disparities in lumbar and cervical fusion outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Gavin Touponse ,&nbsp;Karen Malacon ,&nbsp;Guan Li ,&nbsp;Ezra Yoseph ,&nbsp;Summer Han ,&nbsp;Corinna Zygourakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies report patient race, income, and education influence spinal fusion outcomes; fewer studies, however, examine the influence of provider factors such as exposure to diversity or cultural sensitivity.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine how providers’ experience with diverse patient populations affects spinal fusion outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective review of 39,680 patients undergoing lumbar and cervical fusions, 2003–2021, in Clinformatics® Data Mart national database. We used the provider patient racial diversity index (pRDI)—a published metric of physician exposure to diverse patients—to divide patients into groups based their provider's category (I, II, III) where patients treated by category III providers had surgeons with the most diverse patient populations. Multivariate regression models on propensity score-matched cohorts examined the association between patient SES and provider category on post-operative outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Black patients had decreased discharge home (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54–0.83) compared to white patients. Patients treated by category III providers had increased length of stay (Coeff. 0.62; 95% CI 0.43–0.81), charge (Coeff. 36800; 95% CI 29,200–44,400), and decreased discharge home (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.83–0.97) compared to patients treated by category I providers. Asian patients treated by category II providers had decreased readmission (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14–0.96), and Black patients treated by category III providers had increased discharge home (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.1–1.9) compared to those treated by category I providers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While our study found two specific instances of improved spine surgery outcomes for minority patients treated by providers serving diverse patient populations, we present mixed findings overall. This study serves as the foundation for future research to better understand how provider pRDI affects outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Neurosurgery: X\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724001133/pdfft?md5=6355aca110735b46bba9179b3ebd02c9&pid=1-s2.0-S2590139724001133-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Neurosurgery: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724001133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Neurosurgery: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724001133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景有研究报告称,患者的种族、收入和教育程度会影响脊柱融合术的治疗效果;但很少有研究探讨医疗服务提供者的因素(如接触多样性或文化敏感性)对脊柱融合术治疗效果的影响。我们使用医疗机构患者种族多样性指数 (pRDI)--一种已公布的医生接触多样化患者的指标--根据医疗机构的类别(I、II、III)将患者分为不同的组别,其中由 III 类医疗机构治疗的患者的外科医生拥有最多样化的患者群体。倾向得分匹配队列的多变量回归模型检验了患者社会经济地位和医疗服务提供者类别对术后结果的影响。与接受第一类医疗服务提供者治疗的患者相比,接受第三类医疗服务提供者治疗的患者的住院时间(Coeff.0.62;95% CI 0.43-0.81)、费用(Coeff.36800;95% CI 29200-44400)和出院回家时间(OR 0.90;95% CI 0.83-0.97)均有所增加。与接受一类医疗机构治疗的患者相比,接受二类医疗机构治疗的亚裔患者再入院率降低(OR 0.38;95% CI 0.14-0.96),接受三类医疗机构治疗的黑人患者出院回家率提高(OR 1.41;95% CI 1.1-1.9)。本研究为今后的研究奠定了基础,以便更好地了解医疗服务提供者的PRDI如何影响腰椎和颈椎手术患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Provider's exposure to diversity contributes to socioeconomic disparities in lumbar and cervical fusion outcomes

Background

Studies report patient race, income, and education influence spinal fusion outcomes; fewer studies, however, examine the influence of provider factors such as exposure to diversity or cultural sensitivity.

Objective

To examine how providers’ experience with diverse patient populations affects spinal fusion outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective review of 39,680 patients undergoing lumbar and cervical fusions, 2003–2021, in Clinformatics® Data Mart national database. We used the provider patient racial diversity index (pRDI)—a published metric of physician exposure to diverse patients—to divide patients into groups based their provider's category (I, II, III) where patients treated by category III providers had surgeons with the most diverse patient populations. Multivariate regression models on propensity score-matched cohorts examined the association between patient SES and provider category on post-operative outcomes.

Results

Black patients had decreased discharge home (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54–0.83) compared to white patients. Patients treated by category III providers had increased length of stay (Coeff. 0.62; 95% CI 0.43–0.81), charge (Coeff. 36800; 95% CI 29,200–44,400), and decreased discharge home (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.83–0.97) compared to patients treated by category I providers. Asian patients treated by category II providers had decreased readmission (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14–0.96), and Black patients treated by category III providers had increased discharge home (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.1–1.9) compared to those treated by category I providers.

Conclusion

While our study found two specific instances of improved spine surgery outcomes for minority patients treated by providers serving diverse patient populations, we present mixed findings overall. This study serves as the foundation for future research to better understand how provider pRDI affects outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Neurosurgery: X
World Neurosurgery: X Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
44 days
期刊最新文献
Comparative utility analysis of Chordoma search information between ChatGPT vs. Google Web Letter to the Editor regarding "Using the modified frailty index as a predictor of complications in adults undergoing transforaminal interbody lumbar fusion" Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for patients with 16 or more brain metastases: Retrospective single-institution analysis Trends in stroke-related mortality in California hospitals from 2010 to 2020: Have the large core stroke trials made a difference? Impact of body mass index on perioperative complications, radiographic outcomes, and pseudoarthrosis at one year after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1