国际贸易法如何通过生态标签约束推波助澜的行为?

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of World Trade Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.54648/trad2024020
Türkan Gülce Budak
{"title":"国际贸易法如何通过生态标签约束推波助澜的行为?","authors":"Türkan Gülce Budak","doi":"10.54648/trad2024020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay focuses on government-administered voluntary ecolabels, which could act as a nudge by altering consumer preferences toward labelled products. Consequently, they de facto compel producers to join the ecolabel schemes familiar to local consumers or dominant in the individual market to avoid being disadvantaged vis-à-vis domestic producers. Given this background, nudging with ecolabels needs to be analysed mainly with respect to the national treatment principle under international trade law. This principle regulates voluntary ecolabels under Articles D and E of the TBT Agreement Annex 3 and Article III:4 of the GATT 1994. These articles ensure that products from any World Trade Organization (WTO) member are treated no less favourable than ‘like products’ of national origin. However, the ‘like products’ definition is unclear under these clauses. Within the scope of this paper, ‘likeness’ is defined as products in a close competitive relationship. This determination can primarily be made from the consumers’ perspective. The essay hence focuses on the de facto discrimination between domestic and imported products due to ecolabels. Following this, it argues that such discrimination does not violate the national treatment principle because ecolabels also affect the ‘like’ product analysis by altering consumer preferences.\nEcolabelling, Voluntary Ecolabels, Informational Regulation, Nudge, Nudging, International Trade Law, National Treatment Principle, De facto Discrimination, Likeness Analysis, Consumer Preferences","PeriodicalId":46019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Trade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Can International Trade Law Discipline Nudging Through Ecolabels?\",\"authors\":\"Türkan Gülce Budak\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/trad2024020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay focuses on government-administered voluntary ecolabels, which could act as a nudge by altering consumer preferences toward labelled products. Consequently, they de facto compel producers to join the ecolabel schemes familiar to local consumers or dominant in the individual market to avoid being disadvantaged vis-à-vis domestic producers. Given this background, nudging with ecolabels needs to be analysed mainly with respect to the national treatment principle under international trade law. This principle regulates voluntary ecolabels under Articles D and E of the TBT Agreement Annex 3 and Article III:4 of the GATT 1994. These articles ensure that products from any World Trade Organization (WTO) member are treated no less favourable than ‘like products’ of national origin. However, the ‘like products’ definition is unclear under these clauses. Within the scope of this paper, ‘likeness’ is defined as products in a close competitive relationship. This determination can primarily be made from the consumers’ perspective. The essay hence focuses on the de facto discrimination between domestic and imported products due to ecolabels. Following this, it argues that such discrimination does not violate the national treatment principle because ecolabels also affect the ‘like’ product analysis by altering consumer preferences.\\nEcolabelling, Voluntary Ecolabels, Informational Regulation, Nudge, Nudging, International Trade Law, National Treatment Principle, De facto Discrimination, Likeness Analysis, Consumer Preferences\",\"PeriodicalId\":46019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Trade\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2024020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2024020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的重点是政府管理的自愿生态标签,它可以通过改变消费者对标签产品的偏好起到推动作用。因此,它们事实上迫使生产商加入当地消费者熟悉的生态标签计划或在个别市场上占主导地位的计划,以避免与国内生产商相比处于不利地位。在这种背景下,需要主要根据国际贸易法中的国民待遇原则来分析生态标签的推动作用。根据《技术性贸易壁垒协议》附件 3 第 D 和 E 条以及《1994 年关贸总协定》第 III:4 条,该原则对自愿生态标签进行了规范。这些条款确保任何世界贸易组织 (WTO) 成员国的产品都不会受到比原产于本国的 "同类产品 "更差的待遇。然而,在这些条款中,"同类产品 "的定义并不明确。在本文范围内,"同类产品 "被定义为具有密切竞争关系的产品。这种判断主要从消费者的角度出发。因此,本文的重点是生态标签造成的国内产品和进口产品之间事实上的歧视。生态标签、自愿性生态标签、信息监管、怂恿、怂恿、国际贸易法、国民待遇原则、事实上的歧视、相似性分析、消费者偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Can International Trade Law Discipline Nudging Through Ecolabels?
This essay focuses on government-administered voluntary ecolabels, which could act as a nudge by altering consumer preferences toward labelled products. Consequently, they de facto compel producers to join the ecolabel schemes familiar to local consumers or dominant in the individual market to avoid being disadvantaged vis-à-vis domestic producers. Given this background, nudging with ecolabels needs to be analysed mainly with respect to the national treatment principle under international trade law. This principle regulates voluntary ecolabels under Articles D and E of the TBT Agreement Annex 3 and Article III:4 of the GATT 1994. These articles ensure that products from any World Trade Organization (WTO) member are treated no less favourable than ‘like products’ of national origin. However, the ‘like products’ definition is unclear under these clauses. Within the scope of this paper, ‘likeness’ is defined as products in a close competitive relationship. This determination can primarily be made from the consumers’ perspective. The essay hence focuses on the de facto discrimination between domestic and imported products due to ecolabels. Following this, it argues that such discrimination does not violate the national treatment principle because ecolabels also affect the ‘like’ product analysis by altering consumer preferences. Ecolabelling, Voluntary Ecolabels, Informational Regulation, Nudge, Nudging, International Trade Law, National Treatment Principle, De facto Discrimination, Likeness Analysis, Consumer Preferences
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Far and away the most thought-provoking and informative journal in its field, the Journal of World Trade sets the agenda for both scholarship and policy initiatives in this most critical area of international relations. It is the only journal which deals authoritatively with the most crucial issues affecting world trade today.
期刊最新文献
The Recent Development On The Discipline Of Services Domestic Regulation And The Debate On The Necessity Test: From The Perspective Of The CPTPP, RCEP, And SDR Reference Paper Giving Meaning To Limitations How Can International Trade Law Discipline Nudging Through Ecolabels? Korea’s Trade Policy Beyond Free Trade Agreements Exogenous Shocks And The Dynamics Between Geopolitics And Global Trade
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1