人口统计学和社会经济健康决定因素可预测是否继续参与 CT 肺癌筛查计划。

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-04-21 DOI:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.04.004
{"title":"人口统计学和社会经济健康决定因素可预测是否继续参与 CT 肺癌筛查计划。","authors":"","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We developed machine learning (ML) models to assess demographic and socioeconomic status (SES) variables’ value in predicting continued participation in a low-dose CT lung cancer screening (LCS) program.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>480 LCS subjects were retrospectively examined for the following outcomes: (#1) no follow-up (single LCS scan) vs. multiple follow-ups (220 and 260 subjects respectively) and (#2) absent or delayed (&gt;1 month past the due date) follow-up vs timely follow-up (356 and 124 subjects respectively). We quantified the contributions of 14 socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical predictors to LCS adherence, and validated and compared prediction performances of multivariate logistic regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM) and shallow neural network (NN) models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For outcome #1, age, sex, race, insurance status, personal cancer history, and median household income were found to be associated with returning for follow-ups. For outcome #2, age, sex, race, and insurance status were significant predictor of absent/delayed LCS follow-up. Across 5-fold cross-validation, the MLR model achieved an average AUC of 0.732 (95% CI, 0.661-0.803) for outcome #1 and 0.633 (95% CI, 0.602-0.664) for outcome #2 and is the model with best predictive performance overall, whereas NN and SVM tended to overfit training data and fell short on testing data performance for either outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We identified significant predictors of LCS adherence, and our ML models can predict which subjects are at higher risk of receiving no or delayed LCS follow-ups. Our results could inform data-driven interventions to engage vulnerable populations and extend the benefits of LCS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51617,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"53 5","pages":"Pages 552-559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036301882400077X/pdfft?md5=048cc707df6a7db501d32b80070ddcee&pid=1-s2.0-S036301882400077X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demographics and socioeconomic determinants of health predict continued participation in a CT lung cancer screening program\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We developed machine learning (ML) models to assess demographic and socioeconomic status (SES) variables’ value in predicting continued participation in a low-dose CT lung cancer screening (LCS) program.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>480 LCS subjects were retrospectively examined for the following outcomes: (#1) no follow-up (single LCS scan) vs. multiple follow-ups (220 and 260 subjects respectively) and (#2) absent or delayed (&gt;1 month past the due date) follow-up vs timely follow-up (356 and 124 subjects respectively). We quantified the contributions of 14 socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical predictors to LCS adherence, and validated and compared prediction performances of multivariate logistic regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM) and shallow neural network (NN) models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For outcome #1, age, sex, race, insurance status, personal cancer history, and median household income were found to be associated with returning for follow-ups. For outcome #2, age, sex, race, and insurance status were significant predictor of absent/delayed LCS follow-up. Across 5-fold cross-validation, the MLR model achieved an average AUC of 0.732 (95% CI, 0.661-0.803) for outcome #1 and 0.633 (95% CI, 0.602-0.664) for outcome #2 and is the model with best predictive performance overall, whereas NN and SVM tended to overfit training data and fell short on testing data performance for either outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We identified significant predictors of LCS adherence, and our ML models can predict which subjects are at higher risk of receiving no or delayed LCS follow-ups. Our results could inform data-driven interventions to engage vulnerable populations and extend the benefits of LCS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"53 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 552-559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036301882400077X/pdfft?md5=048cc707df6a7db501d32b80070ddcee&pid=1-s2.0-S036301882400077X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036301882400077X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036301882400077X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料与方法 我们对 480 名肺癌筛查受试者进行了回顾性研究,结果如下:(#1) 无随访(单次肺癌扫描)与多次随访(分别为 220 名和 260 名受试者);(#2) 缺席或延迟(超过到期日 1 个月)随访与及时随访(分别为 356 名和 124 名受试者)。我们量化了 14 个社会经济、人口统计学和临床预测因素对坚持 LCS 的贡献,并验证和比较了多元逻辑回归 (MLR)、支持向量机 (SVM) 和浅层神经网络 (NN) 模型的预测性能。结果对于结果 #1,我们发现年龄、性别、种族、保险状况、个人癌症病史和家庭收入中位数与返回随访相关。对于结果 2,年龄、性别、种族和保险状况是缺席/延迟 LCS 随访的重要预测因素。在 5 倍交叉验证中,MLR 模型对结果 #1 的平均 AUC 为 0.732(95% CI,0.661-0.803),对结果 #2 的平均 AUC 为 0.633(95% CI,0.602-0.664),是整体预测性能最好的模型,而 NN 和 SVM 则倾向于过拟合训练数据,对任何一个结果的测试数据性能都不理想。结论我们发现了LCS依从性的重要预测因素,我们的ML模型可以预测哪些受试者不接受或延迟接受LCS随访的风险较高。我们的研究结果可以为数据驱动的干预措施提供信息,以吸引弱势群体参与并扩大 LCS 的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Demographics and socioeconomic determinants of health predict continued participation in a CT lung cancer screening program

Purpose

We developed machine learning (ML) models to assess demographic and socioeconomic status (SES) variables’ value in predicting continued participation in a low-dose CT lung cancer screening (LCS) program.

Materials and Methods

480 LCS subjects were retrospectively examined for the following outcomes: (#1) no follow-up (single LCS scan) vs. multiple follow-ups (220 and 260 subjects respectively) and (#2) absent or delayed (>1 month past the due date) follow-up vs timely follow-up (356 and 124 subjects respectively). We quantified the contributions of 14 socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical predictors to LCS adherence, and validated and compared prediction performances of multivariate logistic regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM) and shallow neural network (NN) models.

Results

For outcome #1, age, sex, race, insurance status, personal cancer history, and median household income were found to be associated with returning for follow-ups. For outcome #2, age, sex, race, and insurance status were significant predictor of absent/delayed LCS follow-up. Across 5-fold cross-validation, the MLR model achieved an average AUC of 0.732 (95% CI, 0.661-0.803) for outcome #1 and 0.633 (95% CI, 0.602-0.664) for outcome #2 and is the model with best predictive performance overall, whereas NN and SVM tended to overfit training data and fell short on testing data performance for either outcome.

Conclusions

We identified significant predictors of LCS adherence, and our ML models can predict which subjects are at higher risk of receiving no or delayed LCS follow-ups. Our results could inform data-driven interventions to engage vulnerable populations and extend the benefits of LCS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology covers important and controversial topics in radiology. Each issue presents important viewpoints from leading radiologists. High-quality reproductions of radiographs, CT scans, MR images, and sonograms clearly depict what is being described in each article. Also included are valuable updates relevant to other areas of practice, such as medical-legal issues or archiving systems. With new multi-topic format and image-intensive style, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology offers an outstanding, time-saving investigation into current topics most relevant to radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Corrigendum to “Original Article: The history of Women in Radiology (WIR) programs at two academic institutions: How we did it and how we merged best practices” [Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology 54 (2025) 35-39] A stroke imaging protocol in patients with a history of contrast-induced anaphylaxis Arachnoid granulations: Dynamic nature and review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1