脑深部刺激和经颅磁刺激在中风神经恢复中的应用:综述

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurorestoratology Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jnrt.2024.100120
Yanxi Chen , Zhidong Xu , Tingting Liu , Dan Li , Xin Tian , Ruifang Zheng , Yifu Ma , Songyang Zheng , Jianguo Xing , Wen Wang , Fangling Sun
{"title":"脑深部刺激和经颅磁刺激在中风神经恢复中的应用:综述","authors":"Yanxi Chen ,&nbsp;Zhidong Xu ,&nbsp;Tingting Liu ,&nbsp;Dan Li ,&nbsp;Xin Tian ,&nbsp;Ruifang Zheng ,&nbsp;Yifu Ma ,&nbsp;Songyang Zheng ,&nbsp;Jianguo Xing ,&nbsp;Wen Wang ,&nbsp;Fangling Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jnrt.2024.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stroke is a global cause of death and neurological disability. Survivors of stroke experience impaired quality of life because of post-stroke motor disorders, which are the primary driver of stroke-associated healthcare expenditures. Neuromodulatory techniques offer a promising avenue for addressing these post-stroke motor disorders. Post-stroke motor disorders are thought to be related to ongoing maladaptive responses and abnormal brain network reorganization; this offers insights into the inadequacy of most current treatments. In the present review, we summarize the following models involved in post-stroke motor disorders: the dual-pathway model of the basal ganglia, the cerebrocerebellar model, and the interhemispheric inhibition model. By identifying these critical elements, it will be clinically possible to explore mechanism-based therapeutics. On the basis of this physiological understanding, we review progress in the clinical application of the main therapeutic modalities; namely, invasive deep brain stimulation (DBS) and noninvasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), both of which are currently under investigation for neuromodulation in stroke. Both DBS and TMS are approved by the Food and Drug Administration because of their safety and efficacy. Although little is known about their underlying molecular mechanisms, recent studies have indicated that DBS and TMS promote post-stroke neurogenesis and neuroplasticity, suggesting potential pathways for restoring post-stroke motor disorders. Moreover, we focus specifically on the interactions between TMS and DBS, and discuss the ways in which combined DBS and TMS—for the future personalization of treatment strategies—will further ameliorate post-stroke motor disorders. For example, TMS can be used safely in movement disorder patients with DBS, and pairing DBS with TMS at specific intervals and patterns produces long-term potentiation-like effects related to cortical plasticity. A further characterization of the precise repair mechanisms, together with technological innovations, is likely to substantially improve the efficacy of treatments for post-stroke motor disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44709,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurorestoratology","volume":"12 2","pages":"Article 100120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2324242624000275/pdfft?md5=742c26112a52e9ef11c8e0b56ca5d279&pid=1-s2.0-S2324242624000275-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke neurorestoration: A review\",\"authors\":\"Yanxi Chen ,&nbsp;Zhidong Xu ,&nbsp;Tingting Liu ,&nbsp;Dan Li ,&nbsp;Xin Tian ,&nbsp;Ruifang Zheng ,&nbsp;Yifu Ma ,&nbsp;Songyang Zheng ,&nbsp;Jianguo Xing ,&nbsp;Wen Wang ,&nbsp;Fangling Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnrt.2024.100120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Stroke is a global cause of death and neurological disability. Survivors of stroke experience impaired quality of life because of post-stroke motor disorders, which are the primary driver of stroke-associated healthcare expenditures. Neuromodulatory techniques offer a promising avenue for addressing these post-stroke motor disorders. Post-stroke motor disorders are thought to be related to ongoing maladaptive responses and abnormal brain network reorganization; this offers insights into the inadequacy of most current treatments. In the present review, we summarize the following models involved in post-stroke motor disorders: the dual-pathway model of the basal ganglia, the cerebrocerebellar model, and the interhemispheric inhibition model. By identifying these critical elements, it will be clinically possible to explore mechanism-based therapeutics. On the basis of this physiological understanding, we review progress in the clinical application of the main therapeutic modalities; namely, invasive deep brain stimulation (DBS) and noninvasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), both of which are currently under investigation for neuromodulation in stroke. Both DBS and TMS are approved by the Food and Drug Administration because of their safety and efficacy. Although little is known about their underlying molecular mechanisms, recent studies have indicated that DBS and TMS promote post-stroke neurogenesis and neuroplasticity, suggesting potential pathways for restoring post-stroke motor disorders. Moreover, we focus specifically on the interactions between TMS and DBS, and discuss the ways in which combined DBS and TMS—for the future personalization of treatment strategies—will further ameliorate post-stroke motor disorders. For example, TMS can be used safely in movement disorder patients with DBS, and pairing DBS with TMS at specific intervals and patterns produces long-term potentiation-like effects related to cortical plasticity. A further characterization of the precise repair mechanisms, together with technological innovations, is likely to substantially improve the efficacy of treatments for post-stroke motor disorders.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurorestoratology\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2324242624000275/pdfft?md5=742c26112a52e9ef11c8e0b56ca5d279&pid=1-s2.0-S2324242624000275-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurorestoratology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2324242624000275\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurorestoratology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2324242624000275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中风是导致死亡和神经残疾的全球性疾病。由于中风后运动障碍,中风幸存者的生活质量受到影响,而运动障碍是中风相关医疗支出的主要驱动因素。神经调节技术为解决这些中风后运动障碍提供了一条前景广阔的途径。卒中后运动障碍被认为与持续的不适应反应和异常的脑网络重组有关;这为目前大多数治疗方法的不足提供了启示。在本综述中,我们总结了与中风后运动障碍有关的以下模型:基底节双通路模型、小脑模型和半球间抑制模型。通过确定这些关键因素,将有可能在临床上探索基于机制的治疗方法。在此生理学认识的基础上,我们回顾了主要治疗方式的临床应用进展,即有创脑深部刺激(DBS)和无创经颅磁刺激(TMS),这两种方式目前都在研究用于中风的神经调控。由于其安全性和有效性,DBS 和 TMS 均获得了美国食品药品管理局的批准。虽然人们对它们的分子机制知之甚少,但最近的研究表明,DBS 和 TMS 可促进中风后的神经发生和神经可塑性,为恢复中风后的运动障碍提供了潜在的途径。此外,我们还特别关注了 TMS 和 DBS 之间的相互作用,并讨论了如何将 DBS 和 TMS 结合起来,以便在未来采取个性化的治疗策略,进一步改善卒中后运动障碍。例如,TMS可以安全地用于运动障碍患者的DBS治疗,在特定的时间间隔和模式下将DBS与TMS配对会产生与皮质可塑性相关的长期电位效应。对精确修复机制的进一步研究以及技术创新很可能会大大提高中风后运动障碍的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke neurorestoration: A review

Stroke is a global cause of death and neurological disability. Survivors of stroke experience impaired quality of life because of post-stroke motor disorders, which are the primary driver of stroke-associated healthcare expenditures. Neuromodulatory techniques offer a promising avenue for addressing these post-stroke motor disorders. Post-stroke motor disorders are thought to be related to ongoing maladaptive responses and abnormal brain network reorganization; this offers insights into the inadequacy of most current treatments. In the present review, we summarize the following models involved in post-stroke motor disorders: the dual-pathway model of the basal ganglia, the cerebrocerebellar model, and the interhemispheric inhibition model. By identifying these critical elements, it will be clinically possible to explore mechanism-based therapeutics. On the basis of this physiological understanding, we review progress in the clinical application of the main therapeutic modalities; namely, invasive deep brain stimulation (DBS) and noninvasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), both of which are currently under investigation for neuromodulation in stroke. Both DBS and TMS are approved by the Food and Drug Administration because of their safety and efficacy. Although little is known about their underlying molecular mechanisms, recent studies have indicated that DBS and TMS promote post-stroke neurogenesis and neuroplasticity, suggesting potential pathways for restoring post-stroke motor disorders. Moreover, we focus specifically on the interactions between TMS and DBS, and discuss the ways in which combined DBS and TMS—for the future personalization of treatment strategies—will further ameliorate post-stroke motor disorders. For example, TMS can be used safely in movement disorder patients with DBS, and pairing DBS with TMS at specific intervals and patterns produces long-term potentiation-like effects related to cortical plasticity. A further characterization of the precise repair mechanisms, together with technological innovations, is likely to substantially improve the efficacy of treatments for post-stroke motor disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurorestoratology
Journal of Neurorestoratology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Authors’ response to correspondence regarding “Application of deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke neurorestoration: A review” Response to the Letter from Dr. Li et al. for “Two Sides of One Coin: Neurorestoratology and Neurorehabilitation” Letter to Editor: Correspondence to "Two sides of one coin: Neurorestoratology and Neurorehabilitation" Corrigendum to “Comparison of chronic restraint stress-and lipopolysaccharide-induced mouse models of depression: Behavior, c-Fos expression, and microglial and astrocytic activation” [J Neurorestoratol 12 (2024) 100130] Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1