{"title":"关于植入式心脏除颤器治疗有症状的儿茶酚胺能多形性室性心动过速患儿的国际多中心队列研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) may cause </span>sudden cardiac death (SCD) despite medical therapy. Therefore, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are commonly advised. However, there is limited data on the outcomes of ICD use in children.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of arrhythmic events in pediatric patients with CPVT with and without an ICD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We compared the risk of SCD in patients with <em>RYR2</em><span> (ryanodine receptor 2) variants and phenotype-positive symptomatic CPVT patients with and without an ICD who were younger than 19 years and had no history of sudden cardiac arrest at phenotype diagnosis. The primary outcome was SCD; secondary outcomes were composite end points of SCD, sudden cardiac arrest, or appropriate ICD shocks with or without arrhythmic syncope.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 235 patients, 73 with an ICD (31.1%) and 162 without an ICD (68.9%). Over a median follow-up of 8.0 years (interquartile range 4.3–13.4 years), SCD occurred in 7 patients (3.0%), of whom 4 (57.1%) were noncompliant with medications and none had an ICD. Patients with ICD had a higher risk of both secondary composite outcomes (without syncope: hazard ratio 5.85; 95% confidence interval 3.40–10.09; <em>P</em> < .0001; with syncope: hazard ratio 2.55; 95% confidence interval 1.50–4.34; <em>P</em> = .0005). Thirty-one patients with ICD (42.5%) experienced appropriate shocks, 18 (24.7%) inappropriate shocks, and 21 (28.8%) device-related complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SCD events occurred only in patients without an ICD and mostly in those not on optimal medical therapy. Patients with an ICD had a high risk of appropriate and inappropriate shocks, which may be reduced with appropriate device programming. Severe ICD complications were common, and risks vs benefits of ICDs need to be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"21 10","pages":"Pages 1767-1776"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An international multicenter cohort study on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for the treatment of symptomatic children with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) may cause </span>sudden cardiac death (SCD) despite medical therapy. Therefore, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are commonly advised. However, there is limited data on the outcomes of ICD use in children.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of arrhythmic events in pediatric patients with CPVT with and without an ICD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We compared the risk of SCD in patients with <em>RYR2</em><span> (ryanodine receptor 2) variants and phenotype-positive symptomatic CPVT patients with and without an ICD who were younger than 19 years and had no history of sudden cardiac arrest at phenotype diagnosis. The primary outcome was SCD; secondary outcomes were composite end points of SCD, sudden cardiac arrest, or appropriate ICD shocks with or without arrhythmic syncope.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 235 patients, 73 with an ICD (31.1%) and 162 without an ICD (68.9%). Over a median follow-up of 8.0 years (interquartile range 4.3–13.4 years), SCD occurred in 7 patients (3.0%), of whom 4 (57.1%) were noncompliant with medications and none had an ICD. Patients with ICD had a higher risk of both secondary composite outcomes (without syncope: hazard ratio 5.85; 95% confidence interval 3.40–10.09; <em>P</em> < .0001; with syncope: hazard ratio 2.55; 95% confidence interval 1.50–4.34; <em>P</em> = .0005). Thirty-one patients with ICD (42.5%) experienced appropriate shocks, 18 (24.7%) inappropriate shocks, and 21 (28.8%) device-related complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SCD events occurred only in patients without an ICD and mostly in those not on optimal medical therapy. Patients with an ICD had a high risk of appropriate and inappropriate shocks, which may be reduced with appropriate device programming. Severe ICD complications were common, and risks vs benefits of ICDs need to be considered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"volume\":\"21 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1767-1776\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527124023233\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527124023233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
An international multicenter cohort study on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for the treatment of symptomatic children with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
Background
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) may cause sudden cardiac death (SCD) despite medical therapy. Therefore, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are commonly advised. However, there is limited data on the outcomes of ICD use in children.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of arrhythmic events in pediatric patients with CPVT with and without an ICD.
Methods
We compared the risk of SCD in patients with RYR2 (ryanodine receptor 2) variants and phenotype-positive symptomatic CPVT patients with and without an ICD who were younger than 19 years and had no history of sudden cardiac arrest at phenotype diagnosis. The primary outcome was SCD; secondary outcomes were composite end points of SCD, sudden cardiac arrest, or appropriate ICD shocks with or without arrhythmic syncope.
Results
The study included 235 patients, 73 with an ICD (31.1%) and 162 without an ICD (68.9%). Over a median follow-up of 8.0 years (interquartile range 4.3–13.4 years), SCD occurred in 7 patients (3.0%), of whom 4 (57.1%) were noncompliant with medications and none had an ICD. Patients with ICD had a higher risk of both secondary composite outcomes (without syncope: hazard ratio 5.85; 95% confidence interval 3.40–10.09; P < .0001; with syncope: hazard ratio 2.55; 95% confidence interval 1.50–4.34; P = .0005). Thirty-one patients with ICD (42.5%) experienced appropriate shocks, 18 (24.7%) inappropriate shocks, and 21 (28.8%) device-related complications.
Conclusion
SCD events occurred only in patients without an ICD and mostly in those not on optimal medical therapy. Patients with an ICD had a high risk of appropriate and inappropriate shocks, which may be reduced with appropriate device programming. Severe ICD complications were common, and risks vs benefits of ICDs need to be considered.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.