{"title":"在多参数磁共振成像显示为 PI-RADS 1-2 的未接受过活检的男性中,采用经会阴模板引导的映射前列腺活检术的实用性","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyze the outcomes of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy (TTMB) in biopsy-naïve men with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) results of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 1-2.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed TTMB outcomes in biopsy naïve patients with PI-RADS 1-2 at a single center from August 2018 to May 2023. The patients' clinicopathologic data were reviewed, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates were identified. We determined significant predictive factors and determined those optimal cutoff point using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>255 biopsy naïve patients with PI-RADS 1-2 underwent TTMB. 72 (28.2%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 30 (11.8%) were diagnosed with csPCa. ROC curves were used to identify predictive factors for diagnosing csPCa. Age (area under ROC curve [AUC]: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65–0.83, <em>P</em> < 0.001) and prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) (AUC: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.53–0.72, <em>P</em> = 0.025) were significant predictive factors, and the optimal cutoff points determined using the Youden index were 65 years and 0.15 ng/mL/mL, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Of biopsy-naïve patients classified as PI-RADS 1–2, 11.8% were diagnosed with csPCa, and we identified age and PSAD as significant predictive factors. Our study will help determine the biopsy method for patients with PI-RADS 1–2 without biopsy experience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 134-138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888224000278/pdfft?md5=c3656b950e9849c93702a42d05f47111&pid=1-s2.0-S2287888224000278-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADS 1-2 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyze the outcomes of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy (TTMB) in biopsy-naïve men with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) results of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 1-2.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed TTMB outcomes in biopsy naïve patients with PI-RADS 1-2 at a single center from August 2018 to May 2023. The patients' clinicopathologic data were reviewed, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates were identified. We determined significant predictive factors and determined those optimal cutoff point using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>255 biopsy naïve patients with PI-RADS 1-2 underwent TTMB. 72 (28.2%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 30 (11.8%) were diagnosed with csPCa. ROC curves were used to identify predictive factors for diagnosing csPCa. Age (area under ROC curve [AUC]: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65–0.83, <em>P</em> < 0.001) and prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) (AUC: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.53–0.72, <em>P</em> = 0.025) were significant predictive factors, and the optimal cutoff points determined using the Youden index were 65 years and 0.15 ng/mL/mL, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Of biopsy-naïve patients classified as PI-RADS 1–2, 11.8% were diagnosed with csPCa, and we identified age and PSAD as significant predictive factors. Our study will help determine the biopsy method for patients with PI-RADS 1–2 without biopsy experience.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate International\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 134-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888224000278/pdfft?md5=c3656b950e9849c93702a42d05f47111&pid=1-s2.0-S2287888224000278-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888224000278\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888224000278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utility of transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADS 1-2 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
Objective
To analyze the outcomes of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy (TTMB) in biopsy-naïve men with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) results of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 1-2.
Patients and methods
We retrospectively reviewed TTMB outcomes in biopsy naïve patients with PI-RADS 1-2 at a single center from August 2018 to May 2023. The patients' clinicopathologic data were reviewed, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates were identified. We determined significant predictive factors and determined those optimal cutoff point using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results
255 biopsy naïve patients with PI-RADS 1-2 underwent TTMB. 72 (28.2%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 30 (11.8%) were diagnosed with csPCa. ROC curves were used to identify predictive factors for diagnosing csPCa. Age (area under ROC curve [AUC]: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65–0.83, P < 0.001) and prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) (AUC: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.53–0.72, P = 0.025) were significant predictive factors, and the optimal cutoff points determined using the Youden index were 65 years and 0.15 ng/mL/mL, respectively.
Conclusion
Of biopsy-naïve patients classified as PI-RADS 1–2, 11.8% were diagnosed with csPCa, and we identified age and PSAD as significant predictive factors. Our study will help determine the biopsy method for patients with PI-RADS 1–2 without biopsy experience.
期刊介绍:
Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...