Impact of Midfoot Charcot Arthropathy (Brodsky Type 1) on Patient Reported Outcome Scores

Introduction/Purpose: Charcot arthropathy is a debilitating and challenging clinical problem for patients and providers. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an effective tool for gauging a patient’s quality of life and daily functioning, but they have not been reported in the setting of Charcot arthropathy. Our goal is to assess PROMs severity in midfoot Charcot arthropathy (Brodsky Type 1), alongside linked demographics and comorbidities. We will compare these values with PROMs from conditions like ESRD, knee and hip arthritis, highlighting Charcot arthropathy's comparable debilitation. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified 67 patients with Brodsky Type 1 Charcot arthropathy by one of two fellowship- trained foot and ankle surgeons at a single academic medical center between years 2015 and 2023. ICD-10 CM codes E11.610, M14.671, and M14.672 were used to identify diagnosis of Charcot arthropathy and radiological interpretation determined Brodsky type. Data collected from patient charts included demographics, medical history, presence of ulcers, and preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain Disability Index (PDI), SSS- 8, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores and postoperative FAOS and FAAM scores. A One-Way ANOVA was performed to evaluate statistical significance. Averages of preoperative PROM scores were compared to literature values for other diseases. Results: Our cohort was mostly male (58.2%), with mean age 61.73 years, BMI 32.9, and A1C 6.9. Initial presentation revealed 50.7% had ulcers. Brodsky type 1 (midfoot) had notably the lowest pre-op PROM scores when compared to other Brodsky types: PDI Recreation (p=.033), FAOS Symptoms and Stiffness (p=.044), and FAOS Recreation (p=.027). Ulcer presence yielded significantly lower FAAM-ADL scores (p=.038), while other PROMs showed no statistical difference. Our mean VAS score was 53.34 which was higher than hip arthritis VAS (43.0) but lower than ESRD VAS (60.0) and knee arthritis VAS (64.2). Our SF-12 PCS scores (29.4) exceeded prior reports (hip 28.5, knee 28.6), while SF-12 MCS scores were higher in earlier studies (hip 49.6, knee 51.5) than our 43.8. Conclusion: Patients with Charcot arthropathy struggle in daily tasks, reflected in lowered FAOS ADL scores. Brodsky type 1 patients also face challenges in higher-level activities, evident in reduced PDI recreation and FAOS recreation scores. Those with ulcers similarly encounter issues in daily tasks, seen in lower FAAM ADL scores. Brodsky type 1 patients also experience debilitating pain as noted by higher VAS scores when compared to known debilitating conditions such as hip and knee arthritis. Comparatively minor differences in knee and hip arthritis SF-12 PCS scores indicate significant physical limitations for these patients.