妊娠体重增长图表是否应排除产后体重过重的人?

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1111/jhn.13310
Peter M. Socha, Kari Johansson, Lisa M. Bodnar, Jennifer A. Hutcheon
{"title":"妊娠体重增长图表是否应排除产后体重过重的人?","authors":"Peter M. Socha,&nbsp;Kari Johansson,&nbsp;Lisa M. Bodnar,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Hutcheon","doi":"10.1111/jhn.13310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>High gestational weight gain is associated with excess postpartum weight retention, yet excess postpartum weight retention is not an exclusion criterion for current gestational weight gain charts. We aimed to assess the impact of excluding individuals with high interpregnancy weight change (a proxy for excess postpartum weight retention) on gestational weight gain distributions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We included individuals with an index birth from 2008 to 2014 and a subsequent birth before 2019, in the population-based Stockholm-Gotland Perinatal Cohort. We estimated gestational weight gain (kg) at 25 and 37 weeks, using weight at first prenatal visit (&lt;14 weeks) as the reference. We calculated high interpregnancy weight change (≥10 kg and ≥5 kg) using the difference between weight at the start of an index and subsequent pregnancy. We compared gestational weight gain distributions and percentiles (stratified by early-pregnancy body mass index) before and after excluding participants with high interpregnancy weight change.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 55,723 participants, 17% had ≥10 kg and 34% had ≥5 kg interpregnancy weight change. The third, tenth, 50th, 90th and 97th percentiles of gestational weight gain were similar (largely within 1 kg) before versus after excluding participants with high interpregnancy weight change, at both 25 and 37 weeks. For example, among normal weight participants at 37 weeks, the 50th and 97th percentiles were 14 kg and 23 kg including versus 13 kg and 23 kg excluding participants with ≥5 kg interpregnancy weight change.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Excluding individuals with excess postpartum weight retention from normative gestational weight gain charts may not meaningfully impact the charts' percentiles.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"37 4","pages":"892-898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jhn.13310","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should gestational weight gain charts exclude individuals with excess postpartum weight retention?\",\"authors\":\"Peter M. Socha,&nbsp;Kari Johansson,&nbsp;Lisa M. Bodnar,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Hutcheon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jhn.13310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>High gestational weight gain is associated with excess postpartum weight retention, yet excess postpartum weight retention is not an exclusion criterion for current gestational weight gain charts. We aimed to assess the impact of excluding individuals with high interpregnancy weight change (a proxy for excess postpartum weight retention) on gestational weight gain distributions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included individuals with an index birth from 2008 to 2014 and a subsequent birth before 2019, in the population-based Stockholm-Gotland Perinatal Cohort. We estimated gestational weight gain (kg) at 25 and 37 weeks, using weight at first prenatal visit (&lt;14 weeks) as the reference. We calculated high interpregnancy weight change (≥10 kg and ≥5 kg) using the difference between weight at the start of an index and subsequent pregnancy. We compared gestational weight gain distributions and percentiles (stratified by early-pregnancy body mass index) before and after excluding participants with high interpregnancy weight change.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among 55,723 participants, 17% had ≥10 kg and 34% had ≥5 kg interpregnancy weight change. The third, tenth, 50th, 90th and 97th percentiles of gestational weight gain were similar (largely within 1 kg) before versus after excluding participants with high interpregnancy weight change, at both 25 and 37 weeks. For example, among normal weight participants at 37 weeks, the 50th and 97th percentiles were 14 kg and 23 kg including versus 13 kg and 23 kg excluding participants with ≥5 kg interpregnancy weight change.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Excluding individuals with excess postpartum weight retention from normative gestational weight gain charts may not meaningfully impact the charts' percentiles.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"892-898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jhn.13310\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.13310\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.13310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景妊娠期体重增长过快与产后体重过多有关,但产后体重过多并不是目前妊娠期体重增长图表的排除标准。我们的目的是评估排除妊娠期体重变化大(代表产后体重过多滞留)的个体对妊娠体重增加分布的影响。方法我们纳入了斯德哥尔摩-哥特兰围产队列中以人口为基础的 2008 年至 2014 年期间指数分娩和 2019 年之前后续分娩的个体。我们以首次产前检查(14 周)时的体重为参考,估算了 25 周和 37 周时的妊娠体重增加(千克)。我们以指数妊娠开始时的体重与随后妊娠开始时的体重之差计算高孕期体重变化(≥10 千克和≥5 千克)。我们比较了排除高孕期体重变化参与者前后的妊娠体重增加分布和百分位数(按孕早期体重指数分层)。在剔除孕周间体重变化大的参试者之前和之后,25 周和 37 周孕周体重增加的第三、第十、第五十、第九十和第九十七百分位数相似(基本在 1 千克以内)。例如,在 37 周时体重正常的参与者中,第 50 百分位数和第 97 百分位数分别为 14 千克和 23 千克,而排除孕期体重变化≥5 千克的参与者后,第 50 百分位数和第 97 百分位数分别为 13 千克和 23 千克。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Should gestational weight gain charts exclude individuals with excess postpartum weight retention?

Background

High gestational weight gain is associated with excess postpartum weight retention, yet excess postpartum weight retention is not an exclusion criterion for current gestational weight gain charts. We aimed to assess the impact of excluding individuals with high interpregnancy weight change (a proxy for excess postpartum weight retention) on gestational weight gain distributions.

Methods

We included individuals with an index birth from 2008 to 2014 and a subsequent birth before 2019, in the population-based Stockholm-Gotland Perinatal Cohort. We estimated gestational weight gain (kg) at 25 and 37 weeks, using weight at first prenatal visit (<14 weeks) as the reference. We calculated high interpregnancy weight change (≥10 kg and ≥5 kg) using the difference between weight at the start of an index and subsequent pregnancy. We compared gestational weight gain distributions and percentiles (stratified by early-pregnancy body mass index) before and after excluding participants with high interpregnancy weight change.

Results

Among 55,723 participants, 17% had ≥10 kg and 34% had ≥5 kg interpregnancy weight change. The third, tenth, 50th, 90th and 97th percentiles of gestational weight gain were similar (largely within 1 kg) before versus after excluding participants with high interpregnancy weight change, at both 25 and 37 weeks. For example, among normal weight participants at 37 weeks, the 50th and 97th percentiles were 14 kg and 23 kg including versus 13 kg and 23 kg excluding participants with ≥5 kg interpregnancy weight change.

Conclusions

Excluding individuals with excess postpartum weight retention from normative gestational weight gain charts may not meaningfully impact the charts' percentiles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
期刊最新文献
Consolidating the evidence on the effectiveness of strategies to promote vegetable intake in priority settings: An overview of systematic reviews. Dietary counselling to increase soluble fibre in patients with gynaecological cancers undergoing pelvic radiotherapy: A feasibility study. Dietitians' perspectives on key components relevant for successful dietetic treatment of adults with obesity in primary health care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands. HEAL-D Online: Exploring the potential for the spread and adoption of a virtual culturally tailored diabetes self-management programme for adults of African and Caribbean heritage. Information sharing and seeking about nutrition-related complementary and alternative medicines in online forums for people affected by cancer: A content analysis of discussion threads.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1