认知科学的计算:模拟与数字

Corey J. Maley
{"title":"认知科学的计算:模拟与数字","authors":"Corey J. Maley","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive science was founded on the idea that the mind/brain can be understood in computational terms. While computational <jats:italic>modeling</jats:italic> in science is ubiquitous, cognitive science takes the stronger stance that the mind/brain literally performs computations. Moreover, performing computations is crucial to explaining what the mind/brain does, qua mind/brain. Unfortunately, most scientists fail to consider analog computation as a legitimate and theoretically useful type of computation in addition to digital computation; to the extent that analog computation <jats:italic>is</jats:italic> acknowledged, it is mostly based on a simplistic and incomplete understanding. Taking computation to consist of only one type (i.e., digital) while ignoring another, interestingly distinct type (i.e., analog) leads to an impoverished understanding of what it could mean for minds/brains to compute. A full appreciation and understanding of analog computation—particularly in relation to digital computation—allows researchers to develop computational frameworks and hypotheses in new and exciting ways. Thus, somewhat counterintuitively, looking to the once‐dominant computing paradigm of yesteryear can provide novel computational ways of thinking about the mind and brain.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item>Philosophy &gt; Foundations of Cognitive Science</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":501132,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Cognitive Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computation for cognitive science: Analog versus digital\",\"authors\":\"Corey J. Maley\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wcs.1679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cognitive science was founded on the idea that the mind/brain can be understood in computational terms. While computational <jats:italic>modeling</jats:italic> in science is ubiquitous, cognitive science takes the stronger stance that the mind/brain literally performs computations. Moreover, performing computations is crucial to explaining what the mind/brain does, qua mind/brain. Unfortunately, most scientists fail to consider analog computation as a legitimate and theoretically useful type of computation in addition to digital computation; to the extent that analog computation <jats:italic>is</jats:italic> acknowledged, it is mostly based on a simplistic and incomplete understanding. Taking computation to consist of only one type (i.e., digital) while ignoring another, interestingly distinct type (i.e., analog) leads to an impoverished understanding of what it could mean for minds/brains to compute. A full appreciation and understanding of analog computation—particularly in relation to digital computation—allows researchers to develop computational frameworks and hypotheses in new and exciting ways. Thus, somewhat counterintuitively, looking to the once‐dominant computing paradigm of yesteryear can provide novel computational ways of thinking about the mind and brain.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\\\"simple\\\"> <jats:list-item>Philosophy &gt; Foundations of Cognitive Science</jats:list-item> </jats:list>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIREs Cognitive Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIREs Cognitive Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1679\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知科学建立在这样一种理念之上,即可以用计算术语来理解心智/大脑。虽然科学中的计算建模无处不在,但认知科学更坚定地认为,心智/大脑确实在进行计算。此外,进行计算对于解释心智/大脑之为心智/大脑至关重要。遗憾的是,除了数字计算之外,大多数科学家都没有把模拟计算视为一种合法的、理论上有用的计算类型;即使模拟计算得到了承认,也大多是基于一种简单化的、不完整的理解。认为计算只包括一种类型(即数字计算),而忽略了另一种有趣而独特的类型(即模拟计算),导致我们对思维/大脑计算的含义的理解贫乏。充分认识和理解模拟计算,尤其是与数字计算的关系,可以让研究人员以全新的、令人兴奋的方式开发计算框架和假设。因此,有点反直觉的是,展望昔日一度占主导地位的计算范式,可以为思考心智和大脑提供新颖的计算方式:哲学> 认知科学基础
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computation for cognitive science: Analog versus digital
Cognitive science was founded on the idea that the mind/brain can be understood in computational terms. While computational modeling in science is ubiquitous, cognitive science takes the stronger stance that the mind/brain literally performs computations. Moreover, performing computations is crucial to explaining what the mind/brain does, qua mind/brain. Unfortunately, most scientists fail to consider analog computation as a legitimate and theoretically useful type of computation in addition to digital computation; to the extent that analog computation is acknowledged, it is mostly based on a simplistic and incomplete understanding. Taking computation to consist of only one type (i.e., digital) while ignoring another, interestingly distinct type (i.e., analog) leads to an impoverished understanding of what it could mean for minds/brains to compute. A full appreciation and understanding of analog computation—particularly in relation to digital computation—allows researchers to develop computational frameworks and hypotheses in new and exciting ways. Thus, somewhat counterintuitively, looking to the once‐dominant computing paradigm of yesteryear can provide novel computational ways of thinking about the mind and brain.This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Foundations of Cognitive Science
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The strategic allocation theory of vigilance Local brain abnormalities in emotional disorders: Evidence from resting state fMRI studies Children's anthropomorphism of inanimate agents Comparing cognition across major transitions using the hierarchy of formal automata Computation for cognitive science: Analog versus digital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1