应用 RANS/LES 混合方法模拟冲击诱发的湍流边界层分离

A. I. Troshin, S. V. Bakhne
{"title":"应用 RANS/LES 混合方法模拟冲击诱发的湍流边界层分离","authors":"A. I. Troshin, S. V. Bakhne","doi":"10.1134/s2070048224010113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>The results of shock-induced turbulent boundary layer separation simulations using scale-resolving methods with wall modelling (WMLES) are presented. A test case is chosen for which experimental data and reference large eddy simulation results are available. The IDDES method based on the SST turbulence model in the WMLES mode is compared with a similar method in which the explicit subgrid scale model is turned off. In the second approach, two schemes of the WENO family are considered. In each case, two grids of different densities are employed. The separation size, pressure, and friction coefficient distributions along the wall, and one-point pressure probability density functions at two reference points are compared. An unexpected result is demonstrated: in all the eddy-resolving simulations, the separation region’s length turns out to be underestimated by 15–28%, and no significant reduction in the error with grid refinement is observed. Possible reasons for this phenomenon are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":38050,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Hybrid RANS/LES Methods for the Simulation of Shock-Induced Turbulent Boundary Layer Separation\",\"authors\":\"A. I. Troshin, S. V. Bakhne\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/s2070048224010113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Abstract</h3><p>The results of shock-induced turbulent boundary layer separation simulations using scale-resolving methods with wall modelling (WMLES) are presented. A test case is chosen for which experimental data and reference large eddy simulation results are available. The IDDES method based on the SST turbulence model in the WMLES mode is compared with a similar method in which the explicit subgrid scale model is turned off. In the second approach, two schemes of the WENO family are considered. In each case, two grids of different densities are employed. The separation size, pressure, and friction coefficient distributions along the wall, and one-point pressure probability density functions at two reference points are compared. An unexpected result is demonstrated: in all the eddy-resolving simulations, the separation region’s length turns out to be underestimated by 15–28%, and no significant reduction in the error with grid refinement is observed. Possible reasons for this phenomenon are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1134/s2070048224010113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s2070048224010113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 本文介绍了利用尺度求解方法和壁面建模(WMLES)进行的冲击诱导湍流边界层分离模拟结果。选取了一个有实验数据和参考大涡模拟结果的测试案例。在 WMLES 模式下,基于 SST 湍流模型的 IDDES 方法与关闭显式子网格尺度模型的类似方法进行了比较。在第二种方法中,考虑了 WENO 系列的两种方案。在每种情况下,都采用了两个不同密度的网格。比较了沿壁的分离尺寸、压力和摩擦系数分布,以及两个参考点的单点压力概率密度函数。结果出乎意料:在所有涡流解析模拟中,分离区域的长度都被低估了 15%-28%,而且网格细化后误差并没有明显减小。本文讨论了造成这种现象的可能原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of Hybrid RANS/LES Methods for the Simulation of Shock-Induced Turbulent Boundary Layer Separation

Abstract

The results of shock-induced turbulent boundary layer separation simulations using scale-resolving methods with wall modelling (WMLES) are presented. A test case is chosen for which experimental data and reference large eddy simulation results are available. The IDDES method based on the SST turbulence model in the WMLES mode is compared with a similar method in which the explicit subgrid scale model is turned off. In the second approach, two schemes of the WENO family are considered. In each case, two grids of different densities are employed. The separation size, pressure, and friction coefficient distributions along the wall, and one-point pressure probability density functions at two reference points are compared. An unexpected result is demonstrated: in all the eddy-resolving simulations, the separation region’s length turns out to be underestimated by 15–28%, and no significant reduction in the error with grid refinement is observed. Possible reasons for this phenomenon are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations
Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations Mathematics-Computational Mathematics
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations  is a journal that publishes high-quality and original articles at the forefront of development of mathematical models, numerical methods, computer-assisted studies in science and engineering with the potential for impact across the sciences, and construction of massively parallel codes for supercomputers. The problem-oriented papers are devoted to various problems including industrial mathematics, numerical simulation in multiscale and multiphysics, materials science, chemistry, economics, social, and life sciences.
期刊最新文献
Numerical Modeling of Compressible Mixing Layers with a Bicompact Scheme Numerical Simulation of a Gas Flow in a Stage-Diffuser System in a Wide Range of Modes with Experimental Verification A Model of the Russian Banking System with a Breakdown of the Main Asset and Liability Categories by Maturity Numerical Modeling of Noise Generation by Different Propeller Configurations of a Multicopter Numerical Modeling of a Groundwater Flow in Fractured Porous Media Based on the DFM Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1