根据中亚数据库得出的经验关系预测岩崩影响区域的面积

IF 5.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Landslides Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1007/s10346-024-02264-2
Alexander Strom
{"title":"根据中亚数据库得出的经验关系预测岩崩影响区域的面积","authors":"Alexander Strom","doi":"10.1007/s10346-024-02264-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mobility of long-runout catastrophic landslides (debris flows, debris and rock avalanches) can be characterized by several parameters. Those, allowing predicting exposure of elements at risk that might be threatened by such hazardous natural phenomena if they will occur—the affected area and runout, are most important for risk assessment. They can be estimated using two general approaches—one based on the numerical modeling and another one based on the empirical relationships between runout and affected area on the one hand and parameters characterizing the potential source zone on the other hand. The latter are volume of the anticipated rock slope failure and height of the unstable slope. Both can be assessed prior to failure with certain accuracy by contrast with the height drop defined as the elevation difference between headscarp crown and the deposit tip. The optimal input parameter is the product of the unstable slope height and possible failure volume that is, in general, proportional to the potential energy of the unstable rock massif. According to the analysis of the Central Asian rockslides/rock avalanches database that includes quantitative parameters of 515 case studies with defined confinement, the relationships of such product with runout and affected area have high correlation coefficients regardless of the confinement conditions and, therefore, allow prediction of the parameters in question with sufficient reliability. It is pointed out that requirements to the accuracy of slope height and failure volume assessment depend on a large extent on the variability range of these parameters within the inventories used to derive the empirical relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":17938,"journal":{"name":"Landslides","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of the dimensions of rock avalanches’ affected areas based on the empirical relationships derived from the Central Asian database\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Strom\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10346-024-02264-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mobility of long-runout catastrophic landslides (debris flows, debris and rock avalanches) can be characterized by several parameters. Those, allowing predicting exposure of elements at risk that might be threatened by such hazardous natural phenomena if they will occur—the affected area and runout, are most important for risk assessment. They can be estimated using two general approaches—one based on the numerical modeling and another one based on the empirical relationships between runout and affected area on the one hand and parameters characterizing the potential source zone on the other hand. The latter are volume of the anticipated rock slope failure and height of the unstable slope. Both can be assessed prior to failure with certain accuracy by contrast with the height drop defined as the elevation difference between headscarp crown and the deposit tip. The optimal input parameter is the product of the unstable slope height and possible failure volume that is, in general, proportional to the potential energy of the unstable rock massif. According to the analysis of the Central Asian rockslides/rock avalanches database that includes quantitative parameters of 515 case studies with defined confinement, the relationships of such product with runout and affected area have high correlation coefficients regardless of the confinement conditions and, therefore, allow prediction of the parameters in question with sufficient reliability. It is pointed out that requirements to the accuracy of slope height and failure volume assessment depend on a large extent on the variability range of these parameters within the inventories used to derive the empirical relationships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landslides\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landslides\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02264-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landslides","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02264-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

远距离灾难性滑坡(泥石流、碎石和岩崩)的流动性可以通过几个参数来描述。这些参数可用于预测在发生此类危险自然现象时可能受到威胁的风险要素的暴露情况--受影响区域和流动性,对风险评估最为重要。可以采用两种一般方法对其进行估算,一种是基于数值建模,另一种是基于跳动和受影响区域之间的经验关系,以及潜在源区的特征参数。后者是预期岩石斜坡崩塌的体积和不稳定斜坡的高度。这两个参数都可以在塌方前进行评估,并具有一定的准确性,而高度落差则被定义为坡顶和坡顶之间的高差。最佳输入参数是不稳定斜坡高度与可能崩塌体积的乘积,一般来说,这与不稳定岩体的势能成正比。中亚岩石滑坡/岩崩数据库包括 515 个案例研究的定量参数,根据对该数据库的分析,无论封闭条件如何,该乘积与跳动和受影响面积的关系都具有很高的相关系数,因此可以充分可靠地预测有关参数。报告指出,对边坡高度和破坏体积评估准确性的要求在很大程度上取决于用于推导经验关系的清单中这些参数的变化范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of the dimensions of rock avalanches’ affected areas based on the empirical relationships derived from the Central Asian database

Mobility of long-runout catastrophic landslides (debris flows, debris and rock avalanches) can be characterized by several parameters. Those, allowing predicting exposure of elements at risk that might be threatened by such hazardous natural phenomena if they will occur—the affected area and runout, are most important for risk assessment. They can be estimated using two general approaches—one based on the numerical modeling and another one based on the empirical relationships between runout and affected area on the one hand and parameters characterizing the potential source zone on the other hand. The latter are volume of the anticipated rock slope failure and height of the unstable slope. Both can be assessed prior to failure with certain accuracy by contrast with the height drop defined as the elevation difference between headscarp crown and the deposit tip. The optimal input parameter is the product of the unstable slope height and possible failure volume that is, in general, proportional to the potential energy of the unstable rock massif. According to the analysis of the Central Asian rockslides/rock avalanches database that includes quantitative parameters of 515 case studies with defined confinement, the relationships of such product with runout and affected area have high correlation coefficients regardless of the confinement conditions and, therefore, allow prediction of the parameters in question with sufficient reliability. It is pointed out that requirements to the accuracy of slope height and failure volume assessment depend on a large extent on the variability range of these parameters within the inventories used to derive the empirical relationships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landslides
Landslides 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
14.90%
发文量
191
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Landslides are gravitational mass movements of rock, debris or earth. They may occur in conjunction with other major natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Expanding urbanization and changing land-use practices have increased the incidence of landslide disasters. Landslides as catastrophic events include human injury, loss of life and economic devastation and are studied as part of the fields of earth, water and engineering sciences. The aim of the journal Landslides is to be the common platform for the publication of integrated research on landslide processes, hazards, risk analysis, mitigation, and the protection of our cultural heritage and the environment. The journal publishes research papers, news of recent landslide events and information on the activities of the International Consortium on Landslides. - Landslide dynamics, mechanisms and processes - Landslide risk evaluation: hazard assessment, hazard mapping, and vulnerability assessment - Geological, Geotechnical, Hydrological and Geophysical modeling - Effects of meteorological, hydrological and global climatic change factors - Monitoring including remote sensing and other non-invasive systems - New technology, expert and intelligent systems - Application of GIS techniques - Rock slides, rock falls, debris flows, earth flows, and lateral spreads - Large-scale landslides, lahars and pyroclastic flows in volcanic zones - Marine and reservoir related landslides - Landslide related tsunamis and seiches - Landslide disasters in urban areas and along critical infrastructure - Landslides and natural resources - Land development and land-use practices - Landslide remedial measures / prevention works - Temporal and spatial prediction of landslides - Early warning and evacuation - Global landslide database
期刊最新文献
Typical characteristics and causes of giant landslides in the upper reaches of the Yellow River, China Advancing reservoir landslide stability assessment via TS-InSAR and airborne LiDAR observations in the Daping landslide group, Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China Preliminary analysis of the wildfire on March 15, 2024, and the following post-fire debris flows in Yajiang County, Sichuan, China A new remote-sensing-based volcanic debris avalanche database of Northwest Argentina (Central Andes) A massive lateral moraine collapse triggered the 2023 South Lhonak Lake outburst flood, Sikkim Himalayas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1