受 Sprint 启发的一对一上线后培训课程(Mini-Sprint)提高了医疗服务提供者的电子健康记录效率和满意度

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1786368
July Chen, Wei Ning Chi, Urmila Ravichandran, Anthony Solomonides, Jeffrey Trimark, Shilpan Patel, Bruce McNulty, Nirav S. Shah, Stacy Brown
{"title":"受 Sprint 启发的一对一上线后培训课程(Mini-Sprint)提高了医疗服务提供者的电子健康记录效率和满意度","authors":"July Chen, Wei Ning Chi, Urmila Ravichandran, Anthony Solomonides, Jeffrey Trimark, Shilpan Patel, Bruce McNulty, Nirav S. Shah, Stacy Brown","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1786368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\n<b>Background</b> Inefficient electronic health record (EHR) usage increases the documentation burden on physicians and other providers, which increases cognitive load and contributes to provider burnout. Studies show that EHR efficiency sessions, optimization sprints, reduce burnout using a resource-intense five-person team. We implemented sprint-inspired one-on-one post-go-live efficiency training sessions (mini-sprints) as a more economical training option directed at providers.</p> <p>\n<b>Objectives</b> We evaluated a post-go-live mini-sprint intervention to assess provider satisfaction and efficiency.</p> <p>\n<b>Methods</b> NorthShore University HealthSystem implemented one-on-one provider-to-provider mini-sprint sessions to optimize provider workflow within the EHR platform. The physician informaticist completed a 9-point checklist of efficiency tips with physician trainees covering schedule organization, chart review, speed buttons, billing, note personalization/optimization, preference lists, quick actions, and quick tips. We collected postsession survey data assessing for net promoter score (NPS) and open-ended feedback. We conducted financial analysis of pre- and post-mini-sprint efficiency levels and financial data.</p> <p>\n<b>Results</b> Seventy-six sessions were conducted with 32 primary care physicians, 28 specialty physicians, and 16 nonphysician providers within primary care and other areas. Thirty-seven physicians completed the postsession survey. The average NPS for the completed mini-sprint sessions was 97. The proficiency score had a median of 6.12 (Interquartile range (IQR): 4.71–7.64) before training, and a median of 7.10 (IQR: 6.25–8.49) after training. Financial data analysis indicates that higher level billing codes were used at a greater frequency post-mini-sprint. The revenue increase 12 months post-mini-sprint was $213,234, leading to a return of $75,559.50 for 40 providers, or $1,888.98 per provider in a 12-month period.</p> <p>\n<b>Conclusion</b> Our data show that mini-sprint sessions were effective in optimizing efficiency within the EHR platform. Financial analysis demonstrates that this type of training program is sustainable and pays for itself. There was high satisfaction with the mini-sprint training modality, and feedback indicated an interest in further mini-sprint training sessions for physicians and nonphysician staff.</p> ","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sprint-inspired One-on-One Post-Go-Live Training Session (Mini-Sprint) Improves Provider Electronic Health Record Efficiency and Satisfaction\",\"authors\":\"July Chen, Wei Ning Chi, Urmila Ravichandran, Anthony Solomonides, Jeffrey Trimark, Shilpan Patel, Bruce McNulty, Nirav S. Shah, Stacy Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1786368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>\\n<b>Background</b> Inefficient electronic health record (EHR) usage increases the documentation burden on physicians and other providers, which increases cognitive load and contributes to provider burnout. Studies show that EHR efficiency sessions, optimization sprints, reduce burnout using a resource-intense five-person team. We implemented sprint-inspired one-on-one post-go-live efficiency training sessions (mini-sprints) as a more economical training option directed at providers.</p> <p>\\n<b>Objectives</b> We evaluated a post-go-live mini-sprint intervention to assess provider satisfaction and efficiency.</p> <p>\\n<b>Methods</b> NorthShore University HealthSystem implemented one-on-one provider-to-provider mini-sprint sessions to optimize provider workflow within the EHR platform. The physician informaticist completed a 9-point checklist of efficiency tips with physician trainees covering schedule organization, chart review, speed buttons, billing, note personalization/optimization, preference lists, quick actions, and quick tips. We collected postsession survey data assessing for net promoter score (NPS) and open-ended feedback. We conducted financial analysis of pre- and post-mini-sprint efficiency levels and financial data.</p> <p>\\n<b>Results</b> Seventy-six sessions were conducted with 32 primary care physicians, 28 specialty physicians, and 16 nonphysician providers within primary care and other areas. Thirty-seven physicians completed the postsession survey. The average NPS for the completed mini-sprint sessions was 97. The proficiency score had a median of 6.12 (Interquartile range (IQR): 4.71–7.64) before training, and a median of 7.10 (IQR: 6.25–8.49) after training. Financial data analysis indicates that higher level billing codes were used at a greater frequency post-mini-sprint. The revenue increase 12 months post-mini-sprint was $213,234, leading to a return of $75,559.50 for 40 providers, or $1,888.98 per provider in a 12-month period.</p> <p>\\n<b>Conclusion</b> Our data show that mini-sprint sessions were effective in optimizing efficiency within the EHR platform. Financial analysis demonstrates that this type of training program is sustainable and pays for itself. There was high satisfaction with the mini-sprint training modality, and feedback indicated an interest in further mini-sprint training sessions for physicians and nonphysician staff.</p> \",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786368\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786368","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 电子病历(EHR)的低效使用加重了医生和其他医疗服务提供者的文档记录负担,从而增加了认知负荷并导致医疗服务提供者的职业倦怠。研究表明,电子病历效率课程、优化冲刺可以通过使用资源密集型五人团队来减少职业倦怠。我们实施了由冲刺启发的一对一上线后效率培训课程(迷你冲刺),作为针对医疗服务提供者的更经济的培训方案。目标 我们对直播后迷你冲刺干预进行了评估,以评估医疗服务提供者的满意度和效率。方法 NorthShore University HealthSystem 实施了一对一的医疗服务提供者迷你打印课程,以优化 EHR 平台内的医疗服务提供者工作流程。医生信息学家与受训医生一起完成了一份 9 点效率提示清单,内容包括日程安排、病历审查、快速按钮、账单、笔记个性化/优化、偏好列表、快速操作和快速提示。我们收集了会后调查数据,评估净促进者得分(NPS)和开放式反馈。我们对迷你打印前后的效率水平和财务数据进行了财务分析。结果 对 32 名初级保健医生、28 名专科医生和 16 名初级保健和其他领域的非医生提供者进行了 76 次培训。37 名医生完成了会后调查。完成迷你冲印课程的平均 NPS 为 97。培训前的熟练程度得分中位数为 6.12(四分位数间距 (IQR):4.71-7.64),培训后的熟练程度得分中位数为 7.10(四分位数间距 (IQR):6.25-8.49)。财务数据分析显示,迷你培训后使用高级计费代码的频率更高。迷你培训后 12 个月的收入增长为 213 234 美元,40 名医疗服务提供者的回报为 75 559.50 美元,即每位医疗服务提供者在 12 个月内的回报为 1 888.98 美元。结论 我们的数据显示,迷你打印课程能有效优化电子病历平台的效率。财务分析表明,这种培训计划是可持续的,并能收回成本。对迷你打印培训模式的满意度很高,反馈意见表明,医生和非医生工作人员对进一步开展迷你打印培训课程很感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sprint-inspired One-on-One Post-Go-Live Training Session (Mini-Sprint) Improves Provider Electronic Health Record Efficiency and Satisfaction

Background Inefficient electronic health record (EHR) usage increases the documentation burden on physicians and other providers, which increases cognitive load and contributes to provider burnout. Studies show that EHR efficiency sessions, optimization sprints, reduce burnout using a resource-intense five-person team. We implemented sprint-inspired one-on-one post-go-live efficiency training sessions (mini-sprints) as a more economical training option directed at providers.

Objectives We evaluated a post-go-live mini-sprint intervention to assess provider satisfaction and efficiency.

Methods NorthShore University HealthSystem implemented one-on-one provider-to-provider mini-sprint sessions to optimize provider workflow within the EHR platform. The physician informaticist completed a 9-point checklist of efficiency tips with physician trainees covering schedule organization, chart review, speed buttons, billing, note personalization/optimization, preference lists, quick actions, and quick tips. We collected postsession survey data assessing for net promoter score (NPS) and open-ended feedback. We conducted financial analysis of pre- and post-mini-sprint efficiency levels and financial data.

Results Seventy-six sessions were conducted with 32 primary care physicians, 28 specialty physicians, and 16 nonphysician providers within primary care and other areas. Thirty-seven physicians completed the postsession survey. The average NPS for the completed mini-sprint sessions was 97. The proficiency score had a median of 6.12 (Interquartile range (IQR): 4.71–7.64) before training, and a median of 7.10 (IQR: 6.25–8.49) after training. Financial data analysis indicates that higher level billing codes were used at a greater frequency post-mini-sprint. The revenue increase 12 months post-mini-sprint was $213,234, leading to a return of $75,559.50 for 40 providers, or $1,888.98 per provider in a 12-month period.

Conclusion Our data show that mini-sprint sessions were effective in optimizing efficiency within the EHR platform. Financial analysis demonstrates that this type of training program is sustainable and pays for itself. There was high satisfaction with the mini-sprint training modality, and feedback indicated an interest in further mini-sprint training sessions for physicians and nonphysician staff.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Aligning Residency Note Templates with CMS Evaluation and Management Documentation Requirements. Multisite implementation of a sexual health survey and clinical decision support to promote adolescent sexually transmitted infection screening. Optimizing Resident Charge Capture with Disappearing Help Text in Note Templates. Special Section on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Informatics: Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rural and Underserved Populations. The Effect of Ambient Artificial Intelligence Notes on Provider Burnout.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1