神经源性膀胱泌尿生殖系统重建术后的决策遗憾及其对生活质量的影响:后天性和先天性脊髓损伤的比较

Pm & R Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13157
João Pedro Emrich Accioly, James Bena, Huijun Xiao, Stacy Jeong, Roger K. Khouri, Kenneth W. Angermeier, Molly Dewitt‐Foy, Gregory Nemunaitis, Hadley M. Wood
{"title":"神经源性膀胱泌尿生殖系统重建术后的决策遗憾及其对生活质量的影响:后天性和先天性脊髓损伤的比较","authors":"João Pedro Emrich Accioly, James Bena, Huijun Xiao, Stacy Jeong, Roger K. Khouri, Kenneth W. Angermeier, Molly Dewitt‐Foy, Gregory Nemunaitis, Hadley M. Wood","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionPatient expectations and baseline health are important drivers of outcomes following major genitourinary reconstructive surgery for neurogenic bladder (NGB). Differences in expectations and quality of life (QoL) improvements among different populations with NGB remain insufficiently explored in the literature.ObjectiveTo compare decisional regret (DR) and urinary‐related QoL (UrQoL) in patients undergoing urinary diversion for NGB arising from spinal cord injury of acquired (A‐SCI) and congenital (C‐SCI) etiologies. We hypothesize that patients with A‐SCI have higher expectations of improvement in QoL following surgery when compared with C‐SCI, which may lead to higher DR and decreased UrQoL, postoperatively.DesignIn this cross‐sectional survey study, we compared A‐SCI to C‐SCI in terms of DR, UrQoL, and postoperative changes in self‐reported physical health, mental health, and pain using validated patient‐reported outcome measures.SettingParticipants were enrolled from a quaternary care institution via mail and MyChart.ParticipantsThe A‐SCI group consistied of 17 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury the C‐SCI group was composed of 20 patients with spina bifida.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresThe Decisional Regret Scale, Short form‐ Qualiveen (SF‐Qualiveen), and Patient‐reported outcomes measurement Information system‐10 (PROMIS‐10) Global Health surveys.ResultsThe A‐SCI group displayed poorer preoperative physical health than the C‐SCI cohort, but absolute postoperative changes in this score, along with mental health score and pain level, were not significant after adjusting for baseline scores and follow‐up time. SF‐Qualiveen scores revealed significantly worse impact of NGB in UrQoL for A‐SCI than for C‐SCI when adjusted for other factors. No differences in DR were seen between the groups.ConclusionsPatients with A‐SCI demonstrate lower self‐reported baseline physical health compared with patients with C‐SCI, which may have implications in setting patient expectations when undergoing urinary diversion. In this small cohort, we found a milder self‐reported postoperative impact of NGB in UrQoL in patients with C‐SCI.","PeriodicalId":20287,"journal":{"name":"Pm & R","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decisional regret and impacts on quality of life following genitourinary reconstruction for neurogenic bladder: A comparison between acquired and congenital spinal cord injury\",\"authors\":\"João Pedro Emrich Accioly, James Bena, Huijun Xiao, Stacy Jeong, Roger K. Khouri, Kenneth W. Angermeier, Molly Dewitt‐Foy, Gregory Nemunaitis, Hadley M. Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionPatient expectations and baseline health are important drivers of outcomes following major genitourinary reconstructive surgery for neurogenic bladder (NGB). Differences in expectations and quality of life (QoL) improvements among different populations with NGB remain insufficiently explored in the literature.ObjectiveTo compare decisional regret (DR) and urinary‐related QoL (UrQoL) in patients undergoing urinary diversion for NGB arising from spinal cord injury of acquired (A‐SCI) and congenital (C‐SCI) etiologies. We hypothesize that patients with A‐SCI have higher expectations of improvement in QoL following surgery when compared with C‐SCI, which may lead to higher DR and decreased UrQoL, postoperatively.DesignIn this cross‐sectional survey study, we compared A‐SCI to C‐SCI in terms of DR, UrQoL, and postoperative changes in self‐reported physical health, mental health, and pain using validated patient‐reported outcome measures.SettingParticipants were enrolled from a quaternary care institution via mail and MyChart.ParticipantsThe A‐SCI group consistied of 17 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury the C‐SCI group was composed of 20 patients with spina bifida.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresThe Decisional Regret Scale, Short form‐ Qualiveen (SF‐Qualiveen), and Patient‐reported outcomes measurement Information system‐10 (PROMIS‐10) Global Health surveys.ResultsThe A‐SCI group displayed poorer preoperative physical health than the C‐SCI cohort, but absolute postoperative changes in this score, along with mental health score and pain level, were not significant after adjusting for baseline scores and follow‐up time. SF‐Qualiveen scores revealed significantly worse impact of NGB in UrQoL for A‐SCI than for C‐SCI when adjusted for other factors. No differences in DR were seen between the groups.ConclusionsPatients with A‐SCI demonstrate lower self‐reported baseline physical health compared with patients with C‐SCI, which may have implications in setting patient expectations when undergoing urinary diversion. In this small cohort, we found a milder self‐reported postoperative impact of NGB in UrQoL in patients with C‐SCI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pm & R\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pm & R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pm & R","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言患者的期望值和基线健康状况是影响神经源性膀胱(NGB)泌尿生殖系统重建手术治疗效果的重要因素。目的比较因后天性脊髓损伤(A-SCI)和先天性脊髓损伤(C-SCI)引起的 NGB 而接受尿流改道手术的患者的决策后悔(DR)和泌尿相关生活质量(UrQoL)。我们假设,与 C-SCI 相比,A-SCI 患者对术后 QoL 的改善期望更高,这可能会导致术后 DR 增加、UrQoL 降低。在这项横断面调查研究中,我们使用经过验证的患者报告结果指标,比较了 A-SCI 和 C-SCI 在 DR、UrQoL 以及术后自我报告的身体健康、心理健康和疼痛方面的变化。参与者A-SCI组包括17名外伤性脊髓损伤患者,C-SCI组包括20名脊柱裂患者。干预措施不适用。主要结果测量决策后悔量表、简表-Qualiveen(SF-Qualiveen)和患者报告结果测量信息系统-10(PROMIS-10)全球健康调查。结果 A-SCI组的术前身体健康状况比C-SCI组差,但在调整基线评分和随访时间后,该评分以及心理健康评分和疼痛程度的术后绝对变化并不显著。SF-Qualiveen 评分显示,在对其他因素进行调整后,NGB 对 A-SCI 患者尿质量生活的影响明显低于 C-SCI。结论与 C-SCI 患者相比,A-SCI 患者自我报告的基线身体健康状况较低,这可能会影响患者在接受尿路转流术时的期望值。在这一小型队列中,我们发现 C-SCI 患者自我报告的术后 NGB 对尿质生活的影响较轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decisional regret and impacts on quality of life following genitourinary reconstruction for neurogenic bladder: A comparison between acquired and congenital spinal cord injury
IntroductionPatient expectations and baseline health are important drivers of outcomes following major genitourinary reconstructive surgery for neurogenic bladder (NGB). Differences in expectations and quality of life (QoL) improvements among different populations with NGB remain insufficiently explored in the literature.ObjectiveTo compare decisional regret (DR) and urinary‐related QoL (UrQoL) in patients undergoing urinary diversion for NGB arising from spinal cord injury of acquired (A‐SCI) and congenital (C‐SCI) etiologies. We hypothesize that patients with A‐SCI have higher expectations of improvement in QoL following surgery when compared with C‐SCI, which may lead to higher DR and decreased UrQoL, postoperatively.DesignIn this cross‐sectional survey study, we compared A‐SCI to C‐SCI in terms of DR, UrQoL, and postoperative changes in self‐reported physical health, mental health, and pain using validated patient‐reported outcome measures.SettingParticipants were enrolled from a quaternary care institution via mail and MyChart.ParticipantsThe A‐SCI group consistied of 17 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury the C‐SCI group was composed of 20 patients with spina bifida.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresThe Decisional Regret Scale, Short form‐ Qualiveen (SF‐Qualiveen), and Patient‐reported outcomes measurement Information system‐10 (PROMIS‐10) Global Health surveys.ResultsThe A‐SCI group displayed poorer preoperative physical health than the C‐SCI cohort, but absolute postoperative changes in this score, along with mental health score and pain level, were not significant after adjusting for baseline scores and follow‐up time. SF‐Qualiveen scores revealed significantly worse impact of NGB in UrQoL for A‐SCI than for C‐SCI when adjusted for other factors. No differences in DR were seen between the groups.ConclusionsPatients with A‐SCI demonstrate lower self‐reported baseline physical health compared with patients with C‐SCI, which may have implications in setting patient expectations when undergoing urinary diversion. In this small cohort, we found a milder self‐reported postoperative impact of NGB in UrQoL in patients with C‐SCI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Academy News – September 2024 PM&R Spanish Translated Abstracts Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinical experiences: A narrative review of curricula and educational interventions Can blood‐flow restriction resistance training enhance remote strength transfer? A systematic review with meta‐analysis Creating and confirming observable professional activities (OPAs): A pilot study evaluating the feasibility of OPAs on a residency inpatient spinal cord injury rotation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1