开发并验证用于评估玉米灰叶斑病严重程度和叶面杀真菌剂防治效果的标准面积图集

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES Journal of Phytopathology Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1111/jph.13311
Maria Gabriela de Carlos da Rocha, Adriano Augusto de Paiva Custódio, Lucas Henrique Fantin, Karla Braga de Oliveira, Hércules Diniz Campos, Marcelo Giovanetti Canteri, Henrique da Silva Silveira Duarte
{"title":"开发并验证用于评估玉米灰叶斑病严重程度和叶面杀真菌剂防治效果的标准面积图集","authors":"Maria Gabriela de Carlos da Rocha,&nbsp;Adriano Augusto de Paiva Custódio,&nbsp;Lucas Henrique Fantin,&nbsp;Karla Braga de Oliveira,&nbsp;Hércules Diniz Campos,&nbsp;Marcelo Giovanetti Canteri,&nbsp;Henrique da Silva Silveira Duarte","doi":"10.1111/jph.13311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grey leaf spot (GLS), caused by <i>Cercospora</i> spp., has become a very important foliar disease for second-crop corn season, mainly in South America. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a standard area diagram set (SADs) to estimate the severity of GLS and to apply the SADs established in this study to evaluate the efficacy of fungicides for GLS control in field trials. The SADs with nine levels of severity (0.5; 2; 5; 10; 20; 30; 40; 50 and 60%) improved accuracy, precision and reliability. To evaluate the control of GLS in corn, two experiments spraying chemical fungicides were conducted, one in Rio Verde (GO) (experiment A) and another in Chapadão do Sul (MS) (experiment B). Both experiments were conducted in randomized block design, with 10 treatments and four replicates. For the severity assessment, the SADs elaborated in this study was used. From this severity data over time, disease progress curves, area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC), and yield were obtained. Based on the AUDPC and yield values, all treatments differed from the control. The fungicide fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin + mefentrifluconazole had the highest value, giving 72.8% control efficacy and the highest yield maintenance of 43.5%. The other treatments had an intermediate control efficacy and yield. The SADs proposed here is a useful tool for improving visual assessments of GLS severity on corn leaves and fungicides can be used for integrated disease management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a standard area diagram set to assess corn grey leaf spot severity and foliar fungicide control efficacy\",\"authors\":\"Maria Gabriela de Carlos da Rocha,&nbsp;Adriano Augusto de Paiva Custódio,&nbsp;Lucas Henrique Fantin,&nbsp;Karla Braga de Oliveira,&nbsp;Hércules Diniz Campos,&nbsp;Marcelo Giovanetti Canteri,&nbsp;Henrique da Silva Silveira Duarte\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jph.13311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Grey leaf spot (GLS), caused by <i>Cercospora</i> spp., has become a very important foliar disease for second-crop corn season, mainly in South America. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a standard area diagram set (SADs) to estimate the severity of GLS and to apply the SADs established in this study to evaluate the efficacy of fungicides for GLS control in field trials. The SADs with nine levels of severity (0.5; 2; 5; 10; 20; 30; 40; 50 and 60%) improved accuracy, precision and reliability. To evaluate the control of GLS in corn, two experiments spraying chemical fungicides were conducted, one in Rio Verde (GO) (experiment A) and another in Chapadão do Sul (MS) (experiment B). Both experiments were conducted in randomized block design, with 10 treatments and four replicates. For the severity assessment, the SADs elaborated in this study was used. From this severity data over time, disease progress curves, area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC), and yield were obtained. Based on the AUDPC and yield values, all treatments differed from the control. The fungicide fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin + mefentrifluconazole had the highest value, giving 72.8% control efficacy and the highest yield maintenance of 43.5%. The other treatments had an intermediate control efficacy and yield. The SADs proposed here is a useful tool for improving visual assessments of GLS severity on corn leaves and fungicides can be used for integrated disease management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Phytopathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Phytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.13311\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.13311","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由 Cercospora spp.引起的灰叶斑病(GLS)已成为二季玉米的一种非常重要的叶面病害,主要发生在南美洲。因此,本研究旨在开发和验证一套标准面积图(SADs)来估计灰叶斑病的严重程度,并在田间试验中应用本研究建立的 SADs 来评估杀菌剂对灰叶斑病的防治效果。九级严重程度(0.5;2;5;10;20;30;40;50 和 60%)的 SAD 提高了准确性、精确性和可靠性。为了评估玉米中 GLS 的控制情况,进行了两次喷洒化学杀菌剂的试验,一次在 Rio Verde(南澳大利亚州)(试验 A),另一次在 Chapadão do Sul(南澳大利亚州)(试验 B)。两项实验均采用随机区组设计,共设 10 个处理和 4 个重复。严重性评估采用了本研究中阐述的 SADs。根据随时间变化的严重程度数据,得出病害进展曲线、病害进展曲线下面积(AUDPC)和产量。根据病害进程曲线下面积和产量值,所有处理都与对照组不同。杀菌剂氟吡菌酰胺+吡唑醚菌酯+甲霜灵的效果值最高,防效为 72.8%,产量保持率最高,为 43.5%。其他处理的防治效果和产量居中。这里提出的 SADs 是改进玉米叶片 GLS 严重程度目测评估的有用工具,杀菌剂可用于病害综合防治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of a standard area diagram set to assess corn grey leaf spot severity and foliar fungicide control efficacy

Grey leaf spot (GLS), caused by Cercospora spp., has become a very important foliar disease for second-crop corn season, mainly in South America. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a standard area diagram set (SADs) to estimate the severity of GLS and to apply the SADs established in this study to evaluate the efficacy of fungicides for GLS control in field trials. The SADs with nine levels of severity (0.5; 2; 5; 10; 20; 30; 40; 50 and 60%) improved accuracy, precision and reliability. To evaluate the control of GLS in corn, two experiments spraying chemical fungicides were conducted, one in Rio Verde (GO) (experiment A) and another in Chapadão do Sul (MS) (experiment B). Both experiments were conducted in randomized block design, with 10 treatments and four replicates. For the severity assessment, the SADs elaborated in this study was used. From this severity data over time, disease progress curves, area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC), and yield were obtained. Based on the AUDPC and yield values, all treatments differed from the control. The fungicide fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin + mefentrifluconazole had the highest value, giving 72.8% control efficacy and the highest yield maintenance of 43.5%. The other treatments had an intermediate control efficacy and yield. The SADs proposed here is a useful tool for improving visual assessments of GLS severity on corn leaves and fungicides can be used for integrated disease management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Phytopathology
Journal of Phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Phytopathology publishes original and review articles on all scientific aspects of applied phytopathology in agricultural and horticultural crops. Preference is given to contributions improving our understanding of the biotic and abiotic determinants of plant diseases, including epidemics and damage potential, as a basis for innovative disease management, modelling and forecasting. This includes practical aspects and the development of methods for disease diagnosis as well as infection bioassays. Studies at the population, organism, physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic level are welcome. The journal scope comprises the pathology and epidemiology of plant diseases caused by microbial pathogens, viruses and nematodes. Accepted papers should advance our conceptual knowledge of plant diseases, rather than presenting descriptive or screening data unrelated to phytopathological mechanisms or functions. Results from unrepeated experimental conditions or data with no or inappropriate statistical processing will not be considered. Authors are encouraged to look at past issues to ensure adherence to the standards of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Pathogenicity and Virulence-Associated Factors of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae and [P. amygdali pv. morsprunorum] Strains From New Zealand Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium) Orchards Unravelling the Complexity of Ginger Rhizome Rot Disease: A Focus on Pathogen Interactions Influence of the Season of Year and Stage of Postharvest Processing on Anthracnose Severity in Bananas in a Savanna Climate in the Brazilian Northeast Natural Occurrence, Morpho-Molecular Characteristics, and Pathogenicity of Fusarium spp. Associated With Chrysanthemum Wilt in Vietnam Caprylic Acid From Vitex mollis Pulp Alters Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Plasma Membrane and Reduces Anthracnose Development on Papaya Fruit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1