跨语言的理解监测--在线反馈的效果

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101928
Lilach Temelman-Yogev, Anat Prior, Tami Katzir
{"title":"跨语言的理解监测--在线反馈的效果","authors":"Lilach Temelman-Yogev,&nbsp;Anat Prior,&nbsp;Tami Katzir","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Reading and comprehending texts is challenging for students in higher education, especially when reading in English as a foreign language (EFL). An important component of efficient reading comprehension is the ability to accurately self-monitor understanding and performance, though most readers are not accurate at monitoring their comprehension.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study investigated whether online, immediate and repetitive feedback on the process of calibration of comprehension, can improve comprehension monitoring when reading in native (L1) and foreign languages (FL), and whether such improvement can be generalized across languages.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Participants were 138 undergraduate Hebrew-English bilingual university students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Monitoring accuracy was calculated through the paradigm of ‘calibration of comprehension’. Participants were divided into four study groups according to the language of reading (L1 or FL) and the exposure to feedback on calibration (with or without). Participants attended a total of five study sessions: a pre-exposure session, three exposure sessions and a fifth post-exposure session.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Only students who engaged with texts in the FL and received feedback showed improved monitoring accuracy. This improvement did not generalize to their L1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Pedagogically, these results indicate that comprehension monitoring skills can be improved through online, immediate and repetitive feedback, especially in the FL. We suggest that FL comprehension was amenable to change because it met the optimal level of text difficulty to engage participants with the monitoring process. Thus, online feedback supported by digital technology may offer distinctive educational opportunities for bolstering comprehension monitoring.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehension monitoring across languages – The effect of online feedback\",\"authors\":\"Lilach Temelman-Yogev,&nbsp;Anat Prior,&nbsp;Tami Katzir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Reading and comprehending texts is challenging for students in higher education, especially when reading in English as a foreign language (EFL). An important component of efficient reading comprehension is the ability to accurately self-monitor understanding and performance, though most readers are not accurate at monitoring their comprehension.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study investigated whether online, immediate and repetitive feedback on the process of calibration of comprehension, can improve comprehension monitoring when reading in native (L1) and foreign languages (FL), and whether such improvement can be generalized across languages.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Participants were 138 undergraduate Hebrew-English bilingual university students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Monitoring accuracy was calculated through the paradigm of ‘calibration of comprehension’. Participants were divided into four study groups according to the language of reading (L1 or FL) and the exposure to feedback on calibration (with or without). Participants attended a total of five study sessions: a pre-exposure session, three exposure sessions and a fifth post-exposure session.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Only students who engaged with texts in the FL and received feedback showed improved monitoring accuracy. This improvement did not generalize to their L1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Pedagogically, these results indicate that comprehension monitoring skills can be improved through online, immediate and repetitive feedback, especially in the FL. We suggest that FL comprehension was amenable to change because it met the optimal level of text difficulty to engage participants with the monitoring process. Thus, online feedback supported by digital technology may offer distinctive educational opportunities for bolstering comprehension monitoring.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000550\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000550","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景阅读和理解文章对于高等教育阶段的学生来说是一项挑战,尤其是在以英语作为外语(EFL)进行阅读时。高效阅读理解的一个重要组成部分是准确自我监控理解和表现的能力,但大多数读者并不能准确监控自己的理解能力。本研究调查了在母语(L1)和外语(FL)阅读时,关于理解校准过程的在线、即时和重复反馈能否改善理解监控,以及这种改善能否在不同语言间推广。根据阅读语言(L1 或 FL)和校准反馈(有或没有),参与者被分为四个学习小组。参加者总共参加了五次学习:一次接触前学习,三次接触学习和第五次接触后学习。结论从教学角度看,这些结果表明,通过在线、即时和重复的反馈,可以提高理解监控技能,尤其是在 FL 中。我们认为,FL 的理解能力是可以改变的,因为它达到了让参与者参与监测过程的最佳文本难度水平。因此,数字技术支持下的在线反馈可为加强理解监控提供独特的教育机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comprehension monitoring across languages – The effect of online feedback

Background

Reading and comprehending texts is challenging for students in higher education, especially when reading in English as a foreign language (EFL). An important component of efficient reading comprehension is the ability to accurately self-monitor understanding and performance, though most readers are not accurate at monitoring their comprehension.

Aims

This study investigated whether online, immediate and repetitive feedback on the process of calibration of comprehension, can improve comprehension monitoring when reading in native (L1) and foreign languages (FL), and whether such improvement can be generalized across languages.

Sample

Participants were 138 undergraduate Hebrew-English bilingual university students.

Methods

Monitoring accuracy was calculated through the paradigm of ‘calibration of comprehension’. Participants were divided into four study groups according to the language of reading (L1 or FL) and the exposure to feedback on calibration (with or without). Participants attended a total of five study sessions: a pre-exposure session, three exposure sessions and a fifth post-exposure session.

Results

Only students who engaged with texts in the FL and received feedback showed improved monitoring accuracy. This improvement did not generalize to their L1.

Conclusions

Pedagogically, these results indicate that comprehension monitoring skills can be improved through online, immediate and repetitive feedback, especially in the FL. We suggest that FL comprehension was amenable to change because it met the optimal level of text difficulty to engage participants with the monitoring process. Thus, online feedback supported by digital technology may offer distinctive educational opportunities for bolstering comprehension monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Nine partner languages, one path: Minority language reading proficiency development among German two-way immersion students Effects of SI-PASS on a high-risk course – A randomized controlled trial Context counts: Unveiling the impact of achievement level on teachers’ text assessment How to teach Bayesian reasoning: An empirical study comparing four different probability training courses Understanding teacher judgments of student motivation: The role of (un-)available cues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1