公共 DNA 条形码数据库的地理和系统发育结构:利用菊形目(叶甲虫)进行评估

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3389/fevo.2024.1305898
Ellie Lo, Rui-E Nie, Alfried P. Vogler
{"title":"公共 DNA 条形码数据库的地理和系统发育结构:利用菊形目(叶甲虫)进行评估","authors":"Ellie Lo, Rui-E Nie, Alfried P. Vogler","doi":"10.3389/fevo.2024.1305898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionDNA barcoding in insects has progressed rapidly, with the ultimate goal of a complete inventory of the world’s species. However, the barcoding effort to date has been driven by a few national campaigns and leaves much of the world unsampled. This study investigates to what degree the current barcode data cover the species diversity across the globe, using the leaf beetle family Chrysomelidae as an example.MethodsA recent version (June 2023) of the Barcode-of-Life database was subjected to test of sampling completeness using the barcode-to-BIN ratio and sampling coverage (SC) metric. All barcodes were placed in a phylogenetic tree of ~600 mitochondrial genomes, applying phylogenetic diversity (PD) and metrics of community phylogenetics to national barcode sets to test for sampling completeness at clade level and reveal the global structure of species diversity.ResultsThe database included 73342 barcodes, grouped into 5310 BINs (species proxies) from 101 countries. Costa Rica contributed nearly half of all barcode sequences, while nearly 50 countries were represented by less than ten barcodes. Only five countries, Costa Rica, Canada, South Africa, Germany, and Spain, had a high sampling completeness, although collectively the barcode database covers most major taxonomic and biogeographically confined lineages. PD showed moderate saturation as more species diversity is added in a country, and community phylogenetics indicated clustering of national faunas. However, at the species level the inventory remained incomplete even in the most intensely sampled countries, and the sampling was insufficient for assessment of global species richness patterns.DiscussionThe sequence-based inventory in Chrysomelidae needs to be greatly expanded to include more areas and deeper local sampling before reaching a knowledge base similar to the existing Linnaean taxonomy. However, placing the barcodes into a backbone phylogenetic tree from mitochondrial genomes, a taxonomically and biogeographically highly structured pattern of global diversity emerges into which all species can be integrated via their barcodes.","PeriodicalId":12367,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The geographic and phylogenetic structure of public DNA barcode databases: an assessment using Chrysomelidae (leaf beetles)\",\"authors\":\"Ellie Lo, Rui-E Nie, Alfried P. Vogler\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fevo.2024.1305898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionDNA barcoding in insects has progressed rapidly, with the ultimate goal of a complete inventory of the world’s species. However, the barcoding effort to date has been driven by a few national campaigns and leaves much of the world unsampled. This study investigates to what degree the current barcode data cover the species diversity across the globe, using the leaf beetle family Chrysomelidae as an example.MethodsA recent version (June 2023) of the Barcode-of-Life database was subjected to test of sampling completeness using the barcode-to-BIN ratio and sampling coverage (SC) metric. All barcodes were placed in a phylogenetic tree of ~600 mitochondrial genomes, applying phylogenetic diversity (PD) and metrics of community phylogenetics to national barcode sets to test for sampling completeness at clade level and reveal the global structure of species diversity.ResultsThe database included 73342 barcodes, grouped into 5310 BINs (species proxies) from 101 countries. Costa Rica contributed nearly half of all barcode sequences, while nearly 50 countries were represented by less than ten barcodes. Only five countries, Costa Rica, Canada, South Africa, Germany, and Spain, had a high sampling completeness, although collectively the barcode database covers most major taxonomic and biogeographically confined lineages. PD showed moderate saturation as more species diversity is added in a country, and community phylogenetics indicated clustering of national faunas. However, at the species level the inventory remained incomplete even in the most intensely sampled countries, and the sampling was insufficient for assessment of global species richness patterns.DiscussionThe sequence-based inventory in Chrysomelidae needs to be greatly expanded to include more areas and deeper local sampling before reaching a knowledge base similar to the existing Linnaean taxonomy. However, placing the barcodes into a backbone phylogenetic tree from mitochondrial genomes, a taxonomically and biogeographically highly structured pattern of global diversity emerges into which all species can be integrated via their barcodes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1305898\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1305898","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言昆虫的 DNA 条形码研究进展迅速,其最终目标是编制一份完整的世界物种目录。然而,迄今为止的条形码工作都是由几个国家的活动推动的,世界上大部分地区都没有样本。本研究以叶甲科 Chrysomelidae 为例,调查了当前条形码数据对全球物种多样性的覆盖程度。方法使用条形码与 BIN 的比率和采样覆盖率(SC)指标对最新版本(2023 年 6 月)的生命条形码数据库进行采样完整性测试。将所有条形码放入约 600 个线粒体基因组的系统发生树中,将系统发生多样性(PD)和群落系统发生学指标应用于国家条形码集,以测试支系水平的取样完整性,并揭示物种多样性的全球结构。哥斯达黎加的条形码序列占所有条形码序列的近一半,而近 50 个国家的条形码序列不足 10 个。只有五个国家(哥斯达黎加、加拿大、南非、德国和西班牙)的采样完整性较高,尽管总的来说,条形码数据库涵盖了大多数主要的分类学和生物地理学上的限制系。随着一个国家物种多样性的增加,条形码数据库显示出适度的饱和度,群落系统发生学显示出国家动物群的聚类。然而,即使在采样最密集的国家,物种水平的清单仍然不完整,采样也不足以评估全球物种丰富度模式。然而,将条形码放入线粒体基因组的主干系统发生树中,就会出现一个在分类学和生物地理学上高度结构化的全球多样性模式,所有物种都可以通过条形码整合到该模式中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The geographic and phylogenetic structure of public DNA barcode databases: an assessment using Chrysomelidae (leaf beetles)
IntroductionDNA barcoding in insects has progressed rapidly, with the ultimate goal of a complete inventory of the world’s species. However, the barcoding effort to date has been driven by a few national campaigns and leaves much of the world unsampled. This study investigates to what degree the current barcode data cover the species diversity across the globe, using the leaf beetle family Chrysomelidae as an example.MethodsA recent version (June 2023) of the Barcode-of-Life database was subjected to test of sampling completeness using the barcode-to-BIN ratio and sampling coverage (SC) metric. All barcodes were placed in a phylogenetic tree of ~600 mitochondrial genomes, applying phylogenetic diversity (PD) and metrics of community phylogenetics to national barcode sets to test for sampling completeness at clade level and reveal the global structure of species diversity.ResultsThe database included 73342 barcodes, grouped into 5310 BINs (species proxies) from 101 countries. Costa Rica contributed nearly half of all barcode sequences, while nearly 50 countries were represented by less than ten barcodes. Only five countries, Costa Rica, Canada, South Africa, Germany, and Spain, had a high sampling completeness, although collectively the barcode database covers most major taxonomic and biogeographically confined lineages. PD showed moderate saturation as more species diversity is added in a country, and community phylogenetics indicated clustering of national faunas. However, at the species level the inventory remained incomplete even in the most intensely sampled countries, and the sampling was insufficient for assessment of global species richness patterns.DiscussionThe sequence-based inventory in Chrysomelidae needs to be greatly expanded to include more areas and deeper local sampling before reaching a knowledge base similar to the existing Linnaean taxonomy. However, placing the barcodes into a backbone phylogenetic tree from mitochondrial genomes, a taxonomically and biogeographically highly structured pattern of global diversity emerges into which all species can be integrated via their barcodes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1143
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across fundamental and applied sciences, to provide ecological and evolutionary insights into our natural and anthropogenic world, and how it should best be managed. Field Chief Editor Mark A. Elgar at the University of Melbourne is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics and the public worldwide. Eminent biologist and theist Theodosius Dobzhansky’s astute observation that “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution” has arguably even broader relevance now than when it was first penned in The American Biology Teacher in 1973. One could similarly argue that not much in evolution makes sense without recourse to ecological concepts: understanding diversity — from microbial adaptations to species assemblages — requires insights from both ecological and evolutionary disciplines. Nowadays, technological developments from other fields allow us to address unprecedented ecological and evolutionary questions of astonishing detail, impressive breadth and compelling inference. The specialty sections of Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution will publish, under a single platform, contemporary, rigorous research, reviews, opinions, and commentaries that cover the spectrum of ecological and evolutionary inquiry, both fundamental and applied. Articles are peer-reviewed according to the Frontiers review guidelines, which evaluate manuscripts on objective editorial criteria. Through this unique, Frontiers platform for open-access publishing and research networking, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution aims to provide colleagues and the broader community with ecological and evolutionary insights into our natural and anthropogenic world, and how it might best be managed.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of mangrove structures and biomass on islands along the Java Sea: a case study on Bawean Islands and Karimunjawa Islands Amphibian diversity across an urban gradient in southern South America Seasonal somatic reserves of a northern ungulate influenced by reproduction and a fire-mediated landscape Assessment of microphytobenthos communities in the Kinzig catchment using photosynthesis-related traits, digital light microscopy and 18S-V9 amplicon sequencing Comprehensive survey of Early to Middle Triassic Gondwanan floras reveals under-representation of plant–arthropod interactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1