眼内透镜功率计算公式常数优化简化策略的性能

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Acta Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1111/aos.16692
Achim Langenbucher, Jascha Wendelstein, Nóra Szentmáry, Alan Cayless, Peter Hoffmann, Guillaume Debellmaniere, Damien Gatinel
{"title":"眼内透镜功率计算公式常数优化简化策略的性能","authors":"Achim Langenbucher, Jascha Wendelstein, Nóra Szentmáry, Alan Cayless, Peter Hoffmann, Guillaume Debellmaniere, Damien Gatinel","doi":"10.1111/aos.16692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeTo investigate the performance of a simple prediction scheme for the formula constants optimised for a mean refractive prediction error.MethodsAnalysis based on a dataset of 888 eyes before and after cataract surgery with IOL implantation (Hoya Vivinex). IOLMaster 700 biometric data, power of the implanted lens and postoperative spherical equivalent refraction were used to calculate the optimised constants (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> for SRKT, HofferQ, Holladay and Haigis formula with an iterative nonlinear optimisation. For detuning start values by ±1.5 from (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>, the predicted formula constants (.)<jats:sub>pred</jats:sub> were calculated and compared with (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>. Formula performance metrics mean (MPE), median (MEDPE), mean absolute (MAPE), median absolute (MEDAPE), root mean squared (RMSPE) and standard deviation (SDPE) of the formula prediction error were analysed for (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> and (.)<jats:sub>pred</jats:sub>.Results(.)<jats:sub>pred</jats:sub> – (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> showed a 2nd order parabolic behaviour with maximal deviations up to 0.09 at the tails of detuning and a minimal deviation up to −0.01 for all formulae. The performance curves of different metrics of PE as functions of detuning variations show that the formula constants for zeroing MPE and MEDPE yield almost identical formula constants, optimisation for MAPE, MEDAPE and RMSPE yielded formula constants very close to (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>, and optimisation for SDPE could result in formula constants up to 0.5 off (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> which is unacceptable for clinical use.ConclusionThis simple prediction scheme for formula constant optimisation for zero mean refraction error performs excellently in our monocentric dataset, even for larger deviations of the start value from (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>. Further studies with multicentric data and larger sample sizes are required to investigate the performance in a clinical setting further.","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of a simplified strategy for formula constant optimisation in intraocular lens power calculation\",\"authors\":\"Achim Langenbucher, Jascha Wendelstein, Nóra Szentmáry, Alan Cayless, Peter Hoffmann, Guillaume Debellmaniere, Damien Gatinel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aos.16692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeTo investigate the performance of a simple prediction scheme for the formula constants optimised for a mean refractive prediction error.MethodsAnalysis based on a dataset of 888 eyes before and after cataract surgery with IOL implantation (Hoya Vivinex). IOLMaster 700 biometric data, power of the implanted lens and postoperative spherical equivalent refraction were used to calculate the optimised constants (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> for SRKT, HofferQ, Holladay and Haigis formula with an iterative nonlinear optimisation. For detuning start values by ±1.5 from (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>, the predicted formula constants (.)<jats:sub>pred</jats:sub> were calculated and compared with (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>. Formula performance metrics mean (MPE), median (MEDPE), mean absolute (MAPE), median absolute (MEDAPE), root mean squared (RMSPE) and standard deviation (SDPE) of the formula prediction error were analysed for (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> and (.)<jats:sub>pred</jats:sub>.Results(.)<jats:sub>pred</jats:sub> – (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> showed a 2nd order parabolic behaviour with maximal deviations up to 0.09 at the tails of detuning and a minimal deviation up to −0.01 for all formulae. The performance curves of different metrics of PE as functions of detuning variations show that the formula constants for zeroing MPE and MEDPE yield almost identical formula constants, optimisation for MAPE, MEDAPE and RMSPE yielded formula constants very close to (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>, and optimisation for SDPE could result in formula constants up to 0.5 off (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub> which is unacceptable for clinical use.ConclusionThis simple prediction scheme for formula constant optimisation for zero mean refraction error performs excellently in our monocentric dataset, even for larger deviations of the start value from (.)<jats:sub>opt</jats:sub>. Further studies with multicentric data and larger sample sizes are required to investigate the performance in a clinical setting further.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16692\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16692","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究针对平均屈光预测误差优化公式常数的简单预测方案的性能。方法根据白内障手术前后植入人工晶体(Hoya Vivinex)的 888 只眼睛的数据集进行分析。使用 IOLMaster 700 生物测量数据、植入晶状体的功率和术后球面等效屈光度计算 SRKT、HofferQ、Holladay 和 Haigis 公式的优化常数(.),并进行迭代非线性优化。当起始值与(.)opt 值相差±1.5 时,计算出预测的公式常数(.)pred),并与(.)opt 值进行比较。分析了 (.)opt 和 (.)pred 的公式预测误差的公式性能指标平均值 (MPE)、中位数 (MEDPE)、平均绝对值 (MAPE)、中位数绝对值 (MEDAPE)、均方根 (RMSPE) 和标准偏差 (SDPE)。结果 (.)pred - (.)opt 显示了二阶抛物线行为,在失谐尾部最大偏差达 0.09,所有公式的最小偏差达 -0.01。PE 不同指标的性能曲线与解谐变化的函数关系表明,归零 MPE 和 MEDPE 的公式常数几乎相同,优化 MAPE、MEDAPE 和 RMSPE 得到的公式常数非常接近(.(.)opt,而对 SDPE 的优化可能会导致公式常数偏离 (.)opt 达 0.5,这对于临床使用来说是不可接受的。结论这种针对零平均屈光误差的公式常数优化的简单预测方案在我们的单中心数据集中表现出色,即使起始值与 (.)opt 的偏差较大。要进一步研究该方案在临床环境中的表现,还需要进行多中心数据和更大样本量的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of a simplified strategy for formula constant optimisation in intraocular lens power calculation
PurposeTo investigate the performance of a simple prediction scheme for the formula constants optimised for a mean refractive prediction error.MethodsAnalysis based on a dataset of 888 eyes before and after cataract surgery with IOL implantation (Hoya Vivinex). IOLMaster 700 biometric data, power of the implanted lens and postoperative spherical equivalent refraction were used to calculate the optimised constants (.)opt for SRKT, HofferQ, Holladay and Haigis formula with an iterative nonlinear optimisation. For detuning start values by ±1.5 from (.)opt, the predicted formula constants (.)pred were calculated and compared with (.)opt. Formula performance metrics mean (MPE), median (MEDPE), mean absolute (MAPE), median absolute (MEDAPE), root mean squared (RMSPE) and standard deviation (SDPE) of the formula prediction error were analysed for (.)opt and (.)pred.Results(.)pred – (.)opt showed a 2nd order parabolic behaviour with maximal deviations up to 0.09 at the tails of detuning and a minimal deviation up to −0.01 for all formulae. The performance curves of different metrics of PE as functions of detuning variations show that the formula constants for zeroing MPE and MEDPE yield almost identical formula constants, optimisation for MAPE, MEDAPE and RMSPE yielded formula constants very close to (.)opt, and optimisation for SDPE could result in formula constants up to 0.5 off (.)opt which is unacceptable for clinical use.ConclusionThis simple prediction scheme for formula constant optimisation for zero mean refraction error performs excellently in our monocentric dataset, even for larger deviations of the start value from (.)opt. Further studies with multicentric data and larger sample sizes are required to investigate the performance in a clinical setting further.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of intravitreal faricimab therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The ever ongoing cosmetic quest to change eye colour. Slowing myopia progression with cylindrical annular refractive elements (CARE) spectacle lenses-Year 1 results from a 2-year prospective, multi-centre trial. Correlation of retinal fluid and photoreceptor and RPE loss in neovascular AMD by automated quantification, a real-world FRB! analysis. Incidence, risk factors, and patient characteristics in severe contact lens-related microbial keratitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1