劳动力市场动态在影响全球女性劳动力参与中的作用

IF 1.9 Q2 ECONOMICS JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1108/jes-11-2023-0633
Tanaya Saha, Prakash Singh
{"title":"劳动力市场动态在影响全球女性劳动力参与中的作用","authors":"Tanaya Saha, Prakash Singh","doi":"10.1108/jes-11-2023-0633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The global non-attainment of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 5 indicates the issue of rising gender inequality. Educated women shying away from the labor force is worsening it. The labor market dynamics might shape the female labor force participation (FLFP). The present study recommends a policy framework by analyzing this dynamism across 125 countries over 1990–2020.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The Two-step System Generalized Method of Moments is used to address endogeneity bias. Dynamism in policy environment is captured by relaxing the Ceteris Paribus condition in the empirical model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Results show that the moderation of labor market factors has increased with the attainment of Secondary and Tertiary Education. Results also highlight that these factors promote FLFP through prospective opportunities but also hinder female participation through employer’s discrimination despite educational attainment.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Studies have examined the role of education on FLFP. However, prior research has not investigated the role of labor market factors in influencing the impact of education on FLFP. The consideration of these factors will help in addressing the global policy lacuna by recommending a policy framework for enhancing FLFP through internalization of the externalities exerted by the labor market factors, and thereby, help the countries attaining the SDG 5 objectives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47604,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of labor market dynamics in influencing global female labor force participation\",\"authors\":\"Tanaya Saha, Prakash Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jes-11-2023-0633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The global non-attainment of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 5 indicates the issue of rising gender inequality. Educated women shying away from the labor force is worsening it. The labor market dynamics might shape the female labor force participation (FLFP). The present study recommends a policy framework by analyzing this dynamism across 125 countries over 1990–2020.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The Two-step System Generalized Method of Moments is used to address endogeneity bias. Dynamism in policy environment is captured by relaxing the Ceteris Paribus condition in the empirical model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Results show that the moderation of labor market factors has increased with the attainment of Secondary and Tertiary Education. Results also highlight that these factors promote FLFP through prospective opportunities but also hinder female participation through employer’s discrimination despite educational attainment.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Studies have examined the role of education on FLFP. However, prior research has not investigated the role of labor market factors in influencing the impact of education on FLFP. The consideration of these factors will help in addressing the global policy lacuna by recommending a policy framework for enhancing FLFP through internalization of the externalities exerted by the labor market factors, and thereby, help the countries attaining the SDG 5 objectives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-11-2023-0633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-11-2023-0633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 全球未实现可持续发展目标(SDG)5 表明性别不平等问题日益严重。受过教育的女性不愿加入劳动力大军的现象正在加剧。劳动力市场动态可能会影响女性劳动力参与率(FLFP)。本研究通过分析 1990-2020 年间 125 个国家的这种动态变化,提出了政策框架建议。结果结果表明,劳动力市场因素的调节作用随着中等教育和高等教育水平的提高而增强。结果还凸显出,这些因素通过前瞻性机会促进了 FLFP,但同时也通过雇主对女性的歧视阻碍了女性的参与,尽管她们的教育程度很高。然而,之前的研究并未调查劳动力市场因素在影响教育对 FLFP 的影响方面所起的作用。对这些因素的考虑将有助于解决全球政策空白问题,通过建议一个政策框架,将劳动力市场因素产生的外部效应内部化,从而提高家庭劳动生产率,帮助各国实现可持续发展目标 5 的各项目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of labor market dynamics in influencing global female labor force participation

Purpose

The global non-attainment of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 5 indicates the issue of rising gender inequality. Educated women shying away from the labor force is worsening it. The labor market dynamics might shape the female labor force participation (FLFP). The present study recommends a policy framework by analyzing this dynamism across 125 countries over 1990–2020.

Design/methodology/approach

The Two-step System Generalized Method of Moments is used to address endogeneity bias. Dynamism in policy environment is captured by relaxing the Ceteris Paribus condition in the empirical model.

Findings

Results show that the moderation of labor market factors has increased with the attainment of Secondary and Tertiary Education. Results also highlight that these factors promote FLFP through prospective opportunities but also hinder female participation through employer’s discrimination despite educational attainment.

Originality/value

Studies have examined the role of education on FLFP. However, prior research has not investigated the role of labor market factors in influencing the impact of education on FLFP. The consideration of these factors will help in addressing the global policy lacuna by recommending a policy framework for enhancing FLFP through internalization of the externalities exerted by the labor market factors, and thereby, help the countries attaining the SDG 5 objectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Studies publishes high quality research findings and commentary on international developments in economics. The journal maintains a sound balance between economic theory and application at both the micro and the macro levels. Articles on economic issues between individual nations, emerging and evolving trading blocs are particularly welcomed. Contributors are encouraged to spell out the practical implications of their work for economists in government and industry
期刊最新文献
The impact of COVID on the rate of return to schooling among US industries Analyzing the ICT and economic growth relation in OECD countries Students’ performance and faculty efficiency. Assessing the role of gender through a metafrontier An empirical analysis of climate transition: a global outlook of agriculture productivity Is monopoly truly effective for producers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1