Nan Dai, Saif Ullah, Jingwen Zhang, Xiaoyu Wan, Shanshan Zhu, Ping Liu, Changqing Guo, Xinguang Cao
{"title":"圈套牵引辅助内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗环形浅表食管癌的有效性和安全性","authors":"Nan Dai, Saif Ullah, Jingwen Zhang, Xiaoyu Wan, Shanshan Zhu, Ping Liu, Changqing Guo, Xinguang Cao","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10859-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of snare traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the management of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A total of 68 patients who underwent ESD for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer were included in this study. All the patients were divided into two groups based on whether the snare traction was used or not; the snare traction group (S-ESD, group <i>n</i> = 35) and the control group (C-ESD, group <i>n</i> = 33).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>There was no significant difference in the size of the resected area between the groups [21.98 (18.30, 27.00) cm<sup>2</sup> vs 24.00 (15.28, 30.72) cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> = 0.976]. The snare traction group had a shorter dissection time [92.00 (74.00, 121.00) min vs 110.00 (92.50, 137.00) min, <i>P</i> = 0.017] and a faster resection speed [0.28 ± 0.13 cm<sup>2</sup>/min vs 0.22 ± 0.11cm<sup>2</sup>/min, <i>P</i> = 0.040] compared to the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, cost, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, curative resection rate, bleeding rate, perforation rate, stricture rate, and recurrence rate (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Snare traction-assisted ESD is a safe and efficient approach for the treatment of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer. Its advantages includes shorter procedure so the anesthesia requirement, clear operative filed view, improved mucosal dissection efficiency, simple, and easily accessible equipment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy and safety of snare traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer\",\"authors\":\"Nan Dai, Saif Ullah, Jingwen Zhang, Xiaoyu Wan, Shanshan Zhu, Ping Liu, Changqing Guo, Xinguang Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-024-10859-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objective</h3><p>This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of snare traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the management of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>A total of 68 patients who underwent ESD for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer were included in this study. All the patients were divided into two groups based on whether the snare traction was used or not; the snare traction group (S-ESD, group <i>n</i> = 35) and the control group (C-ESD, group <i>n</i> = 33).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>There was no significant difference in the size of the resected area between the groups [21.98 (18.30, 27.00) cm<sup>2</sup> vs 24.00 (15.28, 30.72) cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> = 0.976]. The snare traction group had a shorter dissection time [92.00 (74.00, 121.00) min vs 110.00 (92.50, 137.00) min, <i>P</i> = 0.017] and a faster resection speed [0.28 ± 0.13 cm<sup>2</sup>/min vs 0.22 ± 0.11cm<sup>2</sup>/min, <i>P</i> = 0.040] compared to the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, cost, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, curative resection rate, bleeding rate, perforation rate, stricture rate, and recurrence rate (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Snare traction-assisted ESD is a safe and efficient approach for the treatment of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer. Its advantages includes shorter procedure so the anesthesia requirement, clear operative filed view, improved mucosal dissection efficiency, simple, and easily accessible equipment.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical abstract</h3>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":501625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10859-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10859-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
方法:本研究共纳入了68例接受ESD治疗的环形浅表食管癌患者。结果两组患者的切除面积无显著差异[21.98 (18.30, 27.00) cm2 vs 24.00 (15.28, 30.72) cm2, P = 0.976]。与对照组相比,卡环牵引组的解剖时间更短 [92.00 (74.00, 121.00) min vs 110.00 (92.50, 137.00) min, P = 0.017],切除速度更快 [0.28 ± 0.13 cm2/min vs 0.22 ± 0.11 cm2/min, P = 0.040]。两组在住院时间、费用、全切除率、R0切除率、根治切除率、出血率、穿孔率、狭窄率和复发率方面差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。其优点是手术时间短,麻醉要求低,手术切口视野清晰,提高了粘膜剥离效率,设备简单且易于获得。
The efficacy and safety of snare traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer
Objective
This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of snare traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the management of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer.
Methods
A total of 68 patients who underwent ESD for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer were included in this study. All the patients were divided into two groups based on whether the snare traction was used or not; the snare traction group (S-ESD, group n = 35) and the control group (C-ESD, group n = 33).
Results
There was no significant difference in the size of the resected area between the groups [21.98 (18.30, 27.00) cm2 vs 24.00 (15.28, 30.72) cm2, P = 0.976]. The snare traction group had a shorter dissection time [92.00 (74.00, 121.00) min vs 110.00 (92.50, 137.00) min, P = 0.017] and a faster resection speed [0.28 ± 0.13 cm2/min vs 0.22 ± 0.11cm2/min, P = 0.040] compared to the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, cost, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, curative resection rate, bleeding rate, perforation rate, stricture rate, and recurrence rate (P > 0.05).
Conclusion
Snare traction-assisted ESD is a safe and efficient approach for the treatment of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer. Its advantages includes shorter procedure so the anesthesia requirement, clear operative filed view, improved mucosal dissection efficiency, simple, and easily accessible equipment.