在线教育工具 "脑电图路线图 "显著提高了学员识别脑电图模式的能力

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epileptic Disorders Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1002/epd2.20227
Irfan S. Sheikh, Roohi Katyal, Aris Hadjinicolaou, Bo Martin Bibby, Marcia Olandoski, Fábio A. Nascimento, Sandor Beniczky
{"title":"在线教育工具 \"脑电图路线图 \"显著提高了学员识别脑电图模式的能力","authors":"Irfan S. Sheikh,&nbsp;Roohi Katyal,&nbsp;Aris Hadjinicolaou,&nbsp;Bo Martin Bibby,&nbsp;Marcia Olandoski,&nbsp;Fábio A. Nascimento,&nbsp;Sandor Beniczky","doi":"10.1002/epd2.20227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We created a framework to assess the competency-based EEG curriculum, outlined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) through a video-based online educational resource (“Roadmap to EEGs”) and assessed its effectiveness and feasibility in improving trainees' knowledge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ten video-based e-learning modules addressed seven key topics in EEG and epileptology (normal EEG, normal variants, EEG artifacts, interictal epileptiform discharges (IED), focal seizures, idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), and developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE)). We posted the educational videos on YouTube for free access. Pre- and post-tests, each comprising 20 multiple-choice questions, were distributed to institution leadership and advertised on social media platforms to reach a global audience. The tests were administered online to assess the participants' knowledge. Pre- and post-test questions showed different EEG samples to avoid memorization and immediate recall. After completing the post-test, participants were asked to respond to 7 additional questions assessing their confidence levels and recommendations for improvement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 52 complete and matched pre- and post-test responses were collected. The probability of a correct response was 73% before teaching (95% CI: 70%–77%) and 81% after teaching (95% CI: 78%–84%). The odds of a correct response increased significantly by 59% (95% CI: 28%–98%, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). For participants having &gt;4 weeks of EEG training, the probability of a correct response was 76% (95% CI: .72–.79) and 81% after teaching (95% CI: .78–.84). The odds of answering correctly increased by 44% (95% CI: 15%–80%, <i>p</i> = .001). Participants felt completely confident in independently interpreting and identifying EEG findings after completing the teaching modules (17.1% before vs. 37.8% after, <i>p</i>-value &lt; .0001). 86.5% of participants expressed a high likelihood of recommending the module to other trainees.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>The video-based online educational resource allows participants to acquire foundational knowledge in EEG/epilepsy, and participants to review previously learned EEG/epilepsy information.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50508,"journal":{"name":"Epileptic Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epd2.20227","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The online educational tool “Roadmap to EEGs” significantly improved trainee performance in recognizing EEG patterns\",\"authors\":\"Irfan S. Sheikh,&nbsp;Roohi Katyal,&nbsp;Aris Hadjinicolaou,&nbsp;Bo Martin Bibby,&nbsp;Marcia Olandoski,&nbsp;Fábio A. Nascimento,&nbsp;Sandor Beniczky\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/epd2.20227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>We created a framework to assess the competency-based EEG curriculum, outlined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) through a video-based online educational resource (“Roadmap to EEGs”) and assessed its effectiveness and feasibility in improving trainees' knowledge.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ten video-based e-learning modules addressed seven key topics in EEG and epileptology (normal EEG, normal variants, EEG artifacts, interictal epileptiform discharges (IED), focal seizures, idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), and developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE)). We posted the educational videos on YouTube for free access. Pre- and post-tests, each comprising 20 multiple-choice questions, were distributed to institution leadership and advertised on social media platforms to reach a global audience. The tests were administered online to assess the participants' knowledge. Pre- and post-test questions showed different EEG samples to avoid memorization and immediate recall. After completing the post-test, participants were asked to respond to 7 additional questions assessing their confidence levels and recommendations for improvement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 52 complete and matched pre- and post-test responses were collected. The probability of a correct response was 73% before teaching (95% CI: 70%–77%) and 81% after teaching (95% CI: 78%–84%). The odds of a correct response increased significantly by 59% (95% CI: 28%–98%, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). For participants having &gt;4 weeks of EEG training, the probability of a correct response was 76% (95% CI: .72–.79) and 81% after teaching (95% CI: .78–.84). The odds of answering correctly increased by 44% (95% CI: 15%–80%, <i>p</i> = .001). Participants felt completely confident in independently interpreting and identifying EEG findings after completing the teaching modules (17.1% before vs. 37.8% after, <i>p</i>-value &lt; .0001). 86.5% of participants expressed a high likelihood of recommending the module to other trainees.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>The video-based online educational resource allows participants to acquire foundational knowledge in EEG/epilepsy, and participants to review previously learned EEG/epilepsy information.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epileptic Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epd2.20227\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epileptic Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epd2.20227\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epileptic Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epd2.20227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们创建了一个框架,通过基于视频的在线教育资源("脑电图路线图")评估国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)概述的基于能力的脑电图课程,并评估其在提高学员知识方面的有效性和可行性。方法十个基于视频的电子学习模块涉及脑电图和癫痫学的七个关键主题(正常脑电图、正常变异、脑电图伪像、发作间期痫样放电 (IED)、局灶性癫痫发作、特发性全身性癫痫 (IGE),以及发育性和癫痫性脑病 (DEE))。我们在 YouTube 上发布了教育视频,供免费观看。我们向机构领导分发了前测和后测试卷,每份试卷包括 20 道选择题,并在社交媒体平台上发布广告,以覆盖全球受众。测试在网上进行,以评估参与者的知识水平。测试前和测试后的问题显示了不同的脑电图样本,以避免记忆和立即回忆。完成后测后,参与者还需回答 7 个额外的问题,以评估他们的信心水平和改进建议。教学前正确回答的概率为 73%(95% CI:70%-77%),教学后为 81%(95% CI:78%-84%)。正确回答的概率显著增加了 59% (95% CI: 28%-98%, p <.001)。对于接受过>4周脑电训练的参与者来说,正确回答的概率为76%(95% CI:.72-.79),而教学后为81%(95% CI:.78-.84)。回答正确的概率增加了 44% (95% CI: 15%-80%, p = .001)。在完成教学模块后,参与者对独立解释和识别脑电图结果完全有信心(教学前为 17.1%,教学后为 37.8%,P 值为 0.0001)。86.5%的学员表示很有可能向其他学员推荐该模块。重要意义基于视频的在线教育资源使学员能够获得脑电图/癫痫的基础知识,并使学员能够复习以前学过的脑电图/癫痫信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The online educational tool “Roadmap to EEGs” significantly improved trainee performance in recognizing EEG patterns

Objective

We created a framework to assess the competency-based EEG curriculum, outlined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) through a video-based online educational resource (“Roadmap to EEGs”) and assessed its effectiveness and feasibility in improving trainees' knowledge.

Methods

Ten video-based e-learning modules addressed seven key topics in EEG and epileptology (normal EEG, normal variants, EEG artifacts, interictal epileptiform discharges (IED), focal seizures, idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), and developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE)). We posted the educational videos on YouTube for free access. Pre- and post-tests, each comprising 20 multiple-choice questions, were distributed to institution leadership and advertised on social media platforms to reach a global audience. The tests were administered online to assess the participants' knowledge. Pre- and post-test questions showed different EEG samples to avoid memorization and immediate recall. After completing the post-test, participants were asked to respond to 7 additional questions assessing their confidence levels and recommendations for improvement.

Results

A total of 52 complete and matched pre- and post-test responses were collected. The probability of a correct response was 73% before teaching (95% CI: 70%–77%) and 81% after teaching (95% CI: 78%–84%). The odds of a correct response increased significantly by 59% (95% CI: 28%–98%, p < .001). For participants having >4 weeks of EEG training, the probability of a correct response was 76% (95% CI: .72–.79) and 81% after teaching (95% CI: .78–.84). The odds of answering correctly increased by 44% (95% CI: 15%–80%, p = .001). Participants felt completely confident in independently interpreting and identifying EEG findings after completing the teaching modules (17.1% before vs. 37.8% after, p-value < .0001). 86.5% of participants expressed a high likelihood of recommending the module to other trainees.

Significance

The video-based online educational resource allows participants to acquire foundational knowledge in EEG/epilepsy, and participants to review previously learned EEG/epilepsy information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epileptic Disorders
Epileptic Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
138
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epileptic Disorders is the leading forum where all experts and medical studentswho wish to improve their understanding of epilepsy and related disorders can share practical experiences surrounding diagnosis and care, natural history, and management of seizures. Epileptic Disorders is the official E-journal of the International League Against Epilepsy for educational communication. As the journal celebrates its 20th anniversary, it will now be available only as an online version. Its mission is to create educational links between epileptologists and other health professionals in clinical practice and scientists or physicians in research-based institutions. This change is accompanied by an increase in the number of issues per year, from 4 to 6, to ensure regular diffusion of recently published material (high quality Review and Seminar in Epileptology papers; Original Research articles or Case reports of educational value; MultiMedia Teaching Material), to serve the global medical community that cares for those affected by epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Sleep-related hypermotor seizures originating from the occipital lobe. Electrographic status epilepticus or encephalopathy in baclofen intoxication? Characteristics of motion signal profiles of tonic-clonic, tonic, hyperkinetic, and motor seizures extracted from nocturnal video recordings. The role of genetic testing in adult patients with unexplained epilepsy. Methohexital‐induced seizure during Wada test: A case report and alternative evaluation with etomidate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1