在治疗心房颤动的消融手术中识别肺静脉隔离的机器学习算法的验证:PVISION研究结果

J De Pooter, L Timmers, S Boveda, S Combes, S Knecht, A Almorad, C De Asmundis, M Duytschaever
{"title":"在治疗心房颤动的消融手术中识别肺静脉隔离的机器学习算法的验证:PVISION研究结果","authors":"J De Pooter, L Timmers, S Boveda, S Combes, S Knecht, A Almorad, C De Asmundis, M Duytschaever","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of ablation for atrial fibrillation. Confirmation of PVI can be challenging due to far field electrograms and sometimes requires additional pacing maneuvers or mapping. This prospective multicenter study assessed the agreement between a previously trained automated algorithm designed to determine vein isolation status with expert opinion in real-world clinical setting. Method Consecutive patients scheduled for PVI were recruited at four centers. The ECGenius electrophysiology recording system (CathVision ApS, Denmark) was connected in parallel with the lab’s existing system. Electrograms from a circular mapping catheter were annotated during sinus rhythm at baseline pre-ablation, time of isolation, and post-ablation. The ground truth for isolation status was based on operator opinion. The algorithm was applied to the collected PV signals off-line and compared to expert opinion. The primary endpoint was a sensitivity and specificity exceeding 80%. Results Overall, 498 electrograms (248 at baseline and 250 at PVI) with 5,473 individual PV beats from 89 patients (32 females, 62 ±12 years) were analyzed. The algorithm performance reached an area under curve (AUC) of 92% and met the primary study endpoint with a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 87%, respectively (p = 0.005; p = 0.004). The algorithm had an accuracy of 87% in classifying the time of isolation. Conclusion This study validated an automated algorithm using machine learning (ML) to assess the isolation status of pulmonary veins in patients undergoing PVI with different ablation modalities. The algorithm reached an AUC of 92% with both sensitivity and specificity exceeding the primary study endpoints.","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm to Identify Pulmonary Vein Isolation during Ablation Procedures for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the PVISION Study\",\"authors\":\"J De Pooter, L Timmers, S Boveda, S Combes, S Knecht, A Almorad, C De Asmundis, M Duytschaever\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euae116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aims Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of ablation for atrial fibrillation. Confirmation of PVI can be challenging due to far field electrograms and sometimes requires additional pacing maneuvers or mapping. This prospective multicenter study assessed the agreement between a previously trained automated algorithm designed to determine vein isolation status with expert opinion in real-world clinical setting. Method Consecutive patients scheduled for PVI were recruited at four centers. The ECGenius electrophysiology recording system (CathVision ApS, Denmark) was connected in parallel with the lab’s existing system. Electrograms from a circular mapping catheter were annotated during sinus rhythm at baseline pre-ablation, time of isolation, and post-ablation. The ground truth for isolation status was based on operator opinion. The algorithm was applied to the collected PV signals off-line and compared to expert opinion. The primary endpoint was a sensitivity and specificity exceeding 80%. Results Overall, 498 electrograms (248 at baseline and 250 at PVI) with 5,473 individual PV beats from 89 patients (32 females, 62 ±12 years) were analyzed. The algorithm performance reached an area under curve (AUC) of 92% and met the primary study endpoint with a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 87%, respectively (p = 0.005; p = 0.004). The algorithm had an accuracy of 87% in classifying the time of isolation. Conclusion This study validated an automated algorithm using machine learning (ML) to assess the isolation status of pulmonary veins in patients undergoing PVI with different ablation modalities. The algorithm reached an AUC of 92% with both sensitivity and specificity exceeding the primary study endpoints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EP Europace\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EP Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的 肺静脉隔离术(PVI)是心房颤动消融术的基础。由于远场电图的存在,确认肺静脉隔离可能具有挑战性,有时需要额外的起搏操作或绘图。这项前瞻性多中心研究评估了在真实临床环境中,旨在确定静脉隔离状态的先前训练有素的自动算法与专家意见之间的一致性。方法 在四个中心连续招募计划进行 PVI 的患者。ECGenius 电生理学记录系统(CathVision ApS,丹麦)与实验室现有系统并行连接。在基线消融前、隔离时和消融后的窦性心律期间,对来自圆形映射导管的电图进行注释。隔离状态的基本事实基于操作者的意见。该算法应用于离线收集的 PV 信号,并与专家意见进行比较。主要终点是灵敏度和特异性超过 80%。结果 共分析了 89 名患者(32 名女性,62 ± 12 岁)的 498 个电图(基线时 248 个,PVI 时 250 个)和 5473 个单个 PV 搏动。该算法的曲线下面积(AUC)达到 92%,达到了主要研究终点,灵敏度和特异度分别为 86% 和 87% (p = 0.005; p = 0.004)。该算法对隔离时间分类的准确率为 87%。结论 本研究验证了一种使用机器学习(ML)评估采用不同消融方式进行 PVI 患者肺静脉隔离状态的自动算法。该算法的 AUC 达到 92%,灵敏度和特异性均超过了主要研究终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm to Identify Pulmonary Vein Isolation during Ablation Procedures for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the PVISION Study
Background and Aims Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of ablation for atrial fibrillation. Confirmation of PVI can be challenging due to far field electrograms and sometimes requires additional pacing maneuvers or mapping. This prospective multicenter study assessed the agreement between a previously trained automated algorithm designed to determine vein isolation status with expert opinion in real-world clinical setting. Method Consecutive patients scheduled for PVI were recruited at four centers. The ECGenius electrophysiology recording system (CathVision ApS, Denmark) was connected in parallel with the lab’s existing system. Electrograms from a circular mapping catheter were annotated during sinus rhythm at baseline pre-ablation, time of isolation, and post-ablation. The ground truth for isolation status was based on operator opinion. The algorithm was applied to the collected PV signals off-line and compared to expert opinion. The primary endpoint was a sensitivity and specificity exceeding 80%. Results Overall, 498 electrograms (248 at baseline and 250 at PVI) with 5,473 individual PV beats from 89 patients (32 females, 62 ±12 years) were analyzed. The algorithm performance reached an area under curve (AUC) of 92% and met the primary study endpoint with a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 87%, respectively (p = 0.005; p = 0.004). The algorithm had an accuracy of 87% in classifying the time of isolation. Conclusion This study validated an automated algorithm using machine learning (ML) to assess the isolation status of pulmonary veins in patients undergoing PVI with different ablation modalities. The algorithm reached an AUC of 92% with both sensitivity and specificity exceeding the primary study endpoints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High lead-related complication rate with MicroPort Vega active fixation pacing leads. Dual chamber versus single chamber pacemaker in patients in sinus rhythm with an atrioventricular block: a nationwide cohort study Ventricular Arrhythmias in Acute Heart Failure. A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care Association (ACVC), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC Enhancing Origin Prediction: Deep Learning Model for Diagnosing Premature Ventricular Contractions with Dual-Rhythm Analysis Focused on Cardiac Rotation A computational study on the influence of antegrade accessory pathway location on the 12-lead electrocardiogram in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1