分班方法对多语种学生在高等教育中取得成功的影响

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH TESOL Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1002/tesj.835
William Key
{"title":"分班方法对多语种学生在高等教育中取得成功的影响","authors":"William Key","doi":"10.1002/tesj.835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, many actors are pushing for the use of grade point average (GPA) as the main placement tool for gatekeeper math and English courses for community college students (Quarles, 2022; Scott‐Clayton, 2018; Turk, 2017). One community college system (pseudonymously, SXCC) in a New England state has begun placing students in initial math and English classes based on self‐reported GPA. There have been studies on the effects of placement changes of this type (Belfield &amp; Crosta, 2012; Hodara &amp; Cox, 2016; Ngo &amp; Kwon, 2014; Scott‐Clayton, 2012). However, studies have not included the effects of these changes on multilingual learners (MLLs).Using a census of every MLL placed in SXCC in the summer and fall of 2020 and the spring of 2021 (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 12,603), a MANOVA found that MLL students in the SXCC system who were placed using previous placement methods had a higher overall GPA than students placed using self‐reported GPA (<jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 3.32, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 0.740; <jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 2.01, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 1.27, respectively) and had higher satisfactory academic progress (SAP) (<jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 102.98, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 51.52; <jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 57.66, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 55.53, respectively), and took longer to enroll in English 101 (<jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 5.11, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 3.55; <jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 2.36, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 1.76, respectively).","PeriodicalId":51742,"journal":{"name":"TESOL Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of placement method on multilingual learner success in higher education\",\"authors\":\"William Key\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tesj.835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the United States, many actors are pushing for the use of grade point average (GPA) as the main placement tool for gatekeeper math and English courses for community college students (Quarles, 2022; Scott‐Clayton, 2018; Turk, 2017). One community college system (pseudonymously, SXCC) in a New England state has begun placing students in initial math and English classes based on self‐reported GPA. There have been studies on the effects of placement changes of this type (Belfield &amp; Crosta, 2012; Hodara &amp; Cox, 2016; Ngo &amp; Kwon, 2014; Scott‐Clayton, 2012). However, studies have not included the effects of these changes on multilingual learners (MLLs).Using a census of every MLL placed in SXCC in the summer and fall of 2020 and the spring of 2021 (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 12,603), a MANOVA found that MLL students in the SXCC system who were placed using previous placement methods had a higher overall GPA than students placed using self‐reported GPA (<jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 3.32, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 0.740; <jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 2.01, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 1.27, respectively) and had higher satisfactory academic progress (SAP) (<jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 102.98, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 51.52; <jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 57.66, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 55.53, respectively), and took longer to enroll in English 101 (<jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 5.11, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 3.55; <jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 2.36, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 1.76, respectively).\",\"PeriodicalId\":51742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TESOL Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TESOL Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TESOL Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,许多行为者都在推动将平均学分绩点(GPA)作为社区学院学生数学和英语课程的主要分班工具(Quarles,2022;Scott-Clayton,2018;Turk,2017)。新英格兰某州的一所社区学院系统(化名为 SXCC)已开始根据自我报告的 GPA 为学生安排数学和英语的初始课程。已有关于此类分班变化效果的研究(Belfield & Crosta, 2012; Hodara & Cox, 2016; Ngo & Kwon, 2014; Scott-Clayton, 2012)。通过对 2020 年夏秋季和 2021 年春季在 SXCC 就读的所有 MLL(N = 12,603)进行普查,MANOVA 发现,在 SXCC 体系中,使用以前安置方法安置的 MLL 学生的总体 GPA 比使用自我报告 GPA 安置的学生高(M = 3.32,SD = 0.740;M = 2.01,SD = 1.27),有更高的令人满意的学业进展(SAP)(分别为 M = 102.98,SD = 51.52;M = 57.66,SD = 55.53),并且注册英语 101 课程的时间更长(分别为 M = 5.11,SD = 3.55;M = 2.36,SD = 1.76)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of placement method on multilingual learner success in higher education
In the United States, many actors are pushing for the use of grade point average (GPA) as the main placement tool for gatekeeper math and English courses for community college students (Quarles, 2022; Scott‐Clayton, 2018; Turk, 2017). One community college system (pseudonymously, SXCC) in a New England state has begun placing students in initial math and English classes based on self‐reported GPA. There have been studies on the effects of placement changes of this type (Belfield & Crosta, 2012; Hodara & Cox, 2016; Ngo & Kwon, 2014; Scott‐Clayton, 2012). However, studies have not included the effects of these changes on multilingual learners (MLLs).Using a census of every MLL placed in SXCC in the summer and fall of 2020 and the spring of 2021 (N = 12,603), a MANOVA found that MLL students in the SXCC system who were placed using previous placement methods had a higher overall GPA than students placed using self‐reported GPA (M = 3.32, SD = 0.740; M = 2.01, SD = 1.27, respectively) and had higher satisfactory academic progress (SAP) (M = 102.98, SD = 51.52; M = 57.66, SD = 55.53, respectively), and took longer to enroll in English 101 (M = 5.11, SD = 3.55; M = 2.36, SD = 1.76, respectively).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TESOL Journal
TESOL Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: TESOL Journal (TJ) is a refereed, practitioner-oriented electronic journal based on current theory and research in the field of TESOL. TJ is a forum for second and foreign language educators at all levels to engage in the ways that research and theorizing can inform, shape, and ground teaching practices and perspectives. Articles enable an active and vibrant professional dialogue about research- and theory-based practices as well as practice-oriented theorizing and research.
期刊最新文献
Linguistically responsive teacher identity construction through reflections on sociocultural pedagogical practices: Collaborating with secondary content area teachers of emergent bilinguals Home–school connection framework: Elevating multilingual familial engagement capital to build bridges The (im)possible mission of language teacher educators in Germany: Identity formation, development, and practice in institutionalised settings Consumerist discourses on social media and language teacher educator identity tensions An equitable approach to leveraging multilingual paraprofessional learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1