从 n 个项目中创建平等小组:幼儿园的数学创造力

IF 3.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Studies in Mathematics Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1007/s10649-024-10322-8
Esther S. Levenson, Ruthi Barkai, Anas Mahamid, Sigal Levy
{"title":"从 n 个项目中创建平等小组:幼儿园的数学创造力","authors":"Esther S. Levenson, Ruthi Barkai, Anas Mahamid, Sigal Levy","doi":"10.1007/s10649-024-10322-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines the solutions of 34 kindergarten children as they create equal groups from <i>n</i> bottle caps, where <i>n</i> was equal to 8, 9, 22, and 23. For each <i>n</i>, children were asked to find as many different solutions as possible. The number of solutions they found, i.e., children’s fluency, as well as the strategies used to create equal groups, was analyzed. Findings indicated that for large numbers, fluency was greater for an even number of objects than for an odd number of objects. In general, most children reached only one solution. For all four tasks, most children created only two equal groups of caps, even though they could have created three groups or more. A significant association was found between tasks and a preferred strategy. While children employed between one and two strategies when working on a single task, when considering all four tasks, they generally employed between two and three strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48107,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies in Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating equal groups from n items: mathematical creativity in kindergarten\",\"authors\":\"Esther S. Levenson, Ruthi Barkai, Anas Mahamid, Sigal Levy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10649-024-10322-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study examines the solutions of 34 kindergarten children as they create equal groups from <i>n</i> bottle caps, where <i>n</i> was equal to 8, 9, 22, and 23. For each <i>n</i>, children were asked to find as many different solutions as possible. The number of solutions they found, i.e., children’s fluency, as well as the strategies used to create equal groups, was analyzed. Findings indicated that for large numbers, fluency was greater for an even number of objects than for an odd number of objects. In general, most children reached only one solution. For all four tasks, most children created only two equal groups of caps, even though they could have created three groups or more. A significant association was found between tasks and a preferred strategy. While children employed between one and two strategies when working on a single task, when considering all four tasks, they generally employed between two and three strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Studies in Mathematics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Studies in Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10322-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies in Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10322-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了 34 名幼儿园儿童用 n 个瓶盖(其中 n 分别为 8、9、22 和 23)创建相等组的解法。对于每个 n,要求儿童找到尽可能多的不同解法。我们分析了他们找到的解决方案的数量,即儿童的流畅度,以及创建等组所使用的策略。研究结果表明,对于大数字,偶数物体的流畅度要高于奇数物体。一般来说,大多数儿童只能找到一种解决方案。在所有四项任务中,大多数儿童只能将帽子分成两组,尽管他们可以将帽子分成三组或更多组。研究发现,任务与首选策略之间存在重要关联。在完成单项任务时,儿童采用的策略在一到两种之间,而在完成所有四项任务时,他们一般采用两到三种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creating equal groups from n items: mathematical creativity in kindergarten

This study examines the solutions of 34 kindergarten children as they create equal groups from n bottle caps, where n was equal to 8, 9, 22, and 23. For each n, children were asked to find as many different solutions as possible. The number of solutions they found, i.e., children’s fluency, as well as the strategies used to create equal groups, was analyzed. Findings indicated that for large numbers, fluency was greater for an even number of objects than for an odd number of objects. In general, most children reached only one solution. For all four tasks, most children created only two equal groups of caps, even though they could have created three groups or more. A significant association was found between tasks and a preferred strategy. While children employed between one and two strategies when working on a single task, when considering all four tasks, they generally employed between two and three strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Educational Studies in Mathematics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Educational Studies in Mathematics presents new ideas and developments of major importance to those working in the field of mathematics education. It seeks to reflect both the variety of research concerns within this field and the range of methods used to study them. It deals with methodological, pedagogical/didactical, political and socio-cultural aspects of teaching and learning of mathematics, rather than with specific programmes for teaching mathematics. Within this range, Educational Studies in Mathematics is open to all research approaches. The emphasis is on high-level articles which are of more than local or national interest.? All contributions to this journal are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Mathematical discussion in classrooms as a technologically-supported activity fostering participation and inclusion Becoming exceptional: the role of capital in the development and mediation of mathematics identity and degree trajectories The emergence of the analytic-structural way of thinking in linear algebra as a blended space Investigating students’ reasoning in generalization of deconstructive figural patterns “I’ll just try to mimic that”: an exploration of students’ analogical structure creation in abstract algebra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1