考后包装:批判性反思的工具

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Nursing Education Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.3928/01484834-20240417-01
Emily G. Chin, PhD, RNC, CNE, Ginger Schroers, PhD, RNC, CNE, Laura Gonzalez, PhD, Lise Hauser, DNP, RN, Olga Lazala, PhD, APRN, Yeyin Yi, DNP, APRN, AGACNP-BC
{"title":"考后包装:批判性反思的工具","authors":"Emily G. Chin, PhD, RNC, CNE, Ginger Schroers, PhD, RNC, CNE, Laura Gonzalez, PhD, Lise Hauser, DNP, RN, Olga Lazala, PhD, APRN, Yeyin Yi, DNP, APRN, AGACNP-BC","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240417-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<section><h3>Background:</h3><p>Post-exam review sessions that reveal a completed exam to students can be time-consuming and ineffective. Additionally, the review may jeopardize exam integrity by exposing the individual items.</p></section><section><h3>Method:</h3><p>To promote critical reflection, an exam wrapper, without the return of a completed exam, was implemented. Students were encouraged to take deeper ownership of learning and be active in the process of exam review.</p></section><section><h3>Results:</h3><p>Most students strongly agreed or agreed that they adjusted their study strategies based on their self-reflection (68.5%) or on the instructor feedback (66.7%) provided through the wrapper. All faculty stated the process of using wrappers was much more or more valuable and efficient, compared to prior post-exam feedback methods.</p></section><section><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>Using an exam wrapper as a stand-alone, post-exam debrief, students assume a more proactive role by reflecting on individual exam preparation and learning strategies without the return of a completed exam. <strong>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(X):XXX–XXX.]</strong></p></section>","PeriodicalId":54781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Education","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Exam Wrappers: A Tool for Critical Reflection\",\"authors\":\"Emily G. Chin, PhD, RNC, CNE, Ginger Schroers, PhD, RNC, CNE, Laura Gonzalez, PhD, Lise Hauser, DNP, RN, Olga Lazala, PhD, APRN, Yeyin Yi, DNP, APRN, AGACNP-BC\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01484834-20240417-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<section><h3>Background:</h3><p>Post-exam review sessions that reveal a completed exam to students can be time-consuming and ineffective. Additionally, the review may jeopardize exam integrity by exposing the individual items.</p></section><section><h3>Method:</h3><p>To promote critical reflection, an exam wrapper, without the return of a completed exam, was implemented. Students were encouraged to take deeper ownership of learning and be active in the process of exam review.</p></section><section><h3>Results:</h3><p>Most students strongly agreed or agreed that they adjusted their study strategies based on their self-reflection (68.5%) or on the instructor feedback (66.7%) provided through the wrapper. All faculty stated the process of using wrappers was much more or more valuable and efficient, compared to prior post-exam feedback methods.</p></section><section><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>Using an exam wrapper as a stand-alone, post-exam debrief, students assume a more proactive role by reflecting on individual exam preparation and learning strategies without the return of a completed exam. <strong>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(X):XXX–XXX.]</strong></p></section>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Education\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240417-01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240417-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:考后复习时向学生透露已完成的考试可能既耗时又无效。方法:为了促进批判性反思,我们采用了一种考试包装方法,不返还已完成的考试。结果:大多数学生非常同意或同意他们根据自我反思(68.5%)或教师通过包装提供的反馈(66.7%)调整了学习策略。所有教师都表示,与之前的考后反馈方法相比,使用包装袋的过程更有价值或更有效率。结论:使用考试包装袋作为独立的考后汇报,学生可以通过反思个人备考和学习策略,而无需交还已完成的考试,从而发挥更积极主动的作用。[J Nurs Educ.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-Exam Wrappers: A Tool for Critical Reflection

Background:

Post-exam review sessions that reveal a completed exam to students can be time-consuming and ineffective. Additionally, the review may jeopardize exam integrity by exposing the individual items.

Method:

To promote critical reflection, an exam wrapper, without the return of a completed exam, was implemented. Students were encouraged to take deeper ownership of learning and be active in the process of exam review.

Results:

Most students strongly agreed or agreed that they adjusted their study strategies based on their self-reflection (68.5%) or on the instructor feedback (66.7%) provided through the wrapper. All faculty stated the process of using wrappers was much more or more valuable and efficient, compared to prior post-exam feedback methods.

Conclusion:

Using an exam wrapper as a stand-alone, post-exam debrief, students assume a more proactive role by reflecting on individual exam preparation and learning strategies without the return of a completed exam. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX–XXX.]

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Education is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles and new ideas for nurse educators in various types and levels of nursing programs for over 50 years. The Journal enhances the teaching-learning process, promotes curriculum development, and stimulates creative innovation and research in nursing education.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the Power of NursingTM on Classroom Connectedness. Unveiling the SChematic Organization of Pharmacological Information for Nurses: A New Approach to Pharmacology Education for Nurses. Simulation Experiences Focusing on Addressing Culturally Based Hidden Bias and RacisM (A-CHARM). Simulation Expert Modeling to Teach Sensitive Screening in Nursing Education. Incorporating Social Needs Screening in Simulation for Family Nurse Practitioner Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1