评估复合材料高速 DCB 测试的测量不确定性

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS Mechanics Research Communications Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1016/j.mechrescom.2024.104276
Thomas Fourest, Gérald Portemont
{"title":"评估复合材料高速 DCB 测试的测量不确定性","authors":"Thomas Fourest,&nbsp;Gérald Portemont","doi":"10.1016/j.mechrescom.2024.104276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates dynamic behavior in Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) tests across loading rates from 6 mm/min to 3 m/s. Comprehensive instrumentation has been used to investigate the sources of measurement errors (load, opening and crack length) or biases (asymmetry) and to quantify their effects on the fracture toughness determination using three variations of the Corrected Beam Theory. In particular, challenges in establishing zero load and displacement references were revealed through monitoring initial test phases. The resulting uncertainties in the fracture toughness have been estimated to be between 7 and 15%. Arms asymmetry during higher loading rates (1 m/s and 3 m/s) has been recorded using Digital Images Correlation. Using this data and a simple beam model, mode mixity (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>G</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>I</mi></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mrow><mi>G</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> from Williams approach) computed is in the order of 10%–20%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49846,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics Research Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing measurement uncertainties on high-speed DCB testing of composites\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Fourest,&nbsp;Gérald Portemont\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mechrescom.2024.104276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates dynamic behavior in Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) tests across loading rates from 6 mm/min to 3 m/s. Comprehensive instrumentation has been used to investigate the sources of measurement errors (load, opening and crack length) or biases (asymmetry) and to quantify their effects on the fracture toughness determination using three variations of the Corrected Beam Theory. In particular, challenges in establishing zero load and displacement references were revealed through monitoring initial test phases. The resulting uncertainties in the fracture toughness have been estimated to be between 7 and 15%. Arms asymmetry during higher loading rates (1 m/s and 3 m/s) has been recorded using Digital Images Correlation. Using this data and a simple beam model, mode mixity (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>G</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>I</mi></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mrow><mi>G</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> from Williams approach) computed is in the order of 10%–20%.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mechanics Research Communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mechanics Research Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093641324000363\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093641324000363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了双悬臂梁(DCB)试验中的动态行为,加载速率从 6 毫米/分钟到 3 米/秒不等。使用综合仪器研究了测量误差(载荷、开口和裂缝长度)或偏差(不对称)的来源,并利用校正梁理论的三种变体量化了它们对断裂韧性测定的影响。特别是,通过对初始测试阶段的监测,发现了在建立零载荷和位移基准方面存在的挑战。由此产生的断裂韧性不确定性估计在 7-15% 之间。使用数字图像相关技术记录了较高加载速率(1 m/s 和 3 m/s)下的臂不对称情况。利用这些数据和一个简单的梁模型,计算出的模式混合度(威廉姆斯方法中的 GII/GI)约为 10%-20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing measurement uncertainties on high-speed DCB testing of composites

This study investigates dynamic behavior in Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) tests across loading rates from 6 mm/min to 3 m/s. Comprehensive instrumentation has been used to investigate the sources of measurement errors (load, opening and crack length) or biases (asymmetry) and to quantify their effects on the fracture toughness determination using three variations of the Corrected Beam Theory. In particular, challenges in establishing zero load and displacement references were revealed through monitoring initial test phases. The resulting uncertainties in the fracture toughness have been estimated to be between 7 and 15%. Arms asymmetry during higher loading rates (1 m/s and 3 m/s) has been recorded using Digital Images Correlation. Using this data and a simple beam model, mode mixity (GII/GI from Williams approach) computed is in the order of 10%–20%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Mechanics Research Communications publishes, as rapidly as possible, peer-reviewed manuscripts of high standards but restricted length. It aims to provide: • a fast means of communication • an exchange of ideas among workers in mechanics • an effective method of bringing new results quickly to the public • an informal vehicle for the discussion • of ideas that may still be in the formative stages The field of Mechanics will be understood to encompass the behavior of continua, fluids, solids, particles and their mixtures. Submissions must contain a strong, novel contribution to the field of mechanics, and ideally should be focused on current issues in the field involving theoretical, experimental and/or applied research, preferably within the broad expertise encompassed by the Board of Associate Editors. Deviations from these areas should be discussed in advance with the Editor-in-Chief.
期刊最新文献
Transformation of surface H-forces in high grade elasticity Study of circumferential SH-wave interaction with a piezoelectric cylinder having pre-stressed viscoelastic imperfect coating Hybrid finite element theory in dynamic analysis of an imperfect plate Editorial Board Flexoelectric anisotropy and shear contributions in lead-free piezocomposites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1