评估确定光动力对单种和双种细菌生物膜作用的定量方法。

IF 2.7 3区 化学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-04 DOI:10.1007/s43630-024-00586-7
Rocío B Acosta, Edgardo N Durantini, Mariana B Spesia
{"title":"评估确定光动力对单种和双种细菌生物膜作用的定量方法。","authors":"Rocío B Acosta, Edgardo N Durantini, Mariana B Spesia","doi":"10.1007/s43630-024-00586-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of photodynamic inactivation (PDI) sensitized by 5,10,15,20-tetra(4-N,N,N-trimethylammoniophenyl)porphyrin (TMAP<sup>4+</sup>) on different components of mono- and dual-species biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli was determined by different methods. First, the plate count technique showed that TMAP<sup>4+</sup>-PDI was more effective on S. aureus than E. coli biofilm. However, crystal violet staining revealed no significant differences between before and after PDI biofilms of both bacteria. On the other hand, the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide method indicated a reduction in viable cells as the light exposure time increases in both, mono- and dual-species biofilms. Furthermore, it was determined that as the irradiation time increases, the amount of extracellular polymeric substances present in the biofilms decreased. This effect was presented in both strains and in the mixed biofilm, being more evident in S. aureus mono-specie biofilm. Finally, scanning electron microscopy analysis showed a decrease in the number of cells forming the biofilm after photosensitization treatments. This information makes it possible to determine whether the photodynamic action is based on damage to metabolic activity, extracellular matrix and/or biomass, which may be useful in establishing a fully effective PDI protocol for the treatment of microorganisms growing as biofilms.</p>","PeriodicalId":98,"journal":{"name":"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of quantification methods to determine photodynamic action on mono- and dual-species bacterial biofilms.\",\"authors\":\"Rocío B Acosta, Edgardo N Durantini, Mariana B Spesia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43630-024-00586-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The effect of photodynamic inactivation (PDI) sensitized by 5,10,15,20-tetra(4-N,N,N-trimethylammoniophenyl)porphyrin (TMAP<sup>4+</sup>) on different components of mono- and dual-species biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli was determined by different methods. First, the plate count technique showed that TMAP<sup>4+</sup>-PDI was more effective on S. aureus than E. coli biofilm. However, crystal violet staining revealed no significant differences between before and after PDI biofilms of both bacteria. On the other hand, the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide method indicated a reduction in viable cells as the light exposure time increases in both, mono- and dual-species biofilms. Furthermore, it was determined that as the irradiation time increases, the amount of extracellular polymeric substances present in the biofilms decreased. This effect was presented in both strains and in the mixed biofilm, being more evident in S. aureus mono-specie biofilm. Finally, scanning electron microscopy analysis showed a decrease in the number of cells forming the biofilm after photosensitization treatments. This information makes it possible to determine whether the photodynamic action is based on damage to metabolic activity, extracellular matrix and/or biomass, which may be useful in establishing a fully effective PDI protocol for the treatment of microorganisms growing as biofilms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":98,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-024-00586-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-024-00586-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过不同的方法测定了 5、10、15、20-四(4-N,N,N-三甲基氨苯基)卟啉(TMAP4+)敏化的光动力灭活(PDI)对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌单种和双种生物膜不同成分的影响。首先,平板计数技术表明,TMAP4+-PDI 对金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的作用比对大肠杆菌生物膜的作用更强。然而,水晶紫染色显示,两种细菌的 PDI 生物膜前后并无显著差异。另一方面,3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基溴化四唑方法表明,随着光照时间的增加,单种和双种生物膜中的存活细胞都会减少。此外,研究还发现,随着照射时间的延长,生物膜中的胞外聚合物质数量也在减少。这种效应在两种菌株和混合生物膜中都存在,在金黄色葡萄球菌单种生物膜中更为明显。最后,扫描电子显微镜分析表明,光敏处理后形成生物膜的细胞数量减少。这些信息有助于确定光动力作用是否基于对新陈代谢活动、细胞外基质和/或生物量的破坏,这可能有助于建立一种完全有效的 PDI 方案,用于治疗以生物膜形式生长的微生物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of quantification methods to determine photodynamic action on mono- and dual-species bacterial biofilms.

The effect of photodynamic inactivation (PDI) sensitized by 5,10,15,20-tetra(4-N,N,N-trimethylammoniophenyl)porphyrin (TMAP4+) on different components of mono- and dual-species biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli was determined by different methods. First, the plate count technique showed that TMAP4+-PDI was more effective on S. aureus than E. coli biofilm. However, crystal violet staining revealed no significant differences between before and after PDI biofilms of both bacteria. On the other hand, the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide method indicated a reduction in viable cells as the light exposure time increases in both, mono- and dual-species biofilms. Furthermore, it was determined that as the irradiation time increases, the amount of extracellular polymeric substances present in the biofilms decreased. This effect was presented in both strains and in the mixed biofilm, being more evident in S. aureus mono-specie biofilm. Finally, scanning electron microscopy analysis showed a decrease in the number of cells forming the biofilm after photosensitization treatments. This information makes it possible to determine whether the photodynamic action is based on damage to metabolic activity, extracellular matrix and/or biomass, which may be useful in establishing a fully effective PDI protocol for the treatment of microorganisms growing as biofilms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
201
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: A society-owned journal publishing high quality research on all aspects of photochemistry and photobiology.
期刊最新文献
A novel fluorescent probe for viscosity and polarity detection in real tobacco root cells and biological imaging. How to fight acute sun damage? Current skin care strategies. Cefadroxil photodegradation processes sensitized by natural pigments: mechanistic aspects and impact on the antimicrobial function. Visible light potentiates rapid cell destruction and death by curcumin in vitro. Recent development of nanomaterials-based PDT to improve immunogenic cell death.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1