丹麦姑息治疗数据库的第一个十年:在专业姑息治疗的质量和使用方面的改进和持续挑战。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Acta Oncologica Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.2340/1651-226X.2024.28515
Mathilde Adsersen, Maiken Bang Hansen, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard, Per Sjøgren, Mai-Britt Guldin, Mogens Groenvold
{"title":"丹麦姑息治疗数据库的第一个十年:在专业姑息治疗的质量和使用方面的改进和持续挑战。","authors":"Mathilde Adsersen, Maiken Bang Hansen, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard, Per Sjøgren, Mai-Britt Guldin, Mogens Groenvold","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.28515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Danish Palliative Care Database comprises five quality indicators: (1) Contact with specialised palliative care (SPC) among referred patients, (2) Waiting time of less than 10 days, (3) Proportion of patients who died from (A) cancer or (B) non-cancer diseases, and had contact with SPC, (4) Proportion of patients completing the patient-reported outcome measure at baseline (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL), and (5) Proportion of patients discussed at a multidisciplinary conference.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate changes in the quality indicators from 2010 until 2020 in cancer and non-cancer patients. Patients/material: Patients aged 18+ years who died from 2010 until 2020.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Register-based study with the Danish Palliative Care Database as the main data source. Indicator changes were reported as percentage fulfilment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2010 until 2020, the proportion of patients with non-cancer diseases in SPC increased slightly (2.5-7.2%). In 2019, fulfilment of the five indicators for cancer and non-cancer were: (1) 81% vs. 73%; (2) 73% vs. 68%; (3A) 50%; (3B) 2%; (4) 73% vs. 66%; (5) 73% vs. 65%. Whereas all other indicators improved, the proportion of patients waiting less than 10 days from referral to contact decreased. Differences between type of unit were found, mainly lower for hospice.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Most patients in SPC had cancer. All indicators except waiting time improved during the 10-year period. The establishment of the Danish Palliative Care Database may have contributed to the positive development; however, SPC in Denmark needs to be improved, especially regarding a reduction in waiting time and enhanced contact for non-cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"63 ","pages":"259-266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The first decade of the Danish Palliative Care Database: improvements and ongoing challenges in the quality and use of specialised palliative care.\",\"authors\":\"Mathilde Adsersen, Maiken Bang Hansen, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard, Per Sjøgren, Mai-Britt Guldin, Mogens Groenvold\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.28515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Danish Palliative Care Database comprises five quality indicators: (1) Contact with specialised palliative care (SPC) among referred patients, (2) Waiting time of less than 10 days, (3) Proportion of patients who died from (A) cancer or (B) non-cancer diseases, and had contact with SPC, (4) Proportion of patients completing the patient-reported outcome measure at baseline (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL), and (5) Proportion of patients discussed at a multidisciplinary conference.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate changes in the quality indicators from 2010 until 2020 in cancer and non-cancer patients. Patients/material: Patients aged 18+ years who died from 2010 until 2020.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Register-based study with the Danish Palliative Care Database as the main data source. Indicator changes were reported as percentage fulfilment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2010 until 2020, the proportion of patients with non-cancer diseases in SPC increased slightly (2.5-7.2%). In 2019, fulfilment of the five indicators for cancer and non-cancer were: (1) 81% vs. 73%; (2) 73% vs. 68%; (3A) 50%; (3B) 2%; (4) 73% vs. 66%; (5) 73% vs. 65%. Whereas all other indicators improved, the proportion of patients waiting less than 10 days from referral to contact decreased. Differences between type of unit were found, mainly lower for hospice.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Most patients in SPC had cancer. All indicators except waiting time improved during the 10-year period. The establishment of the Danish Palliative Care Database may have contributed to the positive development; however, SPC in Denmark needs to be improved, especially regarding a reduction in waiting time and enhanced contact for non-cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"259-266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332489/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.28515\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.28515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景丹麦姑息关怀数据库包括五项质量指标:(1)转诊患者与专业姑息治疗(SPC)的联系;(2)少于 10 天的等待时间;(3)死于(A)癌症或(B)非癌症疾病并与 SPC 联系的患者比例;(4)基线时完成患者报告结果测量(EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL)的患者比例;(5)在多学科会议上讨论的患者比例。目的:调查癌症和非癌症患者的质量指标从 2010 年到 2020 年的变化情况。患者/材料:2010 年至 2020 年死亡的 18 岁以上患者:方法:以丹麦姑息治疗数据库为主要数据来源的登记研究。指标变化以完成百分比报告:从 2010 年到 2020 年,SPC 中的非癌症患者比例略有增加(2.5-7.2%)。2019年,癌症和非癌症五项指标的完成率分别为(1)81%对73%;(2)73%对68%;(3A)50%;(3B)2%;(4)73%对66%;(5)73%对65%。虽然所有其他指标都有所改善,但从转诊到取得联系等待时间少于 10 天的患者比例却有所下降。不同科室之间存在差异,主要是临终关怀科的比例较低:SPC的大多数病人都患有癌症。10 年间,除等待时间外,所有指标均有所改善。丹麦姑息关怀数据库的建立可能促成了这一积极进展;然而,丹麦的姑息关怀服务仍需改进,尤其是在缩短等待时间和加强与非癌症患者的联系方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The first decade of the Danish Palliative Care Database: improvements and ongoing challenges in the quality and use of specialised palliative care.

Background: Danish Palliative Care Database comprises five quality indicators: (1) Contact with specialised palliative care (SPC) among referred patients, (2) Waiting time of less than 10 days, (3) Proportion of patients who died from (A) cancer or (B) non-cancer diseases, and had contact with SPC, (4) Proportion of patients completing the patient-reported outcome measure at baseline (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL), and (5) Proportion of patients discussed at a multidisciplinary conference.

Purpose: To investigate changes in the quality indicators from 2010 until 2020 in cancer and non-cancer patients. Patients/material: Patients aged 18+ years who died from 2010 until 2020.

Method: Register-based study with the Danish Palliative Care Database as the main data source. Indicator changes were reported as percentage fulfilment.

Results: From 2010 until 2020, the proportion of patients with non-cancer diseases in SPC increased slightly (2.5-7.2%). In 2019, fulfilment of the five indicators for cancer and non-cancer were: (1) 81% vs. 73%; (2) 73% vs. 68%; (3A) 50%; (3B) 2%; (4) 73% vs. 66%; (5) 73% vs. 65%. Whereas all other indicators improved, the proportion of patients waiting less than 10 days from referral to contact decreased. Differences between type of unit were found, mainly lower for hospice.

Interpretation: Most patients in SPC had cancer. All indicators except waiting time improved during the 10-year period. The establishment of the Danish Palliative Care Database may have contributed to the positive development; however, SPC in Denmark needs to be improved, especially regarding a reduction in waiting time and enhanced contact for non-cancer patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
期刊最新文献
Patient reported experiences of health care, quality of life and preoperative information in colon cancer. Survival outcomes for HER2-low breast cancer: Danish national data. The risk of venous thromboembolism in adult patients with diffuse glioma: a nationwide population-based study. NIVO-TIL: combination anti-PD-1 therapy and adoptive T-cell transfer in untreated metastatic melanoma: an exploratory open-label phase I trial. The impact of age on clinicopathological features and treatment results in patients with localised prostate cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1