[不同体重指数的年轻男性静息能量消耗特征及预测公式评估]。

Q3 Medicine 北京大学学报(医学版) Pub Date : 2024-04-18
Yifan Wu, Yingxiang Yu, Lan Xie, Zhida Zhang, Cuiqing Chang
{"title":"[不同体重指数的年轻男性静息能量消耗特征及预测公式评估]。","authors":"Yifan Wu, Yingxiang Yu, Lan Xie, Zhida Zhang, Cuiqing Chang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the resting energy expenditure (REE) characteristics among young men with different body mass indexes (BMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty young men [average age was (26.93±4.16) years] were enrolled in this study. They underwent resting metabolism tests in the Department of Sports Medicine of Peking University Third Hospital from December 2017 to June 2021. The resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured by indirect calorimetry, the body composition was measured by bioresistance antibody component analyzer. The REE characteristics were analyzed, and 11 predictive equations were used to estimate RMR and compared with the measured value. The differences were analyzed by paired <i>t</i>-test and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RMR of the overall 30 young men was (1 960.17±463.11) kcal/d (1 kcal=4.186 8 kJ). Including (1 744.33±249.62) kcal/d in those with normal BMI, which was significantly lower than that in those who were overweight or obese [(2 104.06± 520.32) kcal/d, <i>P</i> < 0.01], but the weight-corrected RMR in those with normal BMI was significantly higher than that in those who were overweight or obese [(24.02±2.61) kcal/(kg·d) <i>vs</i>. (19.98±4.38) kcal/(kg·d), <i>P</i> < 0.01]. The RMR was significantly and positively correlated with body weight, adiposity, lean body mass, body surface area, and extracellular fluid in the subjects with diffe-rent BMI (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). The predicted values of the 11 prediction equations were not in good agreement with the measured values (all ICC < 0.75), with relatively high agreement between the predicted and measured values of the World Health Organization (WHO) equation in overweight obese young men (ICC=0.547, <i>P</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were significant differences in RMR among young men with different BMI, and the RMR after weight correction should be considered for those who were overweight or obese. The consistency between the predicted values of different prediction equations and the actual measured values of RMR was relatively poor, and it is recommended to accurately measure RMR by indirect calorimetry. For overweight or obese young men, the WHO prediction equation can be considered to calculate RMR, but it is necessary to establish an RMR prediction equation applicable to different BMI populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8790,"journal":{"name":"北京大学学报(医学版)","volume":"56 2","pages":"247-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11004973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Characteristics of resting energy expenditure and evaluation of prediction formulas in young men with different body mass indexes].\",\"authors\":\"Yifan Wu, Yingxiang Yu, Lan Xie, Zhida Zhang, Cuiqing Chang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the resting energy expenditure (REE) characteristics among young men with different body mass indexes (BMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty young men [average age was (26.93±4.16) years] were enrolled in this study. They underwent resting metabolism tests in the Department of Sports Medicine of Peking University Third Hospital from December 2017 to June 2021. The resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured by indirect calorimetry, the body composition was measured by bioresistance antibody component analyzer. The REE characteristics were analyzed, and 11 predictive equations were used to estimate RMR and compared with the measured value. The differences were analyzed by paired <i>t</i>-test and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RMR of the overall 30 young men was (1 960.17±463.11) kcal/d (1 kcal=4.186 8 kJ). Including (1 744.33±249.62) kcal/d in those with normal BMI, which was significantly lower than that in those who were overweight or obese [(2 104.06± 520.32) kcal/d, <i>P</i> < 0.01], but the weight-corrected RMR in those with normal BMI was significantly higher than that in those who were overweight or obese [(24.02±2.61) kcal/(kg·d) <i>vs</i>. (19.98±4.38) kcal/(kg·d), <i>P</i> < 0.01]. The RMR was significantly and positively correlated with body weight, adiposity, lean body mass, body surface area, and extracellular fluid in the subjects with diffe-rent BMI (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). The predicted values of the 11 prediction equations were not in good agreement with the measured values (all ICC < 0.75), with relatively high agreement between the predicted and measured values of the World Health Organization (WHO) equation in overweight obese young men (ICC=0.547, <i>P</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were significant differences in RMR among young men with different BMI, and the RMR after weight correction should be considered for those who were overweight or obese. The consistency between the predicted values of different prediction equations and the actual measured values of RMR was relatively poor, and it is recommended to accurately measure RMR by indirect calorimetry. For overweight or obese young men, the WHO prediction equation can be considered to calculate RMR, but it is necessary to establish an RMR prediction equation applicable to different BMI populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"北京大学学报(医学版)\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"247-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11004973/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"北京大学学报(医学版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"北京大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较不同体重指数(BMI)的年轻男性的静息能量消耗(REE)特征:比较不同体重指数(BMI)的年轻男性的静息能量消耗(REE)特征:研究对象为 30 名年轻男性[平均年龄为(26.93±4.16)岁]。他们于 2017 年 12 月至 2021 年 6 月在北京大学第三医院运动医学科接受了静息代谢测试。静息代谢率(RMR)由间接热量计测量,身体成分由生物电阻抗体成分分析仪测量。分析 REE 特征,使用 11 个预测方程估算 RMR,并与测量值进行比较。差异通过配对 t 检验和类内相关系数(ICC)进行分析:结果:30 名年轻男性的总 RMR 为(1 960.17±463.11 )千卡/天(1 千卡=4.186 8 千焦)。包括体重指数正常者的(1 744.33±249.62 )千卡/天,明显低于超重或肥胖者[(2 104.06±520.32 )千卡/天,P < 0.01],但体重指数正常者的体重校正 RMR 明显高于超重或肥胖者[(24.02±2.61) kcal/(kg-d) vs. (19.98±4.38) kcal/(kg-d),P < 0.01]。在不同体重指数的受试者中,RMR 与体重、脂肪含量、瘦体重、体表面积和细胞外液呈明显的正相关(均 P < 0.05)。11 个预测方程的预测值与测量值的一致性不佳(ICC 均<0.75),而世界卫生组织(WHO)方程对超重肥胖年轻男性的预测值与测量值的一致性相对较高(ICC=0.547,P<0.01):结论:不同体重指数的年轻男性的 RMR 存在明显差异,超重或肥胖者应考虑体重校正后的 RMR。不同预测方程的 RMR 预测值与实际测量值的一致性相对较差,建议采用间接热量计准确测量 RMR。对于超重或肥胖的年轻男性,可考虑采用世界卫生组织的预测方程来计算 RMR,但有必要建立一个适用于不同体重指数人群的 RMR 预测方程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Characteristics of resting energy expenditure and evaluation of prediction formulas in young men with different body mass indexes].

Objective: To compare the resting energy expenditure (REE) characteristics among young men with different body mass indexes (BMI).

Methods: Thirty young men [average age was (26.93±4.16) years] were enrolled in this study. They underwent resting metabolism tests in the Department of Sports Medicine of Peking University Third Hospital from December 2017 to June 2021. The resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured by indirect calorimetry, the body composition was measured by bioresistance antibody component analyzer. The REE characteristics were analyzed, and 11 predictive equations were used to estimate RMR and compared with the measured value. The differences were analyzed by paired t-test and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: The RMR of the overall 30 young men was (1 960.17±463.11) kcal/d (1 kcal=4.186 8 kJ). Including (1 744.33±249.62) kcal/d in those with normal BMI, which was significantly lower than that in those who were overweight or obese [(2 104.06± 520.32) kcal/d, P < 0.01], but the weight-corrected RMR in those with normal BMI was significantly higher than that in those who were overweight or obese [(24.02±2.61) kcal/(kg·d) vs. (19.98±4.38) kcal/(kg·d), P < 0.01]. The RMR was significantly and positively correlated with body weight, adiposity, lean body mass, body surface area, and extracellular fluid in the subjects with diffe-rent BMI (all P < 0.05). The predicted values of the 11 prediction equations were not in good agreement with the measured values (all ICC < 0.75), with relatively high agreement between the predicted and measured values of the World Health Organization (WHO) equation in overweight obese young men (ICC=0.547, P < 0.01).

Conclusion: There were significant differences in RMR among young men with different BMI, and the RMR after weight correction should be considered for those who were overweight or obese. The consistency between the predicted values of different prediction equations and the actual measured values of RMR was relatively poor, and it is recommended to accurately measure RMR by indirect calorimetry. For overweight or obese young men, the WHO prediction equation can be considered to calculate RMR, but it is necessary to establish an RMR prediction equation applicable to different BMI populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
北京大学学报(医学版)
北京大学学报(医学版) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9815
期刊介绍: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban / Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), established in 1959, is a national academic journal sponsored by Peking University, and its former name is Journal of Beijing Medical University. The coverage of the Journal includes basic medical sciences, clinical medicine, oral medicine, surgery, public health and epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacy. Over the last few years, the Journal has published articles and reports covering major topics in the different special issues (e.g. research on disease genome, theory of drug withdrawal, mechanism and prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, stomatology, orthopaedic, public health, urology and reproductive medicine). All the topics involve latest advances in medical sciences, hot topics in specific specialties, and prevention and treatment of major diseases. The Journal has been indexed and abstracted by PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCO, Embase, Scopus, Chemical Abstracts (CA), Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPR), JSTChina, and almost all the Chinese sciences and technical index systems, including Chinese Science and Technology Paper Citation Database (CSTPCD), Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), China BioMedical Bibliographic Database (CBM), CMCI, Chinese Biological Abstracts, China National Academic Magazine Data-Base (CNKI), Wanfang Data (ChinaInfo), etc.
期刊最新文献
[Clinical diagnosis and treatment of renal angiomyolipoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus]. [Clinical effects of transesophageal echocardiography in different surgical methods for nephrectomy combined with Mayo Ⅲ-Ⅳ vena tumor thrombectomy]. [Clinical treatment and prognosis of adrenocortical carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus]. [Construction of a predictive model for postoperative pain relief after microscopic spermatic cord surgery for spermatic cord pain]. [Association between the triglyceride-glucose index and the incidence of nephrolithiasis in male individuals].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1