{"title":"从个人临床常规数据中确定关键 AMEI 性能参数的简便方法 - 第 1 部分:最大输出。","authors":"Hannes Maier, Thomas Lenarz, Susan Busch","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2341100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The frequency specific maximum output (MO) of active middle ear implants is the most crucial parameter for speech intelligibility. We determined individual MO from clinical routine data in round window (RW) coupling of the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Monocentric, retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>68 ears implanted with the VSB at the RW were analysed. Using bone conduction and direct threshold, MO was determined for combinations of implants (VORP502, VORP503) and processors (Samba, Amadé). Coupling modes were: (A) without coupler (N = 28), (B) spherical coupler (N = 19), (C) soft coupler (N = 10) or (D) custom-made \"Hannover coupler\" (N = 11).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MO frequency dependence was similar for coupling types (A-D) with a maximum at 1.5 kHz. No differences between groups were observed, although the average MO of the soft coupler was 10 dB lower. The average MO (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 kHz) was (A) 77.6 ± 15.0 dB HL, (B) 81.0 ± 11.1 dB HL, (C) 67.6 ± 17.9 dB HL (C), and (D) 79.6 ± 11.7 dB HL (D).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The individual MO can be determined from patients' clinical data. It permits in-depth analyses of patient outcomes and definition of evidence-based indication and decision criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"290-297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An easy method to determine crucial AMEI performance parameters from clinical routine data in individuals - Part 1: maximum output.\",\"authors\":\"Hannes Maier, Thomas Lenarz, Susan Busch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14992027.2024.2341100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The frequency specific maximum output (MO) of active middle ear implants is the most crucial parameter for speech intelligibility. We determined individual MO from clinical routine data in round window (RW) coupling of the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Monocentric, retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>68 ears implanted with the VSB at the RW were analysed. Using bone conduction and direct threshold, MO was determined for combinations of implants (VORP502, VORP503) and processors (Samba, Amadé). Coupling modes were: (A) without coupler (N = 28), (B) spherical coupler (N = 19), (C) soft coupler (N = 10) or (D) custom-made \\\"Hannover coupler\\\" (N = 11).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MO frequency dependence was similar for coupling types (A-D) with a maximum at 1.5 kHz. No differences between groups were observed, although the average MO of the soft coupler was 10 dB lower. The average MO (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 kHz) was (A) 77.6 ± 15.0 dB HL, (B) 81.0 ± 11.1 dB HL, (C) 67.6 ± 17.9 dB HL (C), and (D) 79.6 ± 11.7 dB HL (D).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The individual MO can be determined from patients' clinical data. It permits in-depth analyses of patient outcomes and definition of evidence-based indication and decision criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"290-297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2341100\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2341100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:有源中耳植入体的特定频率最大输出(MO)是语音清晰度的最关键参数。我们从 Vibrant Soundbridge(VSB)圆窗(RW)耦合的临床常规数据中确定了单个 MO:研究样本:分析了 68 只在圆窗处植入 VSB 的耳朵。通过骨传导和直接阈值,确定了植入体(VORP502、VORP503)和处理器(Samba、Amadé)组合的 MO。耦合模式为(A) 无耦合器(28 个),(B) 球形耦合器(19 个),(C) 软耦合器(10 个)或 (D) 定制的 "汉诺威耦合器"(11 个):耦合类型(A-D)的 MO 频率依赖性相似,最大频率为 1.5 kHz。虽然软耦合器的平均 MO 值低 10 dB,但各组之间没有发现差异。平均 MO(0.5、1.0、2.0、4.0 kHz)为 (A) 77.6 ± 15.0 dB HL、(B) 81.0 ± 11.1 dB HL、(C) 67.6 ± 17.9 dB HL (C) 和 (D) 79.6 ± 11.7 dB HL (D):结论:可根据患者的临床数据确定个人 MO。结论:可根据患者的临床数据确定个人 MO,从而对患者的治疗效果进行深入分析,并确定循证适应症和决策标准。
An easy method to determine crucial AMEI performance parameters from clinical routine data in individuals - Part 1: maximum output.
Objective: The frequency specific maximum output (MO) of active middle ear implants is the most crucial parameter for speech intelligibility. We determined individual MO from clinical routine data in round window (RW) coupling of the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB).
Design: Monocentric, retrospective analysis.
Study sample: 68 ears implanted with the VSB at the RW were analysed. Using bone conduction and direct threshold, MO was determined for combinations of implants (VORP502, VORP503) and processors (Samba, Amadé). Coupling modes were: (A) without coupler (N = 28), (B) spherical coupler (N = 19), (C) soft coupler (N = 10) or (D) custom-made "Hannover coupler" (N = 11).
Results: The MO frequency dependence was similar for coupling types (A-D) with a maximum at 1.5 kHz. No differences between groups were observed, although the average MO of the soft coupler was 10 dB lower. The average MO (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 kHz) was (A) 77.6 ± 15.0 dB HL, (B) 81.0 ± 11.1 dB HL, (C) 67.6 ± 17.9 dB HL (C), and (D) 79.6 ± 11.7 dB HL (D).
Conclusion: The individual MO can be determined from patients' clinical data. It permits in-depth analyses of patient outcomes and definition of evidence-based indication and decision criteria.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.