降压药物治疗前和治疗期间通过诊室、家庭和门诊测量评估的血压变异性:REVERENT 随机试验的子分析。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003730
Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis, Anastasios Kollias, Grzegorz Bilo, Davide Soranna, Chang-Yuan Liu, Martino F Pengo, Antonella Zambon, Wei Zhang, Antonios Destounis, Ji-Guang Wang, George S Stergiou, Gianfranco Parati
{"title":"降压药物治疗前和治疗期间通过诊室、家庭和门诊测量评估的血压变异性:REVERENT 随机试验的子分析。","authors":"Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis, Anastasios Kollias, Grzegorz Bilo, Davide Soranna, Chang-Yuan Liu, Martino F Pengo, Antonella Zambon, Wei Zhang, Antonios Destounis, Ji-Guang Wang, George S Stergiou, Gianfranco Parati","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) can be assessed using office (OBP), home (HBP), or ambulatory BP (ABP) measurements. This analysis investigated the association and agreement between OBP, HBP, and ABP measurements for BPV assessment at baseline and 10 weeks after initiating antihypertensive drug therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Untreated hypertensive patients with elevated BPV were randomized to receive an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ramipril) or a calcium channel blocker (nifedipine GITS) in a 10-week, open-label, blinded-end point study. BPV was assessed using standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) (reading-to-reading analyses).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 146 participants from three research centers (Athens/Greece; Milan/Italy; Shanghai/China) were analyzed [mean age 53 ± 10 (SD) years, male individuals 60%, baseline systolic OBP, HBP, and 24 h ABP 144 ± 9, 138 ± 10, and 143 ± 10 mmHg, respectively]. Post-treatment minus pre-treatment systolic CV difference was: OBP: 0.3%, P  = 0.28; HBP: -0.2%, P  = 0.20; 24 h ABP: 1.1%, P  < 0.001. Home and ambulatory (not office) BPV indices presented weak-to-moderate correlation, both before and during treatment (range of coefficients 0.04-0.33). The correlation coefficient between systolic HBP and awake ABP CV was 0.21 and 0.28 before and during treatment, respectively ( P  < 0.05/< 0.001, respectively). Home and ambulatory (not office) BPV indices presented slight-to-fair agreement (range 64-73%) in detecting participants with high systolic BPV (top quartile of respective distributions) both before and during treatment (kappa range 0.04-0.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data showed a weak-to-moderate association between out-of-office (but not office) BPV indices both before and during BP-lowering treatment, with reasonable agreement in detecting individuals with high BPV. Out-of-office BP measurements provide more similar and consistent BPV information than office measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood pressure variability assessed by office, home, and ambulatory measurements before and during antihypertensive drug treatment: a sub-analysis of the REVERENT randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis, Anastasios Kollias, Grzegorz Bilo, Davide Soranna, Chang-Yuan Liu, Martino F Pengo, Antonella Zambon, Wei Zhang, Antonios Destounis, Ji-Guang Wang, George S Stergiou, Gianfranco Parati\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) can be assessed using office (OBP), home (HBP), or ambulatory BP (ABP) measurements. This analysis investigated the association and agreement between OBP, HBP, and ABP measurements for BPV assessment at baseline and 10 weeks after initiating antihypertensive drug therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Untreated hypertensive patients with elevated BPV were randomized to receive an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ramipril) or a calcium channel blocker (nifedipine GITS) in a 10-week, open-label, blinded-end point study. BPV was assessed using standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) (reading-to-reading analyses).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 146 participants from three research centers (Athens/Greece; Milan/Italy; Shanghai/China) were analyzed [mean age 53 ± 10 (SD) years, male individuals 60%, baseline systolic OBP, HBP, and 24 h ABP 144 ± 9, 138 ± 10, and 143 ± 10 mmHg, respectively]. Post-treatment minus pre-treatment systolic CV difference was: OBP: 0.3%, P  = 0.28; HBP: -0.2%, P  = 0.20; 24 h ABP: 1.1%, P  < 0.001. Home and ambulatory (not office) BPV indices presented weak-to-moderate correlation, both before and during treatment (range of coefficients 0.04-0.33). The correlation coefficient between systolic HBP and awake ABP CV was 0.21 and 0.28 before and during treatment, respectively ( P  < 0.05/< 0.001, respectively). Home and ambulatory (not office) BPV indices presented slight-to-fair agreement (range 64-73%) in detecting participants with high systolic BPV (top quartile of respective distributions) both before and during treatment (kappa range 0.04-0.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data showed a weak-to-moderate association between out-of-office (but not office) BPV indices both before and during BP-lowering treatment, with reasonable agreement in detecting individuals with high BPV. Out-of-office BP measurements provide more similar and consistent BPV information than office measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003730\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003730","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:血压(BP)变异性(BPV)可通过办公室血压(OBP)、家庭血压(HBP)或流动血压(ABP)测量进行评估。本分析调查了在基线和开始降压药物治疗 10 周后,OBP、HBP 和 ABP 测量与 BPV 评估之间的关联性和一致性:在一项为期 10 周的开放标签、盲法终点研究中,未经治疗且血压升高的高血压患者被随机分配接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(雷米普利)或钙通道阻滞剂(硝苯地平 GITS)治疗。采用标准差(SD)和变异系数(CV)(读数对读数分析)对血压进行评估:分析了来自三个研究中心(雅典/希腊;米兰/意大利;上海/中国)的 146 名参与者的数据[平均年龄 53 ± 10 (SD) 岁,男性占 60%,基线收缩压 OBP、HBP 和 24 h ABP 分别为 144 ± 9、138 ± 10 和 143 ± 10 mmHg]。治疗后与治疗前收缩压 CV 差值为:OBP:0.3%;HBP:0.3%;24 h ABP:0.3%:OBP:0.3%,P = 0.28;HBP:-0.2%,P = 0.20;24 h ABP:1.1%,P 结论:这些数据表明,在降压治疗前和降压治疗期间,诊室外(而非诊室内)血压变异指数之间存在微弱至中等程度的关联,在检测高血压变异个体方面具有合理的一致性。与诊室测量相比,诊室外血压测量能提供更相似、更一致的血压变异信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blood pressure variability assessed by office, home, and ambulatory measurements before and during antihypertensive drug treatment: a sub-analysis of the REVERENT randomized trial.

Objectives: Blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) can be assessed using office (OBP), home (HBP), or ambulatory BP (ABP) measurements. This analysis investigated the association and agreement between OBP, HBP, and ABP measurements for BPV assessment at baseline and 10 weeks after initiating antihypertensive drug therapy.

Methods: Untreated hypertensive patients with elevated BPV were randomized to receive an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ramipril) or a calcium channel blocker (nifedipine GITS) in a 10-week, open-label, blinded-end point study. BPV was assessed using standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) (reading-to-reading analyses).

Results: Data from 146 participants from three research centers (Athens/Greece; Milan/Italy; Shanghai/China) were analyzed [mean age 53 ± 10 (SD) years, male individuals 60%, baseline systolic OBP, HBP, and 24 h ABP 144 ± 9, 138 ± 10, and 143 ± 10 mmHg, respectively]. Post-treatment minus pre-treatment systolic CV difference was: OBP: 0.3%, P  = 0.28; HBP: -0.2%, P  = 0.20; 24 h ABP: 1.1%, P  < 0.001. Home and ambulatory (not office) BPV indices presented weak-to-moderate correlation, both before and during treatment (range of coefficients 0.04-0.33). The correlation coefficient between systolic HBP and awake ABP CV was 0.21 and 0.28 before and during treatment, respectively ( P  < 0.05/< 0.001, respectively). Home and ambulatory (not office) BPV indices presented slight-to-fair agreement (range 64-73%) in detecting participants with high systolic BPV (top quartile of respective distributions) both before and during treatment (kappa range 0.04-0.27).

Conclusion: These data showed a weak-to-moderate association between out-of-office (but not office) BPV indices both before and during BP-lowering treatment, with reasonable agreement in detecting individuals with high BPV. Out-of-office BP measurements provide more similar and consistent BPV information than office measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hypertension
Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1389
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Quality-of-life and beliefs about medication in relation to a therapy adherence intervention in resistant hypertension: the Resistant HYpertension: MEasure to ReaCh Targets trial. Association between leisure-time physical activity and arterial stiffness in adults of the ELSA-Brasil study: a mediation analysis. Sleep blood pressure measured using a home blood pressure monitor was independently associated with cardiovascular disease incidence: the Nagahama study. Pulmonary vascular resistance predicts the mortality in patients with bronchiectasis-associated pulmonary hypertension. Association between liver fat level and risk of hypertension: evidence from a Chinese health examination dataset.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1