中国大流行期间精神病专科医院抗菌药物使用情况分析。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1080/14787210.2024.2351022
Zhiqiang Du, Qin Zhou, Yuan Shen, Rongrong Lu, Ying Jiang, Haohao Zhu
{"title":"中国大流行期间精神病专科医院抗菌药物使用情况分析。","authors":"Zhiqiang Du, Qin Zhou, Yuan Shen, Rongrong Lu, Ying Jiang, Haohao Zhu","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2351022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to compare antimicrobial drug usage in our hospital to Jiangsu Province and China from 2020 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A detailed analysis was performed using data from the National Antimicrobial Drug Clinical Application Monitoring Network. Several parameters were studied: the rate of antimicrobial drug use, number and types of drugs used, the rate of combined use, rate of microbiological examinations, drug use intensity, and cumulative Defined Daily Doses (DDDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2020 to 2022, our hospital's antimicrobial drug usage rate was consistently lower than Jiangsu Province and China. The average number of drug types and the combined drug use rate were higher in 2020 but fell below those in Jiangsu Province and China in 2021 and 2022. Our microbiological examination rate consistently surpassed that of Jiangsu Province and China. Furthermore, our Antimicrobial Usage Density and cumulative DDDs were notably lower. While AUD remained stable, DDDs showed a decreasing trend. The most dominant drug in DDDs was cefditoren, a third-generation cephalosporin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the pandemic years, our hospital not only met the requirements for antimicrobial drug usage, microbiological examination, AUD, and cumulative DDDs but also demonstrated a consistent year-by-year decrease in drug usage and DDDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"597-602"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of antimicrobial drug usage in psychiatric specialized hospitals during the pandemic in China.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiqiang Du, Qin Zhou, Yuan Shen, Rongrong Lu, Ying Jiang, Haohao Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14787210.2024.2351022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to compare antimicrobial drug usage in our hospital to Jiangsu Province and China from 2020 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A detailed analysis was performed using data from the National Antimicrobial Drug Clinical Application Monitoring Network. Several parameters were studied: the rate of antimicrobial drug use, number and types of drugs used, the rate of combined use, rate of microbiological examinations, drug use intensity, and cumulative Defined Daily Doses (DDDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2020 to 2022, our hospital's antimicrobial drug usage rate was consistently lower than Jiangsu Province and China. The average number of drug types and the combined drug use rate were higher in 2020 but fell below those in Jiangsu Province and China in 2021 and 2022. Our microbiological examination rate consistently surpassed that of Jiangsu Province and China. Furthermore, our Antimicrobial Usage Density and cumulative DDDs were notably lower. While AUD remained stable, DDDs showed a decreasing trend. The most dominant drug in DDDs was cefditoren, a third-generation cephalosporin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the pandemic years, our hospital not only met the requirements for antimicrobial drug usage, microbiological examination, AUD, and cumulative DDDs but also demonstrated a consistent year-by-year decrease in drug usage and DDDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"597-602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2024.2351022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2024.2351022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在比较 2020 年至 2022 年大流行期间我院与江苏省及中国的抗菌药物使用情况。研究的设计和方法:利用国家抗菌药物临床应用监测网的数据进行了详细分析。研究了几个参数:抗菌药物使用率、使用药物的数量和种类、联合使用率、微生物检查率、药物使用强度和累计定义日剂量(DDDs):2020-2022年,我院抗菌药物使用率(2020年5.59%,2021年6.0%,2022年5.0%)持续低于江苏省和全国,呈下降趋势。平均药物种类数和综合药物使用率在 2020 年较高,但在 2021 年和 2022 年低于江苏省和中国。我们的微生物检查率(70%-100%)一直高于江苏省和中国。此外,我国的抗菌药物使用密度(AUD,2.82-3.07)和累计DDD(9956.21-14267.91)明显降低。虽然抗生素使用密度保持稳定,但累计抗生素使用量却呈下降趋势。DDDs中最主要的药物是头孢地托伦,这是一种第三代头孢菌素:在大流行期间,与江苏省和中国相比,我院在抗菌药物使用、微生物检查、AUD 和累计 DDDs 方面不仅达到了要求,而且药物使用量和 DDDs 呈逐年下降趋势。这表明我院在保持抗菌药物合理使用方面取得了有效进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of antimicrobial drug usage in psychiatric specialized hospitals during the pandemic in China.

Background: This study aims to compare antimicrobial drug usage in our hospital to Jiangsu Province and China from 2020 to 2022.

Research design and methods: A detailed analysis was performed using data from the National Antimicrobial Drug Clinical Application Monitoring Network. Several parameters were studied: the rate of antimicrobial drug use, number and types of drugs used, the rate of combined use, rate of microbiological examinations, drug use intensity, and cumulative Defined Daily Doses (DDDs).

Results: From 2020 to 2022, our hospital's antimicrobial drug usage rate was consistently lower than Jiangsu Province and China. The average number of drug types and the combined drug use rate were higher in 2020 but fell below those in Jiangsu Province and China in 2021 and 2022. Our microbiological examination rate consistently surpassed that of Jiangsu Province and China. Furthermore, our Antimicrobial Usage Density and cumulative DDDs were notably lower. While AUD remained stable, DDDs showed a decreasing trend. The most dominant drug in DDDs was cefditoren, a third-generation cephalosporin.

Conclusions: During the pandemic years, our hospital not only met the requirements for antimicrobial drug usage, microbiological examination, AUD, and cumulative DDDs but also demonstrated a consistent year-by-year decrease in drug usage and DDDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy (ISSN 1478-7210) provides expert reviews on therapeutics and diagnostics in the treatment of infectious disease. Coverage includes antibiotics, drug resistance, drug therapy, infectious disease medicine, antibacterial, antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral approaches, and diagnostic tests.
期刊最新文献
Could the next "disease X" be a pandemic of virus-induced encephalitis? What should our first medical response be? The opportunities and challenges of epigenetic approaches to manage herpes simplex infections. Potential activity of nanomaterials to combat SARS-CoV-2 and mucormycosis ‎coinfection‎. Clinical effectiveness of oral antivirals for non-hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients aged 18-60 years. Is self-medication with antibiotics among the public a global concern: a mixed-methods systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1