Courtney L. Coules MPH, Clara B. Novotny MD, Margaret E. McDonough MD, Albert M. Kopak PhD
{"title":"同时使用甲基苯丙胺的办公室阿片类药物治疗(OBOT)患者的参与程度。","authors":"Courtney L. Coules MPH, Clara B. Novotny MD, Margaret E. McDonough MD, Albert M. Kopak PhD","doi":"10.1111/ajad.13572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Recent increases in methamphetamine use among people seeking treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) has created significant demand for effective approaches to support this clinical population. This study assessed the extent to which office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) patients, who were diagnosed with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD), engaged with providers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective analysis was conducted of adult patients (<i>n</i> = 470) seeking treatment for OUD who attended at least one visit between March 2020 and March 2023 at a rural regional OBOT provider. Approximately one quarter (28.7%) of patients were diagnosed with MUD in addition to receiving an OUD diagnosis. Bivariate methods and multivariate negative binomial regression models were estimated to examine the associations between clinical measures and the numbers of office visits, peer visits, and telehealth visits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Regression results indicated patients who met criteria for MUD in addition to OUD attended a higher rate of peer visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 2.63, <i>p</i> = .036) when compared to patients who did not meet criteria for MUD. In contrast, patients with MUD and OUD diagnoses displayed significantly lower (IRR = 0.68, <i>p</i> < .001) engagement rates through fewer office visits relative to those who did not meet MUD criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patients seeking treatment for OUD who meet criteria for MUD are more likely to engage through peer support specialists rather than office visits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Scientific Significance</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates the ways patients who meet criteria for OUD and MUD engage with providers to receive treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"33 5","pages":"583-589"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levels of engagement among office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) patients with concurrent methamphetamine use\",\"authors\":\"Courtney L. Coules MPH, Clara B. Novotny MD, Margaret E. McDonough MD, Albert M. Kopak PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajad.13572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Recent increases in methamphetamine use among people seeking treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) has created significant demand for effective approaches to support this clinical population. This study assessed the extent to which office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) patients, who were diagnosed with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD), engaged with providers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective analysis was conducted of adult patients (<i>n</i> = 470) seeking treatment for OUD who attended at least one visit between March 2020 and March 2023 at a rural regional OBOT provider. Approximately one quarter (28.7%) of patients were diagnosed with MUD in addition to receiving an OUD diagnosis. Bivariate methods and multivariate negative binomial regression models were estimated to examine the associations between clinical measures and the numbers of office visits, peer visits, and telehealth visits.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Regression results indicated patients who met criteria for MUD in addition to OUD attended a higher rate of peer visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 2.63, <i>p</i> = .036) when compared to patients who did not meet criteria for MUD. In contrast, patients with MUD and OUD diagnoses displayed significantly lower (IRR = 0.68, <i>p</i> < .001) engagement rates through fewer office visits relative to those who did not meet MUD criteria.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients seeking treatment for OUD who meet criteria for MUD are more likely to engage through peer support specialists rather than office visits.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Scientific Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study demonstrates the ways patients who meet criteria for OUD and MUD engage with providers to receive treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal on Addictions\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"583-589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal on Addictions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajad.13572\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal on Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajad.13572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Levels of engagement among office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) patients with concurrent methamphetamine use
Background and Objectives
Recent increases in methamphetamine use among people seeking treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) has created significant demand for effective approaches to support this clinical population. This study assessed the extent to which office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) patients, who were diagnosed with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD), engaged with providers.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted of adult patients (n = 470) seeking treatment for OUD who attended at least one visit between March 2020 and March 2023 at a rural regional OBOT provider. Approximately one quarter (28.7%) of patients were diagnosed with MUD in addition to receiving an OUD diagnosis. Bivariate methods and multivariate negative binomial regression models were estimated to examine the associations between clinical measures and the numbers of office visits, peer visits, and telehealth visits.
Results
Regression results indicated patients who met criteria for MUD in addition to OUD attended a higher rate of peer visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 2.63, p = .036) when compared to patients who did not meet criteria for MUD. In contrast, patients with MUD and OUD diagnoses displayed significantly lower (IRR = 0.68, p < .001) engagement rates through fewer office visits relative to those who did not meet MUD criteria.
Discussion and Conclusions
Patients seeking treatment for OUD who meet criteria for MUD are more likely to engage through peer support specialists rather than office visits.
Scientific Significance
This study demonstrates the ways patients who meet criteria for OUD and MUD engage with providers to receive treatment.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal on Addictions is the official journal of the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry. The Academy encourages research on the etiology, prevention, identification, and treatment of substance abuse; thus, the journal provides a forum for the dissemination of information in the extensive field of addiction. Each issue of this publication covers a wide variety of topics ranging from codependence to genetics, epidemiology to dual diagnostics, etiology to neuroscience, and much more. Features of the journal, all written by experts in the field, include special overview articles, clinical or basic research papers, clinical updates, and book reviews within the area of addictions.