护理点检测、就近病人检测和病人自我检测:警示点。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-08 Print Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1515/cclm-2024-0525
Giuseppe Banfi, Borut Božič, Murat Cihan, Daria Pašalić, Federico Pennestrì, Mario Plebani
{"title":"护理点检测、就近病人检测和病人自我检测:警示点。","authors":"Giuseppe Banfi, Borut Božič, Murat Cihan, Daria Pašalić, Federico Pennestrì, Mario Plebani","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2024-0525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Point-of-care testing (POCT), near-patient testing (NPT) and patient self-tests (PST) are diagnostic examinations performed at the time and place of patient care. While POCT and NPT are performed and analyzed by medical professionals, PST are based on samples and parameters directly collected and analyzed by lay users. These tests are spreading both in high income countries and in low to middle income countries as they are expected to improve healthcare efficiency and equity, by saving resources, releasing pressure from hospitals and reducing logistical barriers. However, accurate multidisciplinary assessment is mandatory to ensure that what they promise is real. We reviewed some important ethical aspects, international standards and regulations. The current risks associated with alternative ways of testing are explained by the principles of respect for patient autonomy and non-maleficence. Further evidence from multidisciplinary assessment is needed to evaluate pros and cons in light of the principles of beneficence and justice. Although POCT or NPT need common regulation and accurate provider training to ensure safe and appropriate interpretation of results, PST needs even more attention as they are subject to direct patient use. Randomized controlled trails including patient education should be conducted in order to provide reliable evidence on clinical outcomes, patient acceptance and cost-effectiveness. Mandatory regulation is needed to avoid harm and EU regulation should help different countries maintain a safe use of devices in a global population of producers and users.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-care testing, near-patient testing and patient self-testing: warning points.\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Banfi, Borut Božič, Murat Cihan, Daria Pašalić, Federico Pennestrì, Mario Plebani\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2024-0525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Point-of-care testing (POCT), near-patient testing (NPT) and patient self-tests (PST) are diagnostic examinations performed at the time and place of patient care. While POCT and NPT are performed and analyzed by medical professionals, PST are based on samples and parameters directly collected and analyzed by lay users. These tests are spreading both in high income countries and in low to middle income countries as they are expected to improve healthcare efficiency and equity, by saving resources, releasing pressure from hospitals and reducing logistical barriers. However, accurate multidisciplinary assessment is mandatory to ensure that what they promise is real. We reviewed some important ethical aspects, international standards and regulations. The current risks associated with alternative ways of testing are explained by the principles of respect for patient autonomy and non-maleficence. Further evidence from multidisciplinary assessment is needed to evaluate pros and cons in light of the principles of beneficence and justice. Although POCT or NPT need common regulation and accurate provider training to ensure safe and appropriate interpretation of results, PST needs even more attention as they are subject to direct patient use. Randomized controlled trails including patient education should be conducted in order to provide reliable evidence on clinical outcomes, patient acceptance and cost-effectiveness. Mandatory regulation is needed to avoid harm and EU regulation should help different countries maintain a safe use of devices in a global population of producers and users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0525\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

护理点检测(POCT)、就近病人检测(NPT)和病人自我检测(PST)是在病人护理的时间和地点进行的诊断检查。床旁检测(POCT)和就近病人检测(NPT)由医疗专业人员进行和分析,而病人自我检测(PST)则基于非专业用户直接采集和分析的样本和参数。这些检测在高收入国家和中低收入国家都在推广,因为它们有望通过节约资源、减轻医院压力和减少后勤障碍来提高医疗效率和公平性。然而,必须进行准确的多学科评估,以确保它们的承诺是真实的。我们回顾了一些重要的伦理问题、国际标准和法规。尊重病人自主权和非恶意原则解释了目前与替代检测方法相关的风险。还需要从多学科评估中获得更多证据,以便根据 "受益原则 "和 "公正原则 "评估利弊。虽然 POCT 或 NPT 需要共同的监管和对提供者的准确培训,以确保安全和适当地解释结果,但 PST 需要更多的关注,因为它们需要患者直接使用。应开展包括患者教育在内的随机对照试验,以便为临床结果、患者接受程度和成本效益提供可靠的证据。为避免伤害,需要制定强制性法规,欧盟法规应帮助不同国家在全球生产者和使用者群体中维护设备的安全使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Point-of-care testing, near-patient testing and patient self-testing: warning points.

Point-of-care testing (POCT), near-patient testing (NPT) and patient self-tests (PST) are diagnostic examinations performed at the time and place of patient care. While POCT and NPT are performed and analyzed by medical professionals, PST are based on samples and parameters directly collected and analyzed by lay users. These tests are spreading both in high income countries and in low to middle income countries as they are expected to improve healthcare efficiency and equity, by saving resources, releasing pressure from hospitals and reducing logistical barriers. However, accurate multidisciplinary assessment is mandatory to ensure that what they promise is real. We reviewed some important ethical aspects, international standards and regulations. The current risks associated with alternative ways of testing are explained by the principles of respect for patient autonomy and non-maleficence. Further evidence from multidisciplinary assessment is needed to evaluate pros and cons in light of the principles of beneficence and justice. Although POCT or NPT need common regulation and accurate provider training to ensure safe and appropriate interpretation of results, PST needs even more attention as they are subject to direct patient use. Randomized controlled trails including patient education should be conducted in order to provide reliable evidence on clinical outcomes, patient acceptance and cost-effectiveness. Mandatory regulation is needed to avoid harm and EU regulation should help different countries maintain a safe use of devices in a global population of producers and users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the clinical performance of anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin antibody and 14-3-3 eta testing in rheumatoid arthritis. Evidence for stability of cardiac troponin T concentrations measured with a high sensitivity TnT test in serum and lithium heparin plasma after six-year storage at -80 °C and multiple freeze-thaw cycles. Evaluation of revised UK-NEQAS CSF-xanthochromia method for subarachnoid hemorrhage: outcome data provide evidence for clinical value. Strategies to verify equimolar peptide release in mass spectrometry-based protein quantification exemplified for apolipoprotein(a). Cell population data in venous thrombo-embolism and erysipelas: a potential diagnostic tool?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1