印度一个 Nirmal Gram Puraskar 村的病媒保护措施现状和居民家庭对病媒传播疾病的认识。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Vector Borne Diseases Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-21 DOI:10.4103/JVBD.JVBD_27_24
A Rohit, Vijayalaxmi Mangasuli, A M Amrutha, Bhagyalaxmi Sidenur, S B Vijeth
{"title":"印度一个 Nirmal Gram Puraskar 村的病媒保护措施现状和居民家庭对病媒传播疾病的认识。","authors":"A Rohit, Vijayalaxmi Mangasuli, A M Amrutha, Bhagyalaxmi Sidenur, S B Vijeth","doi":"10.4103/JVBD.JVBD_27_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background objectives: </strong>Mosquito-bome diseases are increasing problems in various parts of the world, causing high mortality and morbidity for humans. This study was done to assess the vector protection measures taken by rural below poverty line (BPL) families, and to assess the awareness about vector-borne diseases along with Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) in rural BPL families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in a rural area which won \"Nirmal Gram Puraskar\" Award i.e., \"clean village\" among 96 below BPL families for a period of three months. These families (every 5 th ) were selected by systematic random sampling until we reached a sample size. Basic socio-demographic details, status of vector protection measures, solid waste management, vector-borne diseases and total sanitation campaign details were collected from the study participants. Pretested, semi-structured questionnaire was applied to the head of the families which included sanitation status at home by house-to-house visit. Data collected was analysed using SPSS version 20 and presented as frequency, percentages, mean and standard deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 96 families studied (454 adults and children), 84 (87.5%) were males and 12 (12.5%) were females. Among these, 291 (64.1%) were using one or the other mosquito protection measures, 52 (54.2%) were using bednets and 23 (23.9%) used coils. 12 families (12.5%) were not using any mosquito protection measures. In our study, 66 (68.8%) families had individual household latrine (IHHL) and 50 (52.1%) had open drainage. Even though 314 participants had an access to individual household latrine, 20 (6.36%) had practice of open air defecation compared to 127 (90.7%) who practiced open air defecation without an access to individual household latrine. When asked about the awareness regarding vector-borne diseases, 56 (58.3%) were aware about chikungunya, 47 (48.9%) about dengue, 46 (47.9%) about malaria, 14 (14.6%) and only 5 (5.2%) families were aware about Japanese encephalitis. In this study, 37 (38.5%) were aware about the total sanitation campaign and 40 (41.6%) about the government support for sanitation.</p><p><strong>Interpretation conclusion: </strong>While there is a general awareness of vector-borne diseases, the implementation of vector protection measures is not uniform across the village. There is a need for targeted interventions to improve the effectiveness of vector protection measures and increase awareness among the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":17660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vector Borne Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Status of vector protection measures and awareness regarding vector borne diseases in families residing in a \\\"Nirmal Gram Puraskar\\\" village in India.\",\"authors\":\"A Rohit, Vijayalaxmi Mangasuli, A M Amrutha, Bhagyalaxmi Sidenur, S B Vijeth\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JVBD.JVBD_27_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background objectives: </strong>Mosquito-bome diseases are increasing problems in various parts of the world, causing high mortality and morbidity for humans. This study was done to assess the vector protection measures taken by rural below poverty line (BPL) families, and to assess the awareness about vector-borne diseases along with Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) in rural BPL families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in a rural area which won \\\"Nirmal Gram Puraskar\\\" Award i.e., \\\"clean village\\\" among 96 below BPL families for a period of three months. These families (every 5 th ) were selected by systematic random sampling until we reached a sample size. Basic socio-demographic details, status of vector protection measures, solid waste management, vector-borne diseases and total sanitation campaign details were collected from the study participants. Pretested, semi-structured questionnaire was applied to the head of the families which included sanitation status at home by house-to-house visit. Data collected was analysed using SPSS version 20 and presented as frequency, percentages, mean and standard deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 96 families studied (454 adults and children), 84 (87.5%) were males and 12 (12.5%) were females. Among these, 291 (64.1%) were using one or the other mosquito protection measures, 52 (54.2%) were using bednets and 23 (23.9%) used coils. 12 families (12.5%) were not using any mosquito protection measures. In our study, 66 (68.8%) families had individual household latrine (IHHL) and 50 (52.1%) had open drainage. Even though 314 participants had an access to individual household latrine, 20 (6.36%) had practice of open air defecation compared to 127 (90.7%) who practiced open air defecation without an access to individual household latrine. When asked about the awareness regarding vector-borne diseases, 56 (58.3%) were aware about chikungunya, 47 (48.9%) about dengue, 46 (47.9%) about malaria, 14 (14.6%) and only 5 (5.2%) families were aware about Japanese encephalitis. In this study, 37 (38.5%) were aware about the total sanitation campaign and 40 (41.6%) about the government support for sanitation.</p><p><strong>Interpretation conclusion: </strong>While there is a general awareness of vector-borne diseases, the implementation of vector protection measures is not uniform across the village. There is a need for targeted interventions to improve the effectiveness of vector protection measures and increase awareness among the community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vector Borne Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vector Borne Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JVBD.JVBD_27_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vector Borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JVBD.JVBD_27_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景目标:蚊媒疾病是世界各地日益严重的问题,对人类造成很高的死亡率和发病率。本研究旨在评估农村 BPL(贫困线以下)家庭采取的病媒防护措施,并评估农村 BPL 家庭对病媒传播疾病以及全面卫生运动(TSC)的认识:在获得 Nirmal Gram Puraskar 奖的农村地区,对 96 个贫困线以下家庭进行了为期三个月的横断面研究。这些家庭(每 5 户)通过系统随机抽样的方式选出,直至达到样本量。我们从研究参与者那里收集了基本的社会人口详情、病媒保护措施状况、固体废物管理、病媒传染的疾病和全面卫生运动详情。我们向户主发放了经过预先测试的半结构化问卷,其中包括通过逐户访问了解家庭卫生状况。收集到的数据使用 SPSS 20 版进行分析。数据以频率、百分比、平均值和标准差表示:在被调查的 96 个家庭(454 名成人和儿童)中,84 个(87.5%)为男性,12 个(12.5%)为女性。291个家庭(64.1%)使用一种或另一种防蚊措施,52个家庭(54.2%)使用蚊帐,23个家庭(23.9%)使用蚊香。12个家庭(12.5%)没有使用任何防蚊措施。在我们的研究中,66 个家庭(68.8%)有独立的家庭厕所(IHHL),50 个家庭(52.1%)有露天下水道。尽管有 314 名参与者拥有独立的家庭厕所,但仍有 20 人(6.36%)采用露天排便,而没有独立家庭厕所的 127 人(90.7%)则采用露天排便。当被问及对病媒传播疾病的认识时,56 个家庭(58.3%)了解基孔肯雅病,47 个家庭(48.9%)了解登革热,46 个家庭(47.9%)了解疟疾,14 个家庭(14.6%)了解日本脑炎,只有 5 个家庭(5.2%)了解日本脑炎。在这项研究中,37 个家庭(38.5%)了解全面环境卫生运动,40 个家庭(41.6%)了解政府对环境卫生的支持:虽然人们对病媒传播的疾病有普遍的认识,但全村病媒保护措施的实施情况并不一致。有必要采取有针对性的干预措施,以提高病媒保护措施的有效性,并增强社区居民的意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Status of vector protection measures and awareness regarding vector borne diseases in families residing in a "Nirmal Gram Puraskar" village in India.

Background objectives: Mosquito-bome diseases are increasing problems in various parts of the world, causing high mortality and morbidity for humans. This study was done to assess the vector protection measures taken by rural below poverty line (BPL) families, and to assess the awareness about vector-borne diseases along with Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) in rural BPL families.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a rural area which won "Nirmal Gram Puraskar" Award i.e., "clean village" among 96 below BPL families for a period of three months. These families (every 5 th ) were selected by systematic random sampling until we reached a sample size. Basic socio-demographic details, status of vector protection measures, solid waste management, vector-borne diseases and total sanitation campaign details were collected from the study participants. Pretested, semi-structured questionnaire was applied to the head of the families which included sanitation status at home by house-to-house visit. Data collected was analysed using SPSS version 20 and presented as frequency, percentages, mean and standard deviation.

Results: Among 96 families studied (454 adults and children), 84 (87.5%) were males and 12 (12.5%) were females. Among these, 291 (64.1%) were using one or the other mosquito protection measures, 52 (54.2%) were using bednets and 23 (23.9%) used coils. 12 families (12.5%) were not using any mosquito protection measures. In our study, 66 (68.8%) families had individual household latrine (IHHL) and 50 (52.1%) had open drainage. Even though 314 participants had an access to individual household latrine, 20 (6.36%) had practice of open air defecation compared to 127 (90.7%) who practiced open air defecation without an access to individual household latrine. When asked about the awareness regarding vector-borne diseases, 56 (58.3%) were aware about chikungunya, 47 (48.9%) about dengue, 46 (47.9%) about malaria, 14 (14.6%) and only 5 (5.2%) families were aware about Japanese encephalitis. In this study, 37 (38.5%) were aware about the total sanitation campaign and 40 (41.6%) about the government support for sanitation.

Interpretation conclusion: While there is a general awareness of vector-borne diseases, the implementation of vector protection measures is not uniform across the village. There is a need for targeted interventions to improve the effectiveness of vector protection measures and increase awareness among the community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vector Borne Diseases
Journal of Vector Borne Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-PARASITOLOGY
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: National Institute of Malaria Research on behalf of Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) publishes the Journal of Vector Borne Diseases. This Journal was earlier published as the Indian Journal of Malariology, a peer reviewed and open access biomedical journal in the field of vector borne diseases. The Journal publishes review articles, original research articles, short research communications, case reports of prime importance, letters to the editor in the field of vector borne diseases and their control.
期刊最新文献
Accelerating the fight towards malaria elimination: bridging gaps to achieve health equity in India. Assessment of larvicidal, growth-suppressing, and developmentaltering bioefficacy of Ageratum houstonianum against Aedes aegypti (L.). Bridging the gaps: prioritizing research strategies for enhanced malaria control and elimination. Characterization of Anopheles mosquito breeding habitats for malaria vector control in Mazowe and Shamva districts, Zimbabwe. Coverage and evaluation survey of post-mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis in four endemic districts of Uttar Pradesh: are we on the track?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1