28-8和22C3测定的PD-L1结果不一致与接受nivolumab加化疗的胃癌患者的预后有关。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastric Cancer Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1007/s10120-024-01500-x
Hyung-Don Kim, Jinho Shin, In Hye Song, Jaewon Hyung, Hyungeun Lee, Min-Hee Ryu, Young Soo Park
{"title":"28-8和22C3测定的PD-L1结果不一致与接受nivolumab加化疗的胃癌患者的预后有关。","authors":"Hyung-Don Kim, Jinho Shin, In Hye Song, Jaewon Hyung, Hyungeun Lee, Min-Hee Ryu, Young Soo Park","doi":"10.1007/s10120-024-01500-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the concordance/discordance of PD-L1 staining results between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays and its impact on the efficacy outcomes of advanced gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 143 gastric cancer patients treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy whose PD-L1 results with both 28-8 and 22C3 assays were available. The concordance/discordance between these assays and the inter-observer variability were evaluated for PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) positivity. Discordant PD-L1 results were analyzed regarding survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement rates and Cohen's kappa values between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays were 78.3% and 0.56 (for CPS ≥ 1), 81.8% and 0.60 (for CPS ≥ 5), and 88.8% and 0.66 (for CPS ≥ 10), respectively. Inter-observer variability, as represented by the intra-class correlation coefficient, was 0.89 and 0.88 for the 28-8 and 22C3 assays, respectively. With PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 defined as positive, 35 (24.5%) and 82 (57.3%) had concordantly positive and negative results, respectively, between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays, whereas 26 (18.2%) had discordant results. Progression-free survival was shorter for those who exhibited negatively concordant PD-L1 results and discordant PD-L1 positivity between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays relative to those with positively concordant PD-L1 results (P = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PD-L1 assays by 28-8 and 22C3 showed suboptimal concordance, while inter-observer variability was not critical in advanced gastric cancer. Discordant PD-L1 results between 28-8 and 22C3 assays may be associated with unfavorable efficacy outcomes in patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"819-826"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discordant PD-L1 results between 28-8 and 22C3 assays are associated with outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Hyung-Don Kim, Jinho Shin, In Hye Song, Jaewon Hyung, Hyungeun Lee, Min-Hee Ryu, Young Soo Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10120-024-01500-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the concordance/discordance of PD-L1 staining results between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays and its impact on the efficacy outcomes of advanced gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 143 gastric cancer patients treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy whose PD-L1 results with both 28-8 and 22C3 assays were available. The concordance/discordance between these assays and the inter-observer variability were evaluated for PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) positivity. Discordant PD-L1 results were analyzed regarding survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement rates and Cohen's kappa values between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays were 78.3% and 0.56 (for CPS ≥ 1), 81.8% and 0.60 (for CPS ≥ 5), and 88.8% and 0.66 (for CPS ≥ 10), respectively. Inter-observer variability, as represented by the intra-class correlation coefficient, was 0.89 and 0.88 for the 28-8 and 22C3 assays, respectively. With PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 defined as positive, 35 (24.5%) and 82 (57.3%) had concordantly positive and negative results, respectively, between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays, whereas 26 (18.2%) had discordant results. Progression-free survival was shorter for those who exhibited negatively concordant PD-L1 results and discordant PD-L1 positivity between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays relative to those with positively concordant PD-L1 results (P = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PD-L1 assays by 28-8 and 22C3 showed suboptimal concordance, while inter-observer variability was not critical in advanced gastric cancer. Discordant PD-L1 results between 28-8 and 22C3 assays may be associated with unfavorable efficacy outcomes in patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastric Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"819-826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastric Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-024-01500-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastric Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-024-01500-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景我们评估了28-8和22C3检测法之间PD-L1染色结果的一致性/不一致性及其对接受尼伐单抗联合化疗的晚期胃癌患者疗效的影响:这项回顾性研究涉及143例接受一线尼妥珠单抗联合化疗治疗的胃癌患者,他们的PD-L1染色结果均可通过28-8和22C3检测获得。针对 PD-L1 联合阳性评分(CPS)阳性评估了这些检测方法之间的一致性/不一致性以及观察者之间的差异性。对不一致的PD-L1结果进行了生存结果分析:结果:28-8和22C3检测法的一致率和科恩卡帕值分别为78.3%和0.56(CPS≥1)、81.8%和0.60(CPS≥5)以及88.8%和0.66(CPS≥10)。28-8和22C3测定的观察者间变异性(以类内相关系数表示)分别为0.89和0.88。在 PD-L1 CPS≥ 5 定义为阳性的情况下,28-8 和 22C3 检测法的阳性和阴性结果一致的分别有 35 例(24.5%)和 82 例(57.3%),而结果不一致的有 26 例(18.2%)。与PD-L1检测结果呈阳性的患者相比,PD-L1检测结果呈阴性和28-8与22C3检测结果呈阳性的患者的无进展生存期更短(P = 0.013):结论:在晚期胃癌中,28-8和22C3检测方法的PD-L1检测结果一致性不佳,而观察者之间的差异并不严重。28-8和22C3检测方法的PD-L1结果不一致可能与接受尼伐单抗加化疗的患者疗效不佳有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discordant PD-L1 results between 28-8 and 22C3 assays are associated with outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy.

Background: We evaluated the concordance/discordance of PD-L1 staining results between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays and its impact on the efficacy outcomes of advanced gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy.

Methods: This retrospective study involved 143 gastric cancer patients treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy whose PD-L1 results with both 28-8 and 22C3 assays were available. The concordance/discordance between these assays and the inter-observer variability were evaluated for PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) positivity. Discordant PD-L1 results were analyzed regarding survival outcomes.

Results: The agreement rates and Cohen's kappa values between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays were 78.3% and 0.56 (for CPS ≥ 1), 81.8% and 0.60 (for CPS ≥ 5), and 88.8% and 0.66 (for CPS ≥ 10), respectively. Inter-observer variability, as represented by the intra-class correlation coefficient, was 0.89 and 0.88 for the 28-8 and 22C3 assays, respectively. With PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 defined as positive, 35 (24.5%) and 82 (57.3%) had concordantly positive and negative results, respectively, between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays, whereas 26 (18.2%) had discordant results. Progression-free survival was shorter for those who exhibited negatively concordant PD-L1 results and discordant PD-L1 positivity between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays relative to those with positively concordant PD-L1 results (P = 0.013).

Conclusion: PD-L1 assays by 28-8 and 22C3 showed suboptimal concordance, while inter-observer variability was not critical in advanced gastric cancer. Discordant PD-L1 results between 28-8 and 22C3 assays may be associated with unfavorable efficacy outcomes in patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastric Cancer
Gastric Cancer 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastric Cancer is an esteemed global forum that focuses on various aspects of gastric cancer research, treatment, and biology worldwide. The journal promotes a diverse range of content, including original articles, case reports, short communications, and technical notes. It also welcomes Letters to the Editor discussing published articles or sharing viewpoints on gastric cancer topics. Review articles are predominantly sought after by the Editor, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the field. With a dedicated and knowledgeable editorial team, the journal is committed to providing exceptional support and ensuring high levels of author satisfaction. In fact, over 90% of published authors have expressed their intent to publish again in our esteemed journal.
期刊最新文献
Survival outcomes of patients with gastric cancer treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy based on claudin 18.2 expression. Decorin as a key marker of desmoplastic cancer-associated fibroblasts mediating first-line immune checkpoint blockade resistance in metastatic gastric cancer. Predictors of tolerability for postoperative adjuvant S1 plus docetaxel chemotherapy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study. Short-term outcomes of a phase II trial of perioperative capecitabine plus oxaliplatin therapy for advanced gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastases (OGSG1701). Advantages of adjuvant chemotherapy using S-1 following minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer versus open surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1