{"title":"急性心力衰竭患者静脉注射利尿剂治疗中的定量尿钠指导:随机对照试验","authors":"Maryam Khorramshahi Bayat, Wandy Chan, Karen Hay, Scott McKenzie, Polash Adhikari, Gavin Fincher, Faye Jordan, Isuru Ranasinghe","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spot urinary sodium concentration (UNa) is advocated in guidelines to assess diuretic response and titrate dosage in acute heart failure (AHF). However, no randomized controlled trial data exist to support this approach. We performed a prospective pilot trial to investigate the feasibility of this approach.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Sixty patients with AHF (n = 30 in each arm) were randomly assigned to titration of loop diuretics for the first 48 h of admission according to UNa levels (intervention arm) or based on clinical signs and symptoms of congestion (standard care arm). Diuretic insufficiency was defined as UNa <50 mmol/L. Endpoints relating to diuretic efficacy, safety, and AHF outcomes were evaluated. UNa-guided therapy patients experienced less acute kidney injury (20% vs. 50%, P = 0.01) and a tendency towards less hypokalaemia (serum K+ <3.5 mmol, 7% vs. 27%, P = 0.04), with greater weight loss (3.3 kg vs. 2.1 kg, P = 0.01). They reported a greater reduction in the clinical congestion score (-4.7 vs. -2.6, P < 0.01) and were more likely to report marked symptom improvement (40% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.04) at 48 h. There was no difference in the length of hospital stay (median length of stay: 8 days in both groups, P = 0.98), 30-day mortality, or readmission rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UNa-guided titration of diuretic therapy in AHF is feasible and safer than titration based on clinical signs and symptoms of congestion, with more effective decongestion at 48 h. Further large-scale trials are needed to determine if the superiority of this approach translates into improved patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ACTRN12621000950864.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"97-104"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spot urinary sodium-guided titration of intravenous diuretic therapy in acute heart failure: a pilot randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Khorramshahi Bayat, Wandy Chan, Karen Hay, Scott McKenzie, Polash Adhikari, Gavin Fincher, Faye Jordan, Isuru Ranasinghe\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spot urinary sodium concentration (UNa) is advocated in guidelines to assess diuretic response and titrate dosage in acute heart failure (AHF). However, no randomized controlled trial data exist to support this approach. We performed a prospective pilot trial to investigate the feasibility of this approach.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Sixty patients with AHF (n = 30 in each arm) were randomly assigned to titration of loop diuretics for the first 48 h of admission according to UNa levels (intervention arm) or based on clinical signs and symptoms of congestion (standard care arm). Diuretic insufficiency was defined as UNa <50 mmol/L. Endpoints relating to diuretic efficacy, safety, and AHF outcomes were evaluated. UNa-guided therapy patients experienced less acute kidney injury (20% vs. 50%, P = 0.01) and a tendency towards less hypokalaemia (serum K+ <3.5 mmol, 7% vs. 27%, P = 0.04), with greater weight loss (3.3 kg vs. 2.1 kg, P = 0.01). They reported a greater reduction in the clinical congestion score (-4.7 vs. -2.6, P < 0.01) and were more likely to report marked symptom improvement (40% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.04) at 48 h. There was no difference in the length of hospital stay (median length of stay: 8 days in both groups, P = 0.98), 30-day mortality, or readmission rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UNa-guided titration of diuretic therapy in AHF is feasible and safer than titration based on clinical signs and symptoms of congestion, with more effective decongestion at 48 h. Further large-scale trials are needed to determine if the superiority of this approach translates into improved patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ACTRN12621000950864.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"97-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:指南中提倡使用定点尿钠浓度(UNa)来评估急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的利尿剂反应和剂量滴定。然而,没有随机对照试验数据支持这种方法。我们进行了一项前瞻性试点试验,以研究这种方法的可行性。方法:60 名急性心力衰竭患者(每组 30 人)被随机分配到根据 UNa 水平(干预组)或根据充血的临床症状和体征(标准护理组)在入院后 48 小时内滴定襻利尿剂。利尿剂不足的定义是 UNa 结果:在 UNa 指导下接受治疗的患者急性肾损伤较少(20% 对 50%,P = 0.01),低钾血症(血清 K+)也有减少的趋势:与根据充血的临床症状和体征进行滴定相比,在联合国指导下对急性肾功能衰竭患者进行滴定利尿剂治疗是可行且更安全的,而且在 48 小时时能更有效地缓解充血。需要进一步开展大规模试验,以确定这种方法的优越性是否能改善患者的预后。
Spot urinary sodium-guided titration of intravenous diuretic therapy in acute heart failure: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Background: Spot urinary sodium concentration (UNa) is advocated in guidelines to assess diuretic response and titrate dosage in acute heart failure (AHF). However, no randomized controlled trial data exist to support this approach. We performed a prospective pilot trial to investigate the feasibility of this approach.
Methods and results: Sixty patients with AHF (n = 30 in each arm) were randomly assigned to titration of loop diuretics for the first 48 h of admission according to UNa levels (intervention arm) or based on clinical signs and symptoms of congestion (standard care arm). Diuretic insufficiency was defined as UNa <50 mmol/L. Endpoints relating to diuretic efficacy, safety, and AHF outcomes were evaluated. UNa-guided therapy patients experienced less acute kidney injury (20% vs. 50%, P = 0.01) and a tendency towards less hypokalaemia (serum K+ <3.5 mmol, 7% vs. 27%, P = 0.04), with greater weight loss (3.3 kg vs. 2.1 kg, P = 0.01). They reported a greater reduction in the clinical congestion score (-4.7 vs. -2.6, P < 0.01) and were more likely to report marked symptom improvement (40% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.04) at 48 h. There was no difference in the length of hospital stay (median length of stay: 8 days in both groups, P = 0.98), 30-day mortality, or readmission rate.
Conclusion: UNa-guided titration of diuretic therapy in AHF is feasible and safer than titration based on clinical signs and symptoms of congestion, with more effective decongestion at 48 h. Further large-scale trials are needed to determine if the superiority of this approach translates into improved patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.