评估在全腹子宫切除术伤口中持续浸润罗哌卡因时添加硫酸镁辅助剂与单独使用罗哌卡因相比的镇痛效果:随机对照试验。

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.4103/joacp.joacp_239_22
Devalina Goswami, Mahesh K Arora, Karthik V Iyer, Nageswara Rao Tangirala, Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Sunesh Kumar, Mani Kalaivani
{"title":"评估在全腹子宫切除术伤口中持续浸润罗哌卡因时添加硫酸镁辅助剂与单独使用罗哌卡因相比的镇痛效果:随机对照试验。","authors":"Devalina Goswami, Mahesh K Arora, Karthik V Iyer, Nageswara Rao Tangirala, Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Sunesh Kumar, Mani Kalaivani","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_239_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Magnesium sulfate (MgSO<sub>4</sub>) has been demonstrated to have analgesic property in various clinical settings. This study explores if addition of MgSO<sub>4</sub> to ropivacaine increases its analgesic efficacy when infiltrated continuously in the postsurgical wound following total abdominal hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care referral hospital in New Delhi, India. Fifty-two patients were randomized into two groups to receive the intervention of which 48 were able to complete the study. The first group (<i>n</i> = 26) received 0.25% ropivacaine infiltration and the second group (<i>n</i> = 26) received 0.25% ropivacaine with 5% MgSO<sub>4</sub> at the incision site for 48 h postoperatively. Primary objective was to compare the total postoperative opioid (morphine) consumption by the study participants in both the groups and the secondary objectives were pain scores at rest and at movement, patient satisfaction score, and wound quality of life on the 7<sup>th</sup> postoperative day among the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the groups were comparable in their demographic characteristics. The median morphine consumed at 48 h postoperatively was 16.5 [0-77] mg in the ropivacaine group and 13[1-45] mg in the ropivacaine with MgSO<sub>4</sub> group and the difference was statistically insignificant (<i>P</i> = 0.788). There was no statistical difference between the groups with respect to the pain scores, patient satisfaction, or wound quality of life at 7 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of MgSO<sub>4</sub> to ropivacaine does not confer any additional postoperative analgesic benefits over ropivacaine alone in continuous wound infiltration following total abdominal hysterectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To assess the analgesic efficacy of adjuvant magnesium sulfate added with ropivacaine over ropivacaine alone as a continuous infiltration in total abdominal hysterectomy wound: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Devalina Goswami, Mahesh K Arora, Karthik V Iyer, Nageswara Rao Tangirala, Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Sunesh Kumar, Mani Kalaivani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joacp.joacp_239_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Magnesium sulfate (MgSO<sub>4</sub>) has been demonstrated to have analgesic property in various clinical settings. This study explores if addition of MgSO<sub>4</sub> to ropivacaine increases its analgesic efficacy when infiltrated continuously in the postsurgical wound following total abdominal hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care referral hospital in New Delhi, India. Fifty-two patients were randomized into two groups to receive the intervention of which 48 were able to complete the study. The first group (<i>n</i> = 26) received 0.25% ropivacaine infiltration and the second group (<i>n</i> = 26) received 0.25% ropivacaine with 5% MgSO<sub>4</sub> at the incision site for 48 h postoperatively. Primary objective was to compare the total postoperative opioid (morphine) consumption by the study participants in both the groups and the secondary objectives were pain scores at rest and at movement, patient satisfaction score, and wound quality of life on the 7<sup>th</sup> postoperative day among the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the groups were comparable in their demographic characteristics. The median morphine consumed at 48 h postoperatively was 16.5 [0-77] mg in the ropivacaine group and 13[1-45] mg in the ropivacaine with MgSO<sub>4</sub> group and the difference was statistically insignificant (<i>P</i> = 0.788). There was no statistical difference between the groups with respect to the pain scores, patient satisfaction, or wound quality of life at 7 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of MgSO<sub>4</sub> to ropivacaine does not confer any additional postoperative analgesic benefits over ropivacaine alone in continuous wound infiltration following total abdominal hysterectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042103/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_239_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_239_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:硫酸镁(MgSO4)已被证实在各种临床环境中具有镇痛作用。本研究探讨了在罗哌卡因中添加硫酸镁是否会增加其在全腹子宫切除术后伤口中持续浸润的镇痛效果:这项随机对照试验在印度新德里的一家三级转诊医院进行。52 名患者被随机分为两组接受干预,其中 48 人完成了研究。第一组(26 人)接受 0.25% 罗哌卡因浸润,第二组(26 人)术后 48 小时在切口部位接受 0.25% 罗哌卡因加 5% MgSO4。主要目的是比较两组参与者术后阿片类药物(吗啡)的总消耗量,次要目的是比较两组患者术后第7天的静息和运动疼痛评分、患者满意度评分和伤口生活质量:结果:两组患者的人口统计学特征相当。罗哌卡因组术后 48 小时的吗啡消耗量中位数为 16.5 [0-77] 毫克,罗哌卡因加 MgSO4 组为 13 [1-45] 毫克,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.788)。在7天的疼痛评分、患者满意度或伤口生活质量方面,各组之间没有统计学差异:结论:在全腹子宫切除术后的连续伤口浸润中,在罗哌卡因中添加硫酸镁不会比单独使用罗哌卡因带来额外的术后镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
To assess the analgesic efficacy of adjuvant magnesium sulfate added with ropivacaine over ropivacaine alone as a continuous infiltration in total abdominal hysterectomy wound: A randomized controlled trial.

Background and aims: Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) has been demonstrated to have analgesic property in various clinical settings. This study explores if addition of MgSO4 to ropivacaine increases its analgesic efficacy when infiltrated continuously in the postsurgical wound following total abdominal hysterectomy.

Material and methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care referral hospital in New Delhi, India. Fifty-two patients were randomized into two groups to receive the intervention of which 48 were able to complete the study. The first group (n = 26) received 0.25% ropivacaine infiltration and the second group (n = 26) received 0.25% ropivacaine with 5% MgSO4 at the incision site for 48 h postoperatively. Primary objective was to compare the total postoperative opioid (morphine) consumption by the study participants in both the groups and the secondary objectives were pain scores at rest and at movement, patient satisfaction score, and wound quality of life on the 7th postoperative day among the two groups.

Results: Both the groups were comparable in their demographic characteristics. The median morphine consumed at 48 h postoperatively was 16.5 [0-77] mg in the ropivacaine group and 13[1-45] mg in the ropivacaine with MgSO4 group and the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.788). There was no statistical difference between the groups with respect to the pain scores, patient satisfaction, or wound quality of life at 7 days.

Conclusion: The addition of MgSO4 to ropivacaine does not confer any additional postoperative analgesic benefits over ropivacaine alone in continuous wound infiltration following total abdominal hysterectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
期刊最新文献
"Burnout syndrome" in anesthesiologists and remedial measures- A narrative review. Stellate ganglion block beyond chronic pain: A literature review on its application in painful and non-painful conditions. Ropivacaine pharmacokinetics in the arterial and venous pools after ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral nerve block. Role of an epidural in laparoscopic surgeries. Managing a leaky epidural catheter: Thinking out of the box.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1