[龈沟液中的短链脂肪酸与Ⅲ期或Ⅳ期牙周炎的关系]。

Q3 Medicine 北京大学学报(医学版) Pub Date : 2024-04-18
Yuru Hu, Juan Liu, Wenjing Li, Yibing Zhao, Qiqiang Li, Ruifang Lu, Huanxin Meng
{"title":"[龈沟液中的短链脂肪酸与Ⅲ期或Ⅳ期牙周炎的关系]。","authors":"Yuru Hu, Juan Liu, Wenjing Li, Yibing Zhao, Qiqiang Li, Ruifang Lu, Huanxin Meng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the concentration of formic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of patients with stages Ⅲ and Ⅳ periodontitis, and their relationship with periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study enrolled 37 systemically healthy patients with periodontitis and 19 healthy controls who visited Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from February 2008 to May 2011. Their GCFs were collected from the mesial-buccal site of one molar or incisor in each quadrant. Periodontal clinical parameters, including plaque index(PLI), probing depth(PD), bleeding index(BI), and attachment loss(AL). Concentrations of formic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid in the supernatant of the GCFs were analyzed by high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE). The prediction ability of formic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid with the risk of periodontitis and the differences between grade B and grade C periodontitis were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 32 patients with stage Ⅲ and 5 patients with stage Ⅳ were enrolled, including 9 patients with grade B and 28 patients with grade C. Clinical periodontal variables in the patients with periodontitis were significantly higher than those in the control group (<i>P</i><0.001). Formic acid was significantly lower in periodontitis than that in the control group [5.37 (3.39, 8.49) mmol/L <i>vs.</i> 12.29 (8.35, 16.57) mmol/L, <i>P</i><0.001]. Propionic acid and butyric acid in periodontitis were significantly higher than those in the control group: Propionic acid, 10.23 (4.28, 14.90) mmol/L <i>vs.</i> 2.71 (0.00, 4.25) mmol/L, <i>P</i> < 0.001; butyric acid, 2.63 (0.47, 3.81) mmol/L <i>vs.</i> 0.00 (0.00, 0.24) mmol/L, <i>P</i><0.001. There was no significant difference in formic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid concentrations between grade B and grade C periodontitis (<i>P</i>>0.05). Propionic acid and butyric acid in the deep pocket were significantly higher than in the shallow pocket, while the concentration of formic acid decreased with the increase of PD. Propionic acid (<i>OR</i>=1.51, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.29-1.75) and butyric acid (<i>OR</i>=3.72, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.93-7.17) were risk factors for periodontitis, while formic acid (<i>OR</i>=0.87, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.81-0.93) might be a protective factor for periodontitis. Propionic acid (AUC=0.852, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.805-0.900), butyric acid (AUC=0.889, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.841-0.937), f (formic acid, AUC=0.844, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.793-0.895) demonstrated a good predictive capacity for the risk of periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concentration of formic acid decrease in the GCF of periodontitis patients, which is a protective factor for periodontitis, its reciprocal have good predictive capacity. However, propionic acid and butyric acid increase, which are risk factors for periodontitis and have good predictive capacity. The concentration of formic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid vary with probing depth, but there is no significant difference between grade B and grade C periodontitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8790,"journal":{"name":"北京大学学报(医学版)","volume":"56 2","pages":"332-337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11004952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Relationship between short-chain fatty acids in the gingival crevicular fluid and periodontitis of stage Ⅲ or Ⅳ].\",\"authors\":\"Yuru Hu, Juan Liu, Wenjing Li, Yibing Zhao, Qiqiang Li, Ruifang Lu, Huanxin Meng\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the concentration of formic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of patients with stages Ⅲ and Ⅳ periodontitis, and their relationship with periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study enrolled 37 systemically healthy patients with periodontitis and 19 healthy controls who visited Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from February 2008 to May 2011. Their GCFs were collected from the mesial-buccal site of one molar or incisor in each quadrant. Periodontal clinical parameters, including plaque index(PLI), probing depth(PD), bleeding index(BI), and attachment loss(AL). Concentrations of formic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid in the supernatant of the GCFs were analyzed by high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE). The prediction ability of formic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid with the risk of periodontitis and the differences between grade B and grade C periodontitis were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 32 patients with stage Ⅲ and 5 patients with stage Ⅳ were enrolled, including 9 patients with grade B and 28 patients with grade C. Clinical periodontal variables in the patients with periodontitis were significantly higher than those in the control group (<i>P</i><0.001). Formic acid was significantly lower in periodontitis than that in the control group [5.37 (3.39, 8.49) mmol/L <i>vs.</i> 12.29 (8.35, 16.57) mmol/L, <i>P</i><0.001]. Propionic acid and butyric acid in periodontitis were significantly higher than those in the control group: Propionic acid, 10.23 (4.28, 14.90) mmol/L <i>vs.</i> 2.71 (0.00, 4.25) mmol/L, <i>P</i> < 0.001; butyric acid, 2.63 (0.47, 3.81) mmol/L <i>vs.</i> 0.00 (0.00, 0.24) mmol/L, <i>P</i><0.001. There was no significant difference in formic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid concentrations between grade B and grade C periodontitis (<i>P</i>>0.05). Propionic acid and butyric acid in the deep pocket were significantly higher than in the shallow pocket, while the concentration of formic acid decreased with the increase of PD. Propionic acid (<i>OR</i>=1.51, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.29-1.75) and butyric acid (<i>OR</i>=3.72, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.93-7.17) were risk factors for periodontitis, while formic acid (<i>OR</i>=0.87, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.81-0.93) might be a protective factor for periodontitis. Propionic acid (AUC=0.852, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.805-0.900), butyric acid (AUC=0.889, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.841-0.937), f (formic acid, AUC=0.844, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.793-0.895) demonstrated a good predictive capacity for the risk of periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concentration of formic acid decrease in the GCF of periodontitis patients, which is a protective factor for periodontitis, its reciprocal have good predictive capacity. However, propionic acid and butyric acid increase, which are risk factors for periodontitis and have good predictive capacity. The concentration of formic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid vary with probing depth, but there is no significant difference between grade B and grade C periodontitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"北京大学学报(医学版)\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"332-337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11004952/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"北京大学学报(医学版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"北京大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期牙周炎患者牙龈细缝液(GCF)中甲酸、丙酸和丁酸的浓度及其与牙周炎的关系:研究对象为2008年2月至2011年5月在北京大学口腔医学院附属北京大学口腔医院牙周科就诊的37名全身健康的牙周炎患者和19名健康对照者。他们的 GCF 都是从每个象限的一颗磨牙或切牙的颊面部位采集的。牙周临床参数包括牙菌斑指数(PLI)、探诊深度(PD)、出血指数(BI)和附着丧失指数(AL)。采用高性能毛细管电泳(HPCE)分析了GCF上清液中甲酸、丙酸和丁酸的浓度。分析了甲酸、丙酸和丁酸对牙周炎风险的预测能力以及B级和C级牙周炎之间的差异:本研究共纳入 32 例Ⅲ期患者和 5 例Ⅳ期患者,其中 B 级患者 9 例,C 级患者 28 例。牙周炎患者的临床牙周变量明显高于对照组(Pvs.12.29(8.35,16.57)mmol/L,Pvs.2.71(0.00,4.25)mmol/L,P<0.001;丁酸,2.63(0.47,3.81)mmol/L vs. 0.00(0.00,0.24)mmol/L,PP>0.05)。深袋中的丙酸和丁酸明显高于浅袋,而甲酸的浓度随着 PD 的增加而降低。丙酸(OR=1.51,95%CI:1.29-1.75)和丁酸(OR=3.72,95%CI:1.93-7.17)是牙周炎的危险因素,而甲酸(OR=0.87,95%CI:0.81-0.93)可能是牙周炎的保护因素。丙酸(AUC=0.852,95%CI:0.805-0.900)、丁酸(AUC=0.889,95%CI:0.841-0.937)、甲酸(AUC=0.844,95%CI:0.793-0.895)对牙周炎的风险具有良好的预测能力:结论:牙周炎患者 GCF 中甲酸浓度的下降是牙周炎的保护因素,其倒数具有良好的预测能力。然而,丙酸和丁酸浓度升高,这是牙周炎的危险因素,具有良好的预测能力。甲酸、丙酸和丁酸的浓度随探诊深度的变化而变化,但在 B 级和 C 级牙周炎之间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Relationship between short-chain fatty acids in the gingival crevicular fluid and periodontitis of stage Ⅲ or Ⅳ].

Objective: To analyze the concentration of formic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of patients with stages Ⅲ and Ⅳ periodontitis, and their relationship with periodontitis.

Methods: The study enrolled 37 systemically healthy patients with periodontitis and 19 healthy controls who visited Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from February 2008 to May 2011. Their GCFs were collected from the mesial-buccal site of one molar or incisor in each quadrant. Periodontal clinical parameters, including plaque index(PLI), probing depth(PD), bleeding index(BI), and attachment loss(AL). Concentrations of formic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid in the supernatant of the GCFs were analyzed by high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE). The prediction ability of formic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid with the risk of periodontitis and the differences between grade B and grade C periodontitis were analyzed.

Results: In this study, 32 patients with stage Ⅲ and 5 patients with stage Ⅳ were enrolled, including 9 patients with grade B and 28 patients with grade C. Clinical periodontal variables in the patients with periodontitis were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.001). Formic acid was significantly lower in periodontitis than that in the control group [5.37 (3.39, 8.49) mmol/L vs. 12.29 (8.35, 16.57) mmol/L, P<0.001]. Propionic acid and butyric acid in periodontitis were significantly higher than those in the control group: Propionic acid, 10.23 (4.28, 14.90) mmol/L vs. 2.71 (0.00, 4.25) mmol/L, P < 0.001; butyric acid, 2.63 (0.47, 3.81) mmol/L vs. 0.00 (0.00, 0.24) mmol/L, P<0.001. There was no significant difference in formic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid concentrations between grade B and grade C periodontitis (P>0.05). Propionic acid and butyric acid in the deep pocket were significantly higher than in the shallow pocket, while the concentration of formic acid decreased with the increase of PD. Propionic acid (OR=1.51, 95%CI: 1.29-1.75) and butyric acid (OR=3.72, 95%CI: 1.93-7.17) were risk factors for periodontitis, while formic acid (OR=0.87, 95%CI: 0.81-0.93) might be a protective factor for periodontitis. Propionic acid (AUC=0.852, 95%CI: 0.805-0.900), butyric acid (AUC=0.889, 95%CI: 0.841-0.937), f (formic acid, AUC=0.844, 95%CI: 0.793-0.895) demonstrated a good predictive capacity for the risk of periodontitis.

Conclusion: The concentration of formic acid decrease in the GCF of periodontitis patients, which is a protective factor for periodontitis, its reciprocal have good predictive capacity. However, propionic acid and butyric acid increase, which are risk factors for periodontitis and have good predictive capacity. The concentration of formic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid vary with probing depth, but there is no significant difference between grade B and grade C periodontitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
北京大学学报(医学版)
北京大学学报(医学版) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9815
期刊介绍: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban / Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), established in 1959, is a national academic journal sponsored by Peking University, and its former name is Journal of Beijing Medical University. The coverage of the Journal includes basic medical sciences, clinical medicine, oral medicine, surgery, public health and epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacy. Over the last few years, the Journal has published articles and reports covering major topics in the different special issues (e.g. research on disease genome, theory of drug withdrawal, mechanism and prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, stomatology, orthopaedic, public health, urology and reproductive medicine). All the topics involve latest advances in medical sciences, hot topics in specific specialties, and prevention and treatment of major diseases. The Journal has been indexed and abstracted by PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCO, Embase, Scopus, Chemical Abstracts (CA), Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPR), JSTChina, and almost all the Chinese sciences and technical index systems, including Chinese Science and Technology Paper Citation Database (CSTPCD), Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), China BioMedical Bibliographic Database (CBM), CMCI, Chinese Biological Abstracts, China National Academic Magazine Data-Base (CNKI), Wanfang Data (ChinaInfo), etc.
期刊最新文献
[Association between wearable-derived physical activity patterns and gut microbiota in older adults]. [Analysis of the prevalence and influencing factors of myopia among primary and secondary school students in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in 2022]. [A population-based survey of myopia on primary school students in an administrative district, 2019 to 2024]. [Association between ambient personal temperature exposure and oxygen saturation during sleep in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. [Association analysis between genetic nurturing effects of CTNNA gene family and ischemic stroke].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1